Abstract The last hour of betting for the wagering market in the National Football League (NFL) was examined. In a sample of offshore sportsbooks, nearly a quarter of all bets on NFL games occured in the last hour before kickoff. Bets were shown not to be balanced between each side of the betting proposition. When the betting percentage on the favorite increases in the last hour of betting, there is a simple strategy that has shown to earn statistically significant profits: betting against the public by wagering on the underdog. Unlike horse racing, in which informed bettors are assumed to wager late (near post time), money wagered near the kickoff of NFL action does not appear to be the actions of informed agents, but rather they are recreational bettors behaving simply as consumers.
GandarJ., DareW., BrownC., & ZuberR. (1998). Informed traders and price variations in the betting market for professional basketball games.Journal of Finance, 53, 385–401.
4.
GandarJ., ZuberR., & DareW. (2000). The search for informed traders in the totals betting market for National Basketball Association games.Journal of Sports Economics, 1, 177–186.
5.
GolecJ., & TamarkinM. (1991). The degree of price inefficiency in the football betting markets.Journal of Financial Economics, 30, 311–23.
6.
GrayP., & GrayS. (1997). Testing market efficiency: Evidence from the NFL sports betting market.Journal of Finance, 52, 1725–37.
7.
LevittS. (2004). Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets?The Economic Journal, 114, 223–46.
8.
OttavianiM., & SorensenP. (2005). The timing of bets and the favorite-longshot bias. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
OttavianiM., & SorensenP. (2008). The favorite-longshot bias: An overview of the main explanations in Hausch and Ziemba (Eds.).Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10.
PankoffL. (1968). Market efficiency and football betting.Journal of Business, 41, 203–214. PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2008a). Does sportsbook.com set pointspreads to maximize profits?
11.
Tests of the Levitt model of sportsbook behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 209–218.
12.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2008b). Price setting in the NBA gambling market: Tests of the Levitt model of sportsbook behavior.International Journal of Sports Finance, 3, 2–18.
13.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2009). Sportsbook behavior in the NCAA football betting market: Tests of the traditional and Levitt models of sportsbook behavior.Journal of Prediction Markets, 3, 21–37.
14.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2010). Sportsbook Pricing and the Behavioral Biases of Bettors in the NHL.Journal of Economics and Finance. Forthcoming.
15.
PaulR., & WeinbachA. (2011). Bettor biases and price setting by sportsbooks in the NFL: Further tests of the Levitt hypothesis of sportsbook behavior.Applied Economics Letters, 18, 193–197.
16.
SauerR., BrajerV., FerrisS., & MarrM. (1988). Hold your bets: Another look at the efficiency of the gambling market for National Football League games.Journal of Political Economy, 96, 206–13.
17.
ZuberR., GandarJ., & BowersB. (1985). Beating the spread: Testing the efficiency of the gambling market for National Football League games.Journal of Political Economy, 93, 800–6.
