Win or Go Home: Why College Football Coaches Get Fired

Abstract

Models of dismissals of sports executives frequently ignore the development of expectations regarding performance. The author explores the interplay between these expectations and the coach’s tenure by examining dismissals of college football head coaches from 1983 to 2006. Using a discrete-time hazard model, the author demonstrates that schools use prior performance in two ways: to evaluate the ability of the coach and to establish performance standards for retention. As recent performance is more relevant for estimating ability, the author shows that stronger recent performances decrease the chance of dismissal but stronger historic performances increase the chance of dismissal. Results describe a continual learning process on the part of schools. The author also considers the effects of race, insider-ness, rivalries, and rules violations on retention.

Keywords

college football coaches dismissals expectation formation discrete-time hazard

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, M.P. , Panian, S.K. , & Lotz, R.E. ( 1979, June). Managerial succession and organizational performance: A recalcitrant problem revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly , 24, 167-180.

Audas, R. , Dobson, S. , & Goddard, J. ( 1999). Organizational performance and managerial turnover. Managerial and Decision Economics, 20, 305-318.

Audas, R. , Dobson, S. , & Goddard, J. ( 2002). The impact of managerial change on team performance in professional sports. Journal of Economics and Business, 54, 633-650.

Brown, M.C. ( 1982, March). Administrative succession and organizational performance: The succession effect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 1-16.

Fizel, J.L. , & D’itri, M.P. (1997, June). Managerial efficiency, managerial succession and organizational performance. Management and Decision Economics, 18, 295-308.

Frederickson, J.W. , Hambrick, D.C. , & Baumrin, S. ( 1988, April). A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 13, 255-270.

Grusky, O. ( 1963, July). Managerial success and organizational efficiency . The American Journal of Sociology, 69, 21-31.

Kahn, L. ( 2006, May). Race, performance, pay, and retention among National Basketball Association head coaches. Journal of Sports Economics , 7, 119-149.

Koning, R.H. ( 2003). An econometric evaluation of the effect of firing a coach on team performance. Applied Economics, 35, 555-564.

10.

MacCambridge, M. (Ed.). (2005). ESPN college football encyclopedia: The complete history of the game. New York, NY: ESPN Books.

11.

Madden, J.F. ( 2004, February). Difference in the success of NFL coaches by race, 1990-2002: Evidence of last hire, first fire. Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 6-19.

12.

Mixon, F.G. , & Treviño, L.J. (2004). How race affects dismissals of college football coaches. Journal of Labor Research, 25, 645-656.

13.

Nelson, P.J. ( 1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311-329.

14.

Pfeffer, J. , & Davis-Blake, A. (1986). Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 72-83.

15.

Pregibon, D. ( 1980). Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models . Applied Statistics, 29, 15-24.

16.

Scully, G.W. ( 1994). Managerial efficiency and survivability in professional team sports. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15, 403-411.

17.

Shen, W. , & Cannella, A.A. (2002, December). Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1198-1206.

18.

Tsai, W.-H. , Hung, J.-H. , Kuo, Y.-C. , & Kuo, L. ( 2006, March). CEO tenure in Taiwanese family and nonfamily firms: An agency theory perspective. Family Business Review, 19, 11-28.

19.

Zhang, Y. ( 2006, December). The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 283-300.