Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The sale of sports broadcasting rights typically involves two distinct stages: first, rights are allocated by sports leagues to broadcasters; second, broadcasters market their content to consumers. This paper focuses on the downstream stage, analyzing how consumer surplus depends on whether a single broadcaster (monopoly) offers the entire product, e.g., the entire league, or multiple broadcasters (duopoly) hold exclusive packages (i.e., exclusive subset of matches). In the latter case, consumers interested in the entire product must subscribe to both firms’ offers to fully reconstruct it. We show that consumer surplus under monopoly exceeds that under duopoly when consumer valuations for the entire product are sufficiently high relative to the valuations for single components (i.e., exclusive subset of matches) and when marginal costs are low. Conversely, when the added value of the entire product compared to the single components is not sufficiently high or marginal costs are higher, duopoly benefit consumers.

Keywords

Consumer surplus market structure monopoly duopoly sports broadcasting competition policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

W. J.

Yellen

J. L.

(1976). Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(3), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1886045

Bakos

Brynjolfsson

(1999). Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science, 45(12), 1613–1630. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.12.1613

Bayliss

(2023). Why 40% of sports fans are ditching TV and live streaming subscriptions. June 9. Available at https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/sport-sky-sports-bt-subscription-27076153

Bhargava

H. K.

(2013). Mixed bundling of two independently valued goods. Management Science, 59(9), 2170–2185. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1663

Bhargava

H. K.

(2021). Bundling for flexibility and variety: An economic model for multiproducer value aggregation. Management Science, 67(4), 2365–2380. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3662

Budzinski

Gaenssle

Kunz-Kaltenhäuser

(2019). How does online streaming affect antitrust remedies to centralized marketing? The case of European football broadcasting rights. International Journal Of Sport Finance, 14(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.32731/IJSF.143.082019.02

Butler

Massey

(2019). Has competition in the market for subscription sports broadcasting benefited consumers? The case of the English Premier League. Journal of Sports Economics, 20(4), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002518784121

Cave

Crandall

R. W.

(2001). Sports rights and the broadcast industry. The Economic Journal, 111(469), F4–F26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00596

Chittick

(2023). How much premier league fans will pay as “largest tv rights deal ever” announced. December 5. Available at https://sportslens.com/uk/news/how-much-premier-league-fans-will-pay-as-largest-tv-rights-deal-ever-announced/

10.

Cournot

(1927). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. Originally published in French (1838), translated by Nathaniel Bacon Macmillan.

11.

Crawford

G. S.

Yurukoglu

(2012). The welfare effects of bundling in multichannel television markets. American Economic Review, 102(2), 643–685. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.643

12.

Dansby

R. E.

Conrad

(1984). Commodity bundling. American Economic Review, 74(2), 377–381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1816388

13.

Dietl

H. M.

Grossmann

Lang

(2011). Competitive balance and revenue sharing in sports leagues with utility-maximizing teams. Journal of Sports Economics, 12(3), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002511404787

14.

Economides

Salop

(1992). Competition and integration among complements, and network market structure. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950629

15.

Falconieri

Palomino

Sákovics

(2004). Collective versus individual sale of television rights in league sports. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(5), 833–862. https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476042782305

16.

Fang

Norman

(2006). To package or not to package. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(4), 946–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00065.x

17.

Feinberg

Kamien

M. I.

(2001). Highway robbery: Complementary monopoly and the hold-up problem. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(10), 1603–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00069-2

18.

Feuillet

Scelles

Durand

(2018). A winner’s curse in the bidding process for broadcasting rights in football? The cases of the French and UK markets. Sport in Society, 22(7), 1198–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2018.1505869

19.

Flynn

Gilbert

(2001). The analysis of professional sports leagues as joint ventures. Economic Journal, 111(469), F27–F46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00597

20.

Fort

Quirk

(1995). Cross-subsidization, incentives and outcome in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(3), 1265–1299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729122

21.

Ghosh

Balachander

(2007). Competitive bundling and counter-bundling with generalist and specialist firms. Management Science, 53(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0601

22.

Haghpanah

Hartline

(2021). When is pure bundling optimal? The Review of Economic Studies, 88(3), 1127–1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa053

23.

Hanson

Martin

(1990). Optimal package pricing. Management Science, 36(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.155

24.

Henriques

(2023). A combinatorial auction to sell TV broadcasting rights in league sports. Telecommunications Policy, 47(6), 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102539

25.

Hoehn

Lancefield

(2003). Broadcasting and sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/19.4.552

26.

Jeitschko

T. D.

Jung

Kim

(2017). Bundling and joint marketing by rival firms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 26(3), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12199

27.

Késenne

(2000). Revenue sharing and competitive balance in professional team sports. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/152700250000100105

28.

Késenne

(2009). The impact of pooling and sharing of broadcasting rights in professional team sports. International Journal of Sport Finance, 4(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862350900400305

29.

Késenne

(2014). The collection and distribution of media rights in a win-maximization league. In Goddard

Sloane

(Eds.), Handbook on the economics of professional football (pp. 73–79). Elgar.

30.

Kim

S.-H.

Hahn

J.-H.

(2022). On the profitability of interfirm bundling in oligopolies. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 31(3), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12476

31.

Kolay

Tyagi

R. K.

(2022). Optimal bundling of events. Marketing Science, 41(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1314

32.

Kopel

Loffler

Pfeiffer

(2017). Complementary monopolies and multi-product firms. Economics Letters, 157, 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.021

33.

Krishner

(2022). Sports streaming makes losers of us all. August 25. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/08/sports-streaming-makes-losers-us-all/671231/

34.

Lewbel

(1985). Bundling of substitutes or complements. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(85)90016-5

35.

Macedo

Ferreira Dias

Mourão

P. R.

(2022). European men’s club football in the eyes of consumers: The determinants of television broadcast demand. Journal of Sports Economics, 24(5), 579–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025221143982

36.

Manelli

A. M.

Vincent

D. R.

(2006). Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-goods monopolist. Journal of Economic Theory, 127(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2005.08.007

37.

Noll

R. G.

(2007). Broadcasting and team sports. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 54(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2007.00422.x

38.

Peeters

(2011). Broadcasting rights and competitive balance in European soccer. International Journal of Sport Finance, 6(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862351100600102

39.

Raghunathan

Sarkar

(2013). Competitive bundling in information markets: A seller-side analysis. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.1.05

40.

Solberg

H. A.

(2006). The auctioning of TV sports rights. International Journal of Sport Finance, 1(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862350600100103

41.

Sonnenschein

(1968). The dual of duopoly is complementary monopoly: Or two of Cournot's theories are one. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 316–318. https://doi.org/10.1086/259404

42.

Szymanski

(2003). The economic design of sporting contests. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1137–1187. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.41.4.1137

43.

Thanassoulis

(2007). Competitive mixed bundling and consumer surplus. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(2), 437–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00145.x

44.

Venkatesh

Kamakura

(2003). Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. The Journal of Business, 76(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1086/367748

45.

Zhou

(2017). Competitive bundling. Econometrica, 85(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14251

46.

Zhou

(2021). Mixed bundling in oligopoly markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 194, 105257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105257

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.27 MB

Monopoly Versus Duopoly in Sports Broadcasting: Consumer Surplus Implications

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material