There is wide evidence for gender differences in competitive behavior and performance under pressure from experimental economics and single-sex professional sports. We analyze these differences in a sport with direct gender competition. Our unique data consist of over 500,000 observations from around 11,000 German ninepin bowling games of which around 15% are from mixed-gender leagues. Men perform better against women on average, but this is fully explained by differences in ability. Our results are robust to instrumenting for opposite gender using the sex composition of the opponent team. Gender differences in tight situations do not seem to play a role.
AlmåsI.CappelenA. W.SalvanesK. G.SørensenE. Ø.TungoddenB. (2015). Willingness to compete: Family matters. Management Science, 62, 2149–2162.
2.
AmroseA.HornT. (2000). Intrinsic motivation relationships with collegiate athletes gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches behavior. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 22, 63–84.
3.
AntonovicsK.ArcidiaconoP.WalshR. (2009). The effects of gender interactions in the lab and in the field. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 152–162.
4.
BackusP.CubelM.GuidM.Sánchez-PagesS.MañasE. (2016). Gender, competition and performance: Evidence from real tournaments (IEB Working Paper 2016/27). Barcelona: Barcelona Institute of Economics (IEB).
5.
BlauF. D.DeVaroJ. (2007). New evidence on gender differences in promotion rates: An empirical analysis of a sample of new hires. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 46, 511–550.
6.
BöheimR.FreudenthalerC.LacknerM. (2016). Gender differences in risk-taking: Evidence from professional basketball (IZA DP No. 10011). Bonn: IZA Discussion Papers.
7.
BoothA.NolenP. (2012). Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 542–555.
8.
BoothA.YamamuraE. (2018). Performance in mixed-sex and single-sex competitions: What we can learn from speedboat races in Japan. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100, 581–593.
9.
BuserT.PeterN.WolterS. C. (2017). Gender, willingness to compete and career choices along the whole ability distribution (IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10976). Bonn: IZA Discussion Papers.
10.
CardD.CardosoA. R.KlineP. (2016). Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 633–686.
11.
Cohen-ZadaD.KrumerA.RosenboimM.ShapirO. M. (2017). Choking under pressure and gender: Evidence from professional tennis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 176–190.
12.
CrosonR.GneezyU. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–474.
13.
CziborE.ClaussenJ.Van PraagM. (2019). Women in a men’s world: Risk taking in an online card game community. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 158, 62–89.
14.
de SousaJ.HollardG. (2015). Gender differences: Evidence from field tournaments (Technical report). Paris, France: CEPREMAP.
D’LimaG. M.WinslerA.KitsantasA. (2014). Ethnic and gender differences in first-year college students’ goal orientation, self-efficacy, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 341–356.
17.
DohmenT.FalkA. (2011). Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. American Economic Review, 101, 556–590.
18.
DreberA.von EssenE.RanehillE. (2011). Outrunning the gender gap—Boys and girls compete equally. Experimental Economics, 14, 567–582.
19.
ExleyC. L.NiederleM.VesterlundL. (2019). Knowing when to ask: The cost of leaning in. Journal of Political Economy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1086/704616
20.
GerdesC.GränsmarkP. (2010). Strategic behavior across gender: a comparison of female and male expert chess players. Labour Economics, 17, 766–775.
21.
GneezyU.NiederleM.RustichiniA. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1049–1074.
22.
GneezyU.RustichiniA. (2004). Gender and competition at a young age. The American Economic Review, 94, 377–381.
23.
GuayF.ChanalJ.RatelleC. F.MarshH. W.LaroseS.BoivinM. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 711–735.
24.
HooperA. E. C.BryanA. D.HaggerM. S. (2014). What keeps a body moving? The brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism and intrinsic motivation to exercise in humans. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 1180–1192.
25.
LeeS.NiederleM.KangN. (2014). Do single-sex schools make girls more competitive?Economics Letters, 124, 474–477.
26.
LeibbrandtA.ListJ. A. (2015). Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Science, 61, 2016–2024.
27.
ManningA.SwaffieldJ. (2008). The gender gap in early-career wage growth. The Economic Journal, 118, 983–1024.
28.
McGeownS.GoodwinH.HendersonN.WrightP. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: Does sex or gender identity provide a better account?Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 328–336.
29.
Montiel OleaJ. L.PfluegerC. (2013). A robust test for weak instruments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31, 358–369.
30.
NiederleM.VesterlundL. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1067–1101.
31.
NiederleM.VesterlundL. (2011). Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 601–630.
32.
OrsE.PalominoF.PeyracheE. (2013). Performance gender gap: Does competition matter?Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 443–499.
33.
PfluegerC. E.WangS. (2015). A robust test for weak instruments in Stata. The Stata Journal, 15, 216–225.
34.
TomaM. (2017). Missed shots at the free-throw line: Analyzing the determinants of choking under pressure. Journal of Sports Economics, 18, 539–559.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
