Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients of Advanced Age

Abstract

Purpose:

Treatment decisions for the elderly with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are challenging. With advancing age, the risk of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) increases while life expectancy decreases, which may nullify the benefit of EVAR. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of EVAR on 1-year mortality in patients of advanced age.

Materials and Methods:

The 2003–2020 Vascular Quality Initiative Database was utilized to identify patients who underwent EVAR for AAAs. Patients were included if they were 80 years of age or older. Exclusions included non-elective surgery or missing aortic diameter data. Predicted 1-year mortality of untreated AAAs was calculated based on a validated comorbidity score that predicts 1-year mortality (Gagne Index, excluding the component associated with AAAs) plus the 1-year aneurysm-related mortality without repair. The primary outcome for the study was 1-year mortality.

Results:

A total of 11 829 patients met study criteria. The median age was 84 years [81, 86] with 9014 (76.2%) being male. Maximal AAA diameters were apportioned as follows: 39.6% were <5.5 cm, 28.6% were 5.5–5.9 cm, 21.3% were 6.0–6.9 cm, and 10.6% were ≥7.0 cm. The predicted 1-year mortality rate without EVAR was 11.9%, which was significantly higher than the actual 1-year mortality rate with EVAR (8.2%; p<0.001). The overall rate of perioperative MACE was 4.4% (n = 516). Patients with an aneurysm diameter <5.5cm had worse actual 1-year mortality rates with EVAR compared to predicted 1-year mortality rates without EVAR. In contrast, those with larger aneurysms (≥5.5cm) had better actual 1-year mortality rates with EVAR. The benefit from EVAR for those with Gagne Indices 2–5 was largely restricted to those with AAAs ≥ 7.0cm; whereas those with Gagne Indices 0–1 experience a survival benefit for AAAs larger than 5.5 cm.

Conclusion:

The current data suggest that EVAR decreases 1-year mortality rates for patients of advanced age compared to non-operative management in the elderly. However, the survival benefit is largely limited to those with Gagne Indices 0–1 with AAAs ≥ 5.5 cm and Gagne Indices 2–5 with AAAs ≥ 7.0 cm. Those of advanced age may benefit from EVAR, but realizing this benefit requires careful patient selection.

Keywords

aneurysm *abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular aneurysm repair mortality endovascular treatment/therapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Patel

Sweeting

Powell

, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2366–2374.

Lederle

Kyriakides

Stroupe

, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(22):2126–2135.

Ambler

Gohel

Mitchell

, et al. The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Statistically Corrected Operative Risk Evaluation (AAA SCORE) for predicting mortality after open and endovascular interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):35–43.

Hicks

Obeid

Arhuidese

, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians is associated with higher mortality compared with nonoctogenarians. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(4):956–965.

de Leur

Flu

, et al. Outcome of elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in elderly patients. Int J Surg. 2015;15:117–123.

Biebl

Lau

Hakaim

, et al. Midterm outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: a single institution’s experience. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(3):435–442.

Howard

DPJ

Banerjee

Fairhead

, et al. Age-specific incidence, risk factors and outcome of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms in a defined population. Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):907–915.

Cronenwett

Kraiss

Cambria

RP.

The society for vascular surgery vascular quality initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(5):1529–1537.

Gagne

Glynn

Avorn

, et al. A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):749–759.

10.

Powell

Brown

Forbes

, et al. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg. 2007;94(6):702–708.

11.

Lederle

Wilson

Johnson

, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1437–1444.

12.

Solomon

Kent

KC.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(22):2101–2108.

13.

Thompson

MM.

Controlling the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2003;90(8):897–898.

14.

Sakalihasan

Limet

Defawe

OD.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1577–1589.

15.

National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(2)(suppl 1):S1–S266.

16.

Rule

Larson

Bergstralh

, et al. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(12):929–937.

17.

Chaikof

Dalman

Eskandari

, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2–77.

18.

De Biasi

Wolfe

Carmody

, et al. Creating an age-friendly public health system. Innov Aging. 2020;4(1):igz044.

19.

Cao

De Rango

Verzini

, et al. Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(1):13–25.

20.

Ouriel

The PIVOTAL study: a randomized comparison of endovascular repair versus surveillance in patients with smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):266–269.

21.

Thompson

Brown

Sweeting

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the growth and rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for surveillance intervals and their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(41):1–118.

22.

Powell

Sweeting

Brown

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):609–618.

23.

Chang

Stein

Liu

, et al. Risk factors associated with rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery. 1997;121(2):117–122.

24.

Gloviczki

Huang

Oderich

, et al. Clinical presentation, comorbidities, and age but not female gender predict survival after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(4):853–861.

25.

Greenhalgh

Allison

Bell

PRF

, et al. Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm in patients physically ineligible for open repair. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1872–1880.

26.

Giles

Wyers

Pomposelli

, et al. The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes of open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 2005-2007. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(6):1471–1477.

27.

Saratzis

Saedon

Melas

, et al. Obesity as an independent predictor of outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(4):816–822.

28.

Davenport

Xenos

Hosokawa

, et al. The influence of body mass index obesity status on vascular surgery 30-day morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):140–147, 147.e1; discussion 147.

29.

Salomon

Mont

Mauny

Chrétien

, et al. Obesity is not an independent factor for adverse outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;33:67–74.

30.

Galyfos

Geropapas

Kerasidis

, et al. The effect of body mass index on major outcomes after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(4):1193–1207.

31.

Katsargyris

Oikonomou

Klonaris

, et al. Comparison of outcomes with open, fenestrated, and chimney graft repair of juxtarenal aneurysms: are we ready for a paradigm shift. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(2):159–169.

32.

Heng

Fagan

Collier

, et al. Peak wall stress measurement in elective and acute abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(1):17–22; discussion 22.

33.

Soto

Vila

Dilmé

, et al. Increased peak wall stress, but not maximum diameter, is associated with symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(6):706–711.

34.

Brown

Zelt

Sobolev

The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(2):280–284.