Detailed gambling market data are used to investigate allegations of pointshaving in college basketball by Wolfers. Data on actual sportsbook betting percentages on favorites and underdogs and changes in pointspreads are used to test for evidence of corruption by players and/or coaches of NCAA basketball teams. After establishing a rejection of the balanced book hypothesis, the authors test for corruption in a variety of ways by investigating the games that Wolfers describes as likely situations for pointshaving, specifically games involving big underdogs. In a variety of tests, which include differences in betting percentages on big underdogs who cover and do not cover the pointspread, betting simulations based on thresholds of percentage bet on underdogs, analysis of pointspread movements toward big underdogs, and an analysis of coaches and programs that meet the conditions of Wolfers, little evidence is found to suggest rampant pointshaving in this market.
Balsdon, E., Fong, L., & Thayer, M.A. ( 2007). Corruption in college basketball? Evidence of tanking in postseason conference tournaments. Journal of Sports Economics , 8, 19-38.
2.
Bassett, G.W. Jr. ( 1981). Point spreads versus odds. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 752-768.
3.
Borghesi, R. ( 2008). Widespread corruption in sports gambling: Fact or fiction ? Southern Economic Journal, 74, 1063-1069.
4.
Dare, W.H., & MacDonald, S.S. (1996). A generalized model for testing the home and favorite team advantage in point spread markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 295-318.
5.
Dietl, H.M., Lang, M., & Werner, S. ( 2009, online). Corruption in professional Sumo: An update on the study of Duggan and Levitt. Journal of Sports Economics, OnlineFirst, November 11, 2009. doi:10.1177/1527002509349028.
6.
Duggan, M., & Levitt, S.D. ( 2002). Winning isn’t everything: Corruption in Sumo wrestling . The American Economic Review, 92, 1594-1605.
Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. ( 2003). Sport and gambling. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 598-611.
9.
Gandar, J., Dare, W., Brown, C., & Zuber, R. ( 1998). Informed traders and price variations in the betting market for professional basketball games. Journal of Finance , 53, 384-401.
10.
Gandar, J., Zuber R., & Johnson, R.S. ( 2004). A reexamination of the efficiency of the betting market on national hockey league games. Journal of Sports Economics , 5, 152-168.
11.
Gandar, J., Zuber, R., Johnson, R.S., & Dare, W. ( 2002). Re-examining the betting market on major league baseball games: Is there a reverse favorite-longshot bias? Applied Economics, 34, 1309-1317.
12.
Gil, R. & Levitt, S.D. ( 2007). Testing the Efficiency of Markets in the 2002 World Cup . Journal of Prediction Markets, 1(3), 255-270.
13.
Levitt, S. ( 2004). Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets? The Economic Journal, 114, 223-246.
14.
Paul, R.J., & Weinbach, A.P. (2005a). Market efficiency and NCAA college basketball gambling. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 403-408.
15.
Paul, R.J., & Weinbach, A.P. (2005b). Bettor misperceptions in the NBA: The overbetting of large favorites and the ‘‘Hot Hand’’ , Journal of Sports Economics, 6, 390-400.
16.
Paul, R., & Weinbach, A. ( 2007). Does sportsbook.com set pointspreads to maximize profits? Tests of the Levitt model of sportsbook behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 209-218.
17.
Paul, R., & Weinbach, A. ( 2008). Price setting in the NBA gambling market: Tests of the Levitt model of sportsbook behavior. International Journal of Sports Finance, 3, 2-18.
18.
Paul, R.J., & Weinbach, A.P. (2009). Sportsbook behavior in the NCAA football betting market: tests of the traditional and levitt models of sportsbook behavior. The Journal of Prediction Markets , 3, 21-37.
19.
Paul, R.J., Weinbach, A.P., & Weinbach, C. ( 2003). Fair bets and profitability in college football gambling . Journal of Economics and Finance. 27, 236-242.
20.
Preston, I., & Szymanski, S. ( 2003). Cheating in contests. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 612-624.
21.
Roxborough, R., & Rhoden, M. ( 1998). Sports book management: A guide for the legal book-maker . Las Vegas, NV: Las Vegas Sports Consultants.
22.
Shin, H.S. ( 1991). Optimal betting odds against insider traders. The Economic Journal, 101, 1179-1185.
23.
Shin, H.S. ( 1992). Prices of state contingent claims with insider traders, and the favourite-longshot bias. The Economic Journal, 102, 426-435.
24.
Smith, M.A., Paton, D., & Vaughan Williams, L. (2009). Do bookmakers possess superior skills to bettors in predicting outcomes?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71, 539-549.
25.
Wolfers, J. ( 2006). Pointshaving: Corruption in NCAA basketball. American Economic Review, 96, 279-283.
26.
Woodland, L., & Woodland, B.M. (1994). Market efficiency and the favorite longshot bias: The baseball betting market. Journal of Finance, 49, 269-280.
27.
Woodland, L.M., & Woodland, B.M. (2001). Market efficiency and profitable wagering in the national hockey league: Can bettors score on longshots?. Southern Economic Journal, 67, 983-995.
