This paper provides a methodological contribution by illustrating the use of computer vision and machine learning methods to identify facial characteristics for the study of facial characteristics in economics. We analyze facial appearance premia for head football coaches at big-time college sports programs to illustrate this methodology. Specifically, we estimate facial attractiveness and aggressiveness premia using quantitative measures of these characteristics from a neural network approach applied to observable facial features. Parametric regression results show evidence of a salary discount for attractive employees along with evidence of an aggressiveness premium. Nonparametric gradient results provide similar qualitative implications.
AhnS. C.LeeY. H. (2014). Beauty and productivity: The case of the Ladies Professional Golf Association. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12009
2.
AltwaijryH.BelongieS. Relative ranking of facial attractiveness. In 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (pp. 117–124). IEEE, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2013.6475008
3.
BainbridgeW. A. (2017). The memorability of people: Intrinsic memorability across transformations of a person’s face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000339
4.
BainbridgeW. A.IsolaP.OlivaA. (2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872
5.
BakkenbüllL.-B.KieferS. (2015). Are attractive female tennis players more successful? an empirical analysis. Kyklos, 68(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12090
6.
BerriD. J.SimmonsR.Van GilderJ.O’NeillL. (2011). What does it mean to find the face of the franchise? physical attractiveness and the evaluation of athletic performance. Economics Letters, 111(3), 200–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.018
7.
BrookS. L. (2021). A comparison of NCAA FBS head coaches salary determination from new and modified contracts. Journal of Sports Economics, 22(5), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002520988336
8.
ByrdW. J.MixonP. A.WrightA. (2013). Compensation of college football’s head coaches: A case study in firm size’s effects on pay. International Journal of Sport Finance, 8(3), 224–235.
9.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873
10.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M.MondlochC. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x
11.
ColbertG. J.EckardE. W. (2015). Do colleges get what they pay for? evidence on football coach pay and team performance. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(4), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002513501679
12.
DietlH.ÖzdemirA.RendallA. (2020). The role of facial attractiveness in tennis TV-viewership. Sport Management Review, 23(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.04.004
13.
GrantR. R.LeadleyJ. C.ZygmontZ. X. (2013). Just win baby? determinants of NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision coaching compensation. International Journal of Sport Finance, 8(1), 61–74.
14.
HamermeshD. S.BiddleJ. E., et al. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174–1194.
KagianA.DrorG.LeyvandT.MeilijsonI.Cohen-OrD.RuppinE. (2008). A machine learning predictor of facial attractiveness revealing human-like psychophysical biases. Vision Research, 48(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.007
17.
KhoslaA.BainbridgeW. A.TorralbaA.OlivaA. (2013). Modifying the memorability of face photographs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 3200–3207). IEEE.
18.
LaurentiniA.BottinoA. (2014). Computer analysis of face beauty: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 125 (2014), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2014.04.006
19.
LefevreC. E.LewisG. J.PerrettD. I.PenkeL. (2013). Telling facial metrics: Facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005
20.
MuellerU.MazurA. (1996). Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74(3), 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.823
21.
ScholzJ. K.SicinskiK. (2015). Facial attractiveness and lifetime earnings: Evidence from a cohort study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00435
22.
StinebricknerR.StinebricknerT.SullivanP. (2019). Beauty, job tasks, and wages: A new conclusion about employer taste-based discrimination. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(4), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00792
23.
WenY.ZhangK.LiZ.QiaoY (2016). A discriminative feature learning approach for deep face recognition. In Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., & Welling, M. (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2016 (pp. 499–515), Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_31
YamamuraE.HayashiR.TsutsuiY.OhtakeF. (2022). Racers’ attractive looks, popularity, and performance: how do speedboat racers react to fans’ expectations?The Japanese Economic Review, 73, 597–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-020-00064-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
