Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study focuses on the effect of contest heterogeneity on individuals’ effort provision in rank-order tournaments. We add to the literature by analyzing data from a well-suited setting (professional darts tournaments) that differs significantly from those previously examined (mental effort task without direct interaction between contestants), while applying two different temporal types of heterogeneity, pre-contest and within-contest heterogeneity. We do not find consistent evidence for heterogeneity to influence players’ effort.

Keywords

heterogeneity effort tournaments performance determination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bach

Gürtler

Prinz

(2009). Incentive effects in tournaments with heterogeneous competitors: An analysis of the Olympic Rowing Regatta in Sydney 2000. Management Revue, 20(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1688/1861-9908_mrev_2009_03_Bach

Baker

G. P.

Jensen

M. C.

Murphy

K. J.

(1988). Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. Theory. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04593.x

Balafoutas

Chowdhury

S. M.

Plessner

(2019). Applications of sports data to study decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part B), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.009

Bar-Eli

Krumer

Morgulev

(2020). Ask not what economics can do for sports-ask what sports can do for economics. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 89, 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101597

Baumeister

R. F.

Showers

C. J.

(1986). A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420160405

Beilock

S. L.

Carr

T. H.

(2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 701–725. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701

Berger

Nieken

(2016). Heterogeneous contestants and the intensity of tournaments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(7), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002514538639

Berger

Pope

(2011). Can losing lead to winning? Management Science, 57(5), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1328

Brown

(2011). Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. Journal of Political Economy, 119(5), 982–1013. https://doi.org/10.1086/663306

10.

Chowdhury

S. M.

Gürtler

(2015). Sabotage in contests: A survey. Public Choice, 164(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0264-9

11.

Connelly

B. L.

Tihanyi

Crook

T. R.

Gangloff

K. A.

(2014). Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313498902

12.

Corgnet

Hernán-González

Rassenti

(2015). Peer pressure and moral hazard in teams: Experimental evidence. Review of Behavioral Economics, 2(4), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000040

13.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

Bognanno

M. L.

(1990a). Do tournaments have incentive effects? Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1086/261736

14.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

Bognanno

M. L.

(1990b). The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA tour. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43(3), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793990043003

15.

Eriksson

(1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/209920

16.

Frick

Gürtler

Prinz

(2008). Anreize in Turnieren mit heterogenen Teilnehmern—Eine empirische Untersuchung mit Daten aus der Fußball-Bundesliga. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 60(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372799

17.

Klein Teeselink

Potter van Loon

R. J.

van den Assem

M. J.

van Dolder

(2020). Incentives, performance and choking in darts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.10.026

18.

Klein Teeselink

van den Assem

M. J.

van Dolder

(2023). Does losing Lead to winning? An empirical analysis for four sports. Management Science, 69(1), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4372

19.

Knoeber

C. R.

Thurman

W. N.

(1994). Testing the theory of tournaments: An empirical analysis of broiler production. Journal of Labor Economics, 12(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1086/298354

20.

Kräkel

(2015). Organisation und Management. Neue ökonomische Grundrisse (6., überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage.). Mohr Siebeck.

21.

Kräkel

Sliwka

(2004). Risk taking in asymmetric tournaments. German Economic Review, 5(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-6485.2004.00096.x

22.

Lallemand

Plasman

Rycx

(2008). Women and competition in elimination tournaments: Evidence from professional tennis data. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002506296552

23.

Lazear

E. P.

Rosen

(1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.1086/261010

24.

Lynch

J. G.

(2005). The effort effects of prizes in the second half of tournaments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.005

25.

McLaughlin

K. J.

(1988). Aspects of tournament models: A survey. Research in Labor Economics, 9(1), 225–256.

26.

Moran

A. P.

(1996). The psychology of concentration in sport performers: A cognitive analysis. Psychology Press.

27.

Moran

(2012). Concentration: Attention and performance. In: Murphy

S. M.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology (pp. 117–130). Oxford library of psychology.

28.

Nalebuff

B. J.

Stiglitz

J. E.

(1983). Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003535

29.

Nieken

Stegh

(2010). Incentive effects in asymmetric tournaments empirical evidence from the German Hockey League. SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No. 305 . Germany: University of Bonn.

30.

O’Keeffe

Viscusi

W. K.

Zeckhauser

R. J.

(1984). Economic contests: Comparative reward schemes. Journal of Labor Economics, 2(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/298022

31.

Ötting

Deutscher

Schneemann

Langrock

Gehrmann

Scholten

(2020). Performance under pressure in skill tasks: An analysis of professional darts. PLoS One, 15(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228870

32.

Rosen

(1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. American Economic Review, 76(4), 701–715. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1806068

33.

Schneemann

Deutscher

(2017). Intermediate information, loss aversion, and effort: Empirical evidence. Economic Inquiry, 55(4), 1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12420

34.

Sonnabend

(2020). On discouraging environments in team contests: Evidence from top-level beach volleyball. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3153

35.

Sunde

(2009). Heterogeneity and performance in tournaments: A test for incentive effects using professional tennis data. Applied Economics, 41(25), 3199–3208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802243789

36.

Tanaka

Ishino

(2012). Testing the incentive effects in tournaments with a superstar. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 26(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.001

37.

Yerkes

R. M.

Dodson

J. D.

(1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Punishment: Issues and Experiments, 18(5), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503

You’ve Got Three Choices: Give in,Give up,or Give it All You’ve Got: Does Contest Heterogeneity Affect Effort in Individual Competitions?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References