Numerous amateur sporting events have grown significantly in stature and interest in the past several years. Moreover, these events have realized significant economic benefits for their respective communities. In an attempt to identify the key determinants of economic impact, this article offers numerous comparative economic impact data for amateur sporting events. The comparisons are across various categories, including the same event in different cities, the same city but different events, women’s versus men’s events, and events involving junior athletes compared to those involving senior athletes. Collectively, these comparisons demonstrate that the number and origin of nonlocal visitors, the proximity of teams involved, visitor spending patterns, length of stay, and operational and organizational expenditures by nonlocal entities affiliated with events are the largest determinants of economic impact for a given event.
ACC basketball tournament delivers big dollars to Georgia. (2002). Retrieved from http://www.metroatlantachamber.com
2.
Agha, N. (2002). Choosing the optimal area of economic impact. Sports economics Perspectives, 1, (2), 1-17.
3.
Baade, R., & Matheson, V. (2000). High octane? Grading the economic impact of the Daytona 500. Marquette Sports Law Journal, 10, 401-415.
4.
Baade, R., & Matheson, V. (2001). Home run or wild pitch? Assessing the economic impact of major league baseball’s All-Star Game. Journal of Sports Economics, 2(4), 307-327.
5.
Crompton, J. (1995). Economic impact analysis of sports facilities and events: Eleven sources of misapplication. Journal of Sport Management, 9 (1), 14-35.
6.
Crompton, J., & Lee, S. (2000). The economic impact of 30 sports tournaments, festivals, and spectator events in seven U.S. cities. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18, 107-126.
7.
Garvey, M. (2002). Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl celebrates 35 years. Retrieved from http://www.peachbowl.com/pressbox_anniversary.html
8.
Gibson, H., Willming, C., & Holdnak, A. (2002). We’re Gators... not just Gator fans: Serious leisure and University of Florida football. Journal of Leisure Research, 34,397-425.
9.
Hinch, T., & Higham, J. (2001). Sport tourism: A framework for research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3, 45-58.
10.
Hudson, I. (2001). The use and misuse of economic impact analysis. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 25, 20-39.
11.
Jones, C. (2001). Mega-events and host-region impacts: Determining the true worth of the 1999 Rugby World Cup. International Journal of Tourism Research, 1, 241-251.
12.
Lee, J. (2002). Final 4 impact set at 59.6M. Street & Smith’s Sports business Journal, 5, 7.
13.
Porter, P. (1999). Mega-sports events as municipal investments: A critique of impact analysis. In J. Fizel, E. Gustafson, & L. Hadley (Eds.), Sports economics: Current research (pp. 61-73). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
Porter, P. (2001). Super Bowl impact figures a super stretch. Street & Smith’s Sportsbusiness Journal, 3, 31.
15.
Rosentraub, M. (2000). The economic value of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway to central Indiana. Report to the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Corporation, Indianapolis, IN.
