In Germany, some sports clubs increasingly encounter financial problems due to decreasing public subsidies. A way to compensate for the decrease is to increase membership fees. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze members’ willingness-topay (WTP) for membership fees and to identify determinants of WTP. For this study, active, adult members (n = 10,013) in 21 sports were surveyed. The results show that members paid an average annual membership fee of €148 and stated an average WTP of €265. The consumer surplus for all sports amounted to €113 on average. The results of the regression analysis reveal that WTP is determined significantly by the current membership fee, personal income, level of education, years of participation, and level of performance. The findings of the study suggest that increasing membership fees might be one option for sports clubs experiencing financial problems. Sportspecific differences have to be considered in this regard.
AtkinsonG., MouratoS., SzymanskiS., & OzdemirogluE. (2008). Are we willing to pay enough to ‘back the bid'? Valuing the intangible impacts of London's bid to host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games. Urban Studies, 45, 419–444.
2.
BalderjahnI. (2003). Erfassung der Preisbereitschaft [Measuring willingness-to-pay]. In H. Diller & A. Herrmann (Eds.), Handbuch Preispolitik [Handbook pricing] (pp. 388–404). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
3.
BeckerG. M., DeGrootM. H., & MarschakJ. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232.
4.
BortzJ. (2005). Statistik für Humanund Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for the human and social sciences] (6th ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
5.
BreuerC., & WickerP. (2009). Sports clubs in Germany. In C. Breuer (Ed.), Sport Development Report 2007/2008. Analysis of the sports clubs’ situation in Germany: abbreviated version (pp. 5–50). Cologne, Germany: Sportverlag Strauß.
6.
BreuerC., & WickerP. (2010). Sportökonomische Analyse der Lebenssituation von Spitzensportlern in Deutschland [Sports economic analysis of the life situation of elite athletes in Germany].Bonn, Germany: Hausdruckerei des Statistischen Bundesamtes.
7.
BreuerC., & WickerP. (2011). Methode [Method]. In C. Breuer (Ed.), Sportentwicklungsbericht 2009/2010. Analyse zur Situation der Sportvereine in Deutschland [Sports Development Report 2009/2010. Analysis of the situation of sports clubs in Germany] (pp. 535–568). Cologne, Germany: Sportverlag Strauß.
8.
CarlssonF., & MartinssonP. (2001). Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 179192.
9.
CarsonR. T., WrightJ., AlberiniA., CarsonN., & FloresN. (1995). A bibliography of contingent valuation studies and papers.La Jolla, CA: Natural Resource Damage Assessment.
10.
CornesR., & SandlerT. (1986). The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CouperM. P., & CouttsE. (2006). Online-Befragung [Online survey]. In A. Diekmann (Ed.), Methoden der Sozialforschung [Methods of social research] (pp. 217–243). Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialforschung.
12.
DickieM., FisherA., & GerkingS. (1987). Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 69–75.
13.
DownwardP., DawsonA., & DejongheT. (2009). Sports economics: Theory, evidence, and policy.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
14.
Federal Statistical Office (2007a). Ausgaben des Bundes und der Länder für den Sport von 1975 bis 2004 [Expenditure of the state and the federal states on sports from 1975 to 2004].Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office.
15.
Federal Statistical Office (Ed.) (2007b). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2007 [Annual book of statistics 2007]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office.
16.
FrickB. (2006). Salary determination and the pay-performance relationship in professional soccer: Evidence from Germany. In RodriguezP., KesenneS., & GarciaJ. (Eds.), Sports economics after fifty years: Essays in honour of Simon Rottenberg (pp. 125–146). Oviedo, Spain: Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
17.
GablerH., & NagelS. (2006). Die DFB-Vereinsstudie 2005 [The DFB club study].Tübingen, Germany: Institut für Sportwissenschaft.
HorchH.-D. (1992). Geld, Macht und Engagement in freiwilligen Vereinigungen. Grundlage einer Wirtschaftssoziologie von Non-Profit-Organisationen [Money, power, and engagement in voluntary associations. Basis of an economic sociology of non-profit organizations]. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
21.
JohnsonB. K., GroothuisP. A., & WhiteheadJ. C. (2001). The value of public goods generated by a Major League sports team: The CVM approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 2, 6–21.
22.
JohnsonB. K., MondelloM. J., & WhiteheadJ. C. (2006). Contingent valuation of sports: temporal embedding and ordering effects. Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 267–288.
23.
JohnsonB. K., MondelloM. J., & WhiteheadJ. C. (2007). What is the value of public goods generated by a National Football League team: A CVM approach. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 123–136.
24.
JohnsonB. K., & WhiteheadJ. C. (2000). Value of public goods from sport stadiums: The CVM approach. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18, 48–58.
25.
JohnsonB. K., WhiteheadJ. C., MasonD. S., & WalkerG. J. (2007). Willingness to pay for amateur sport and recreation programs. Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 553–564.
26.
KealyM. J., DovidioJ. F., & RockelM. E. (1988). Accuracy in valuation is a matter of degree. Land Economics, 64, 158–171.
27.
LindbergK., & AylwardB. (1999). Price responsiveness in the developing country nature tourism context: Review and Costa Rican case study. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 281–299.
28.
LoomisJ., BrownT., LuceroB., & PetersonG. (1996). Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: Results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay. Land Economics, 72, 450–461.
29.
LuciforaC., & SimmonsR. (2003). Superstar effects in sport: Evidence from Italian soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 4, 35–55.
30.
McAfeeR. P., & McMillanJ. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 699–738.
31.
McCarvilleR. E. (1991). An empirical investigation of the influence of cost information on willingness to pay for public aerobic classes. Leisure Sciences, 13, 85–96.
32.
McCarvilleR. E., & CromptonJ. L. (1987). Propositions addressing perceptions of reference price for public recreation services. Leisure Sciences, 9, 281–291.
33.
MitchellR. C., & CarsonR. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
34.
MullerL., & RuffieuxB. (in press). Do price-tags influence consumers’ willingness to pay? On the external validity of using auctions for measuring value. Experimental Economics (2010).
35.
NagelM. (2003). Die soziale Zusammensetzung der Sportvereinsmitglieder [The social characteristics of sports club members]. In J. Baur & S. Braun (Eds.), Integrationsleistungen von Sportvereinen als Freiwilligenorganisationen [Integrational capacities of sports clubs as voluntary associations] (pp. 409–448). Aachen, Germany: Meyer & Meyer.
36.
NagelS. (2008). Goals of sports clubs. European Journal for Sport and Society, 5, 121–141.
37.
NagelS., ConzelmannA., & GablerH. (2004). Sportvereine - Auslaufmodell oder Hoffnungsträger? Die WLSB-Vereinsstudie [Sports clubs - A thing of the past or a carry of hope? The WLSB club study]. Tübingen, Germany: Attempto.
38.
NeillH. R., CummingsR. G., GandertonP. T., HarrisonG. W., & McGuckinT. (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70, 145–154.
39.
NoonanD. S. (2003). Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 159–176.
40.
OhlF. (1991). Pratiques économiques, pratiques sociales: étude de la genèse sociale du coÛt financier des sports [Economic participation, social participation: Analysis of the social development of the financial costs for sports]. Thèse de sociologie pour le doctorat nouveau régime [PhD Thesis]. Strasbourg, France: Université des Sciences Humaines-UFR des Sciences Sociales.
41.
OwenJ. G. (2006). The intangible benefits of sports teams: A contingent valuation study. Public Finance and Management, 6, 321–345.
42.
RollinsR., & TrotterW. (1999-2000). Public attitudes regarding user fees in provincial forest lands. Leisure: Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies, 24, 139–159.
43.
SattlerH., & NitschkeT. (2003). Ein empirischer Vergleich von Instrumenten zur Erhebung von Zahlungsbereitschaften [An empirical comparison of methods for measuring willingness-topay]. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (zfbf), 55, 364–381.
44.
SeipK., & StrandJ. (1992). Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 91–106.
45.
SpannM., SkieraB., & SchäfersB. (2005). Reverse-Pricing Verfahren und deren Möglichkeiten zur Messung von individuellen Suchkosten und Zahlungsbereitschaften [Reverse pricing and ist opportunities for measuring individual search cost and willingness-to-pay]. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (zfbf), 57, 107–128.
46.
SüssmuthB., HeyneM., & MaennigW. (2010). Induced civic pride and integration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72, 202–220.
47.
TaksM., RensonR., & VanreuselB. (1999). Consumer expenses in sport: a marketing tool for sports and sports facility providers?European Journal for Sport Management, 6, 4–18.
48.
TheysohnS. (2006). Willingness to pay for soccer reports on the internet. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 8, 16–33.
49.
Van EimerenV. B., & FreesB. (2005). ARD/ZDF Online-Studie 2005: Nach dem Boom: Größter Zuwachs in internetfernen Gruppen [ARD/ZDF online study 2005: After the boom: Highest increase in groups that were not familiar with the internet]. Media Perspektiven, 35, 362–379.
50.
VoethM., & SchumacherA. (2003). Ticket-Pricing für die WM 2006: Empfehlungen auf Basis von Informationen zur Zahlungsbereitschaft der deutschen Bevölkerung [Ticket pricing for the 2006 Football World Cup: Recommendations based on information about willingness-to-pay of the German population]. Stuttgart, Germany: Universität Hohenheim, Lehrstuhl für Marketing.
51.
WalkerM., & MondelloM. J., (2007). Moving beyond economic impact: A closer look at the contingent valuation method. International Journal of Sport Finance, 2, 149–160.
52.
WaltonH., LongoA., & DawsonP. (2008). A contingent valuation of the 2012 London Olympic games: A regional perspective. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 304–317.
53.
WeberW., SchniederC., KortlükeN., & HorakB. (1995). Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Sports [The economic importance of sports].Schorndorf, Germany: Hofmann.
54.
WickerP., BreuerC., & PawlowskiT. (2010). Are sports club members big spenders? Findings from sport specific analyses in Germany. Sport Management Review, 13, 214–224.
55.
WrickeM., & HerrmannA. (2002). Ansätze zur Erfassung der individuellen Zahlungsbereitschaft [Approaches for measuring individual willingness-to-pay]. Wissenschaftliches Studium, 31, 573–578.
