Finding Consensus on Dialysis Access Stent-Graft Utilisation Strategies in Symptomatic Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Access: A Modified Delphi Study With European Experts

Abstract

Purpose:

The algorithm of treatment for dysfunctional haemodialysis vascular access (VA) varies significantly between centres, and the role of stent-grafts is not yet standardised. A multidisciplinary panel of European experts on VA was convened, with the aim of finding consensus on stent-graft strategies in symptomatic dysfunctional VA using a modified Delphi approach.

Methods:

A modified 3-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of 12 European experts from high-volume dialysis access practices across multiple specialties (5 vascular surgeons, 5 interventional radiologists, 1 transplant surgeon and 1 nephrologist). Round 1 involved semi-structured interviews to identify key parameters. Round 2 assessed extent of expert agreement to the statements or if neutral. Round 3 allowed experts to revise responses after viewing anonymised panel results. To highlight gradations of consensus, a grading system (A–D) was applied based on agreement or disagreement, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement.

Results:

Each expert voted on the 57 statements on treatment considerations relating to optimal stent-graft utilisation; patient background; vascular occlusive pathology; considerations specific to the graft-venous anastomosis, cephalic arch and thoracic central vein stenoses; general treatment considerations with stent-grafts; and a summary treatment algorithm by anatomical location. The analysis revealed strong consensus across multiple domains, with 81% of statements (46/57) achieving ≥75% agreement. An expert panel consensus (≥75% agreement) on the use of stent-graft was found for the treatment of graft-venous anastomosis, recurrent restenosis in the central venous system, in-stent stenosis in previously-placed bare metal stents, and restenosis of the cannulation zone if to be abandoned. All 12 experts completed 3 rounds (100% retention). Response stability was high with only 3 experts adjusting 11 responses (1.6%) between rounds regarding 9 statements that changed the overall consensus level of the panel.

Conclusions:

Based on the elevated strength and high consistency of this international multidisciplinary expert-based Delphi consensus, most of the statements might guide the current stent-graft strategies of dysfunctional VA, including practical recommendations on best practice using stent-grafts.

Visual Abstract

This is a visual representation of the abstract.

Keywords

dialysis access revision stent-graft treatment algorithm in dialysis access revision haemodialysis dysfunctional haemodialysis vascular access

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lok

Huber

Lee

, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4):S1–S164. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001

Shaikh

Albalas

Desiraju

, et al. The role of stents in hemodialysis vascular access. J Vasc Access. 2023;24(1):107–116. doi:10.1177/11297298211015069

Vogel

Parise

. SMART stent for salvage of hemodialysis access grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(10):1051-1060. doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000129915.48500.DC

Schmidli

Widmer

Basile

, et al. Editor’s choice – vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(6):757–818. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.001

Barrett

Heale

. What are Delphi studies? Evid Based Nurs. 2020;23(3):68–69. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303

Pasqui

Galzerano

Lazzeri

, et al. Central venous stenosis and occlusion in dialysis patients: a technical and outcome-based analysis of endovascular intervention [published ahead of print January 7, 2026]. J Endovasc Ther. doi:10.1177/15266028251408988

Falk

Maya

Yevzlin

, et al. A prospective, randomized study of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis in arteriovenous grafts and fistulae: two-year results of the rescue study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(10):1465–1476. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.014

Haskal

Dolmatch

. Hemodialysis access stent graft trials: past, present, and future. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023;46(9):1154–1161. doi:10.1007/s00270-023-03389-y

Lee

Hsieh

Luo

, et al. Use of the Viabahn covered stent for the treatment of venous rupture during interventions of dysfunctional or thrombosed hemodialysis vascular access. J Vasc Access. 2021;22(5):759–766. doi:10.1177/1129729820961955

10.

El Kassem

Alghamdi

Vazquez-Padron

, et al. The role of endovascular stents in dialysis access maintenance. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22(6):453–458. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2015.02.001

11.

Shemesh

Goldin

Olsha

. Stent grafts for treatment of cannulation zone stenosis and arteriovenous graft venous anastomosis. J Vasc Access. 2017;18(suppl 1):S47–S52. doi:10.5301/jva.5000680

12.

Haskal

Trerotola

Dolmatch

, et al. Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):494–503. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902045

13.

Haskal

. Twelve month results of the RENOVA trial: a prospective multicenter randomized, concurrently-controlled comparison of the Flair® endovascular stent graft vs. balloon angioplasty in dialysis access grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(4):S5. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.01.016

14.

Haskal

Saad

Hoggard

, et al. Prospective, randomized, concurrently-controlled study of a stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of arteriovenous access graft stenosis: 2-year results of the RENOVA study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1105–1114. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.019

15.

Mohr

Sheen

Roy-Chaudhury

, et al. Clinical and economic benefits of stent grafts in dysfunctional and thrombosed hemodialysis access graft circuits in the revise randomized trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(2):203–211. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.006

16.

Himmelfarb

Vanholder

Mehrotra

, et al. The current and future landscape of dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(10):573–585. doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0315-4

17.

Adwaney

Lim

Blakey

, et al. Central venous stenosis, access outcome and survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. CJASN. 2019;14(3):378–384. doi:10.2215/CJN.07010618

18.

Rajan

Clark

Patel

, et al. Prevalence and treatment of cephalic arch stenosis in dysfunctional autogenous hemodialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(5):567–573. doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000071090.76348.BC

19.

Copeland

Hye

Lawrence

, et al. Association of race and ethnicity with vascular access type selection and outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:142–147. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.068

20.

Rajan

Falk

. A randomized prospective study comparing outcomes of angioplasty versus viabahn stent-graft placement for cephalic arch stenosis in dysfunctional hemodialysis accesses. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(9):1355–1361. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.001

21.

Dolmatch

Cabrera

Pergola

, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study comparing a self-expanding covered stent to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of upper extremity hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula stenosis. Kidney Int. 2023;104(1):189–200. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.03.015

22.

Cahalane

Abboud

Kawai

, et al. Stent diameter, not cephalic arch anatomy, predicts stent graft patency in cephalic arch stenosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022;33(11):1321–1328.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2022.07.014

23.

Echefu

Shivangi

Dukkipati

, et al. Contemporary review of management techniques for cephalic arch stenosis in hemodialysis. Ren Fail. 2023;45(1):2176166. doi:10.1080/0886022X.2023.2176166

24.

Park

Jung

Hwang

, et al. Outcomes of surgical and endovascular treatment for cephalic arch stenosis in proximal arteriovenous fistula. Vasc Specialist Int. 2024;40:13. doi:10.5758/vsi.240015

25.

Yang

, et al. A prospective randomized study of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with prosthetic graft outflow stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(2):546–553. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.062

26.

Kingsmore

Stevenson

Thomson

, et al. Pre-emptive or reactive treatment, angioplasty or stent-graft? The outcome for interventions for venous stenosis in early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts. J Vasc Access. 2023;24(2):253–260. doi:10.1177/11297298211029413

27.

MacRae

Dipchand

Oliver

, et al. Arteriovenous access failure, stenosis, and thrombosis. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016;3:2054358116669126. doi:10.1177/2054358116669126

28.

Nassar

Beathard

Rhee

, et al. Management of transposed arteriovenous fistula swing point stenosis at the basilic vein angle of transposition by stent grafts. J Vasc Access. 2017;18(6):482–487. doi:10.5301/jva.5000770

29.

Rajan

Sidhu

Noel-Lamy

, et al. Elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis accesses: does it actually occur and is it clinically relevant. Radiology. 2016;279(3):961–967. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150991

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.02 MB

0.00 MB