Top management pay and firm size has been well documented. We explore a variation of this relationship by extending it to college sports. College football is big business, and many college football programs operate as large corporations with the head coach acting as a member of top management—similar to the COO—of the football program. Using data from 2006-2012, we examine the causal relationship between a head coach's school pay, past performance, and football program size. Our results indicate the most important determinant of a head coach's pay is the total revenue generated by the football program.
BerriD. J., LeedsM. A., LeedsE. M., & MondelloM. (2009). The role of managers in team performance.International Journal of Sport Finance, 4, 75–93.
3.
BridgewaterS., KahnL., & GoodallA. (2009). Substitution between managers and subordinates: Evidence from British football. Working paper. National Centre for Econometric Research.
4.
CordeiroJ. J., & VeliyathR. (2003). Beyond pay for performance: A panel study of the determinants of CEO compensation.American Business Review, 21, 56–66.
HadleyL., PoitrasM., RuggieroJ., & KnowlesS. (2000). Performance evaluation of national football league teams.Managerial and Decision Economics, 21, 63–70.
7.
HambrickD., & D'AveniR. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downtrend spiral of large corporate bankruptcies.Management Science, 38, 1145–1466.
8.
HeymanF. (2005). Pay inequality and firm performance: Evidence from matched employeremployee data.Applied Economics, 37, 1311–1327.
HumphreyP. (2011). Determinants of top management compensation: The case of NCAA football head coaches.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
11.
HumphreysB. R. (2000). Equal pay on the hardwood: The earnings gap between male and female NCAA Division I basketball coaches.Journal of Sports Economics, 1, 299–307.
12.
KahnL. M. (1993). Managerial quality, team success and individual player performance in Major League Baseball.Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 46, 531–547.
13.
KahnL. M. (2007). Markets: Cartel behavior and amateurism in college sports.The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 209–226.
14.
KaplanS. (2008). Are U.S. CEOs overpaid? Academy of Management Perspectives, May, 5-20. MixonF. G., & TrevioL. J. (2004). How race affects dismissals of college football coaches. Journal of Labor Research, 25, 645-656.
15.
O'ReillyC., & MainB. (2005). Setting the CEO's pay: Economic and psychological perspectives.Research Paper No. 1912, September 2005, Research Paper Series, Stanford Graduate School of Business.
16.
SperberM. (2001). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York, NY: Holt Paperbacks.
17.
TosiH. L., WernerS., KatzJ. P., & Gomez-MejiaL. R., (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies.Journal of Management, 26, 301–340.
18.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
19.
WrightP., KrollM., & ElenkovE. (2002). Acquisition returns, increase in firm size, and chief executive officer compensation: The moderating role of monitoring.Academy of Management Journal, 45, 599–609.
20.
ZhouX. (2000). CEO pay, firm size, and corporate performance: Evidence from Canada.Canadian Journal of Economics, 33, 213–251.
