Transnational social fields and transnational social spaces are often used interchangeably to describe and analyze emergent structures of cross-border formations. In this article, we suggest measuring two key aspects of these social structures: embeddedness and span of migrants’ personal networks. While clustered graphs allow assessing transnational embeddedness, the standardized diversity index can be used to show variation in the number of countries reported in personal networks. The measures will be exemplified with the data collected in Barcelona from three groups (Chinese, Sikh, and Filipino, N = 25 in each group, 30 alters by ego).
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.JohnsonJ. C.. 2013. Analyzing social networks.London: Sage.
4.
BourdieuP.1977. Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BrandesU.LernerJ.LubbersM. J.McCartyC.MolinaJ. L.. 2008. Visual statistics for collections of clustered graphs. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, March 5–7, Kyoto, Japan. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4475458(accessed September 29, 2014).
6.
BudescuD. V.BudescuM.. 2012. How to measure diversity when you must. Psychological Methods17:215–27.
7.
BurtR. S.1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CohenJ. H.Gijón-CruzA. S.Reyes-MoralesR. G.ChickG.. 2003. Understanding transnational processes: Modeling migration outcomes in the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Field Methods15:366–85.
9.
CreswellJ. W.2003. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.
10.
DahindenJ.2005. Contesting transnationalism? Lessons from the study of Albanian migration networks from former Yugoslavia. Global Networks5:191–208.
11.
DahindenJ.2009. Are we all transnationals now? Network transnationalism and transnational subjectivity: The differing impacts of globalization on the inhabitants of a small Swiss city. Ethnic and Racial Studies32:1365–86.
12.
DahindenJ.2010. The dynamics of migrants’ transnational formations: Between mobility and locality. In Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts, theories and methods, eds. BauböckR.FaistT., 51–70. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
13.
FaistT.2000. Transnationalization in international emigration: Implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies23:189–222.
14.
FeatherstoneD.PhillipsR.WatersJ.. 2007. Introduction: Spatialities of transnational networks. Global Networks7:383–91.
15.
Glick SchillerN.BaschL.Szanton BlancC.. 1992. Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration. In Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity and nationalism reconsidered, eds. Glick SchillerN.BaschL.Szanton BlancC., 1–24. New York: New York Academy of Science.
16.
Glick SchillerN.FouronG. E.. 1999. Terrains of blood and nation: Haitian transnational social fields. Ethnic and Racial Studies22:340–66.
17.
GranovetterM. S.1985. Economic actions and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91:481–510.
18.
HannerzU.1998. Transnational research. In Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, ed. BernardH. R., 235–56. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
19.
HerzA.OlivierC.. 2012. Transnational social network analysis. Transnational Social Review—A Social Work Journal2:11–29.
20.
HoganB.CarrascoJ. A.WellmanB.. 2007. Visualizing personal networks: Working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods19:116–44.
21.
HollsteinB.2009. Qualitative approaches. In Sage handbook of social network analysis, eds. ScottJ.CarringtonP. J., 406–16. London: Sage.
22.
ItzigsohnJ.CabralC. D.MedinaE. H.VazquezO.. 1999. Mapping Dominican transnationalism: Narrow and broad transnational practices. Ethnic and Racial Studies22:316–39.
23.
KloostermanR.van der LeunJ.RathJ.. 2002. Mixed embeddedness: (In)formal economic activities and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23:252–66.
24.
KyleD.2000. Transnational peasants. Migrations, networks, and ethnicity in Andean Ecuador. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
LernerJ.BrandesU.. 2007. Comparing networks by their group structure with an application to acculturation networks. Paper presented at the 27th Sunbelt Network Conference, Corfu, Greece, May 1–6. www.egoredes.net(accessed January 28, 2013).
26.
LernerJ.BrandesU.LubbersM. J.MolinaJ. L.McCartyC.. 2008. Visualizing tendency and dispersion in collections of attributed networks. Paper presented at the 28th Sunbelt Network Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, January 24–27. www.egoredes.net(accessed January 28, 2013).
27.
LevittP.JaworskyN. B.. 2007. Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology33:129–56.
28.
LubbersM. J.MolinaJ. L.LernerJ.BrandesU.ÁvilaJ.McCartyC.. 2010. Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks32:91–104.
29.
MazzucatoV.2009. Bridging boundaries with a transnational research approach: A simultaneous matched sample methodology. In Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research, ed. FalzonM.-A., 214–32. Burlington: Ashgate.
30.
MolinaJ. L.Maya-JariegoI.McCartyC.. 2014. Giving meaning to social networks: Methodology for conducting and analyzing interviews based on personal network visualizations. In Mixed methods social networks research. Design and applications, eds. HollsteinB.DominguezS., 305–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MolinaJ. L.PelissierF., eds. 2010. Les xarxes socials de sikhs, xinesos i filipins a Barcelona[The Social Networks of Sikhs, Chinese and Filipino in Barcelona]. Barcelona: Fundació ACSAR.
32.
PolanyiK.1957. The economy as an institutionalized process. In Trade and market in the early empires, eds. PolanyiK.ArensbergC. M.PearsonH.W., 12.New York: MacMillan.
33.
PortesA.2001. Introduction: The debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks1:181–93.
34.
PortesA.SensenbrennerJ.. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration. The American Journal of Sociology98:1320–50.
35.
PriesL.1999. Migration and transnational social spaces. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
36.
SchweitzerT.1997. Embeddedness of ethnographic cases: A social networks perspective. Current Anthropology38:739–60.
37.
St. JacquesE.2009. Economic mobility and the transnational practices of West Africans in Catalonia, Spain. Ph.D. diss., Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville.
38.
UzziB.1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review61:674–98.
39.
VaccaR.2013. Bridging across nations. The social capital of diversity, brokerage and closure in transnational migrant networks: A study on assimilation patterns in Milan and Barcelona. Dissertation defended at the Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze Sociali (SCISS), Milan, Italy.
40.
VertovecS.2003. Migration and other modes of transnationalism: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. International Migration Review37:641–65.
WaldingerR.AldrichH.WardR.. 1990. Opportunities, group characteristics and strategies. In Ethnic entrepreneurs, eds. WaldingerR.HowardA.WardR., 13–49. London: Sage.
43.
WassermanS.FaustK.. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
WilliamsonO. E.1975. Markets and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: The Free Press.
45.
ZhouM.2004. Revisiting ethnic entrepreneurship: Convergencies, controversies, and conceptual advancements. International Migration Review38:1040–74.
46.
ZukinS.DiMaggioP.. 1990. Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
