Social ties are continuously being created and lost as well as changing their nature over time. We emphasize that network descriptions are specific to their particular definitions of ties. Then, we suggest that studies of change can focus on: (1) individual ties, or whole personal networks; and (2) whether ties are gained or lost, or change their characteristics over time. For each of four possible study types, we describe an ideal type, provide a concrete empirical example, and briefly describe illustrative published work. Particular networks can rarely be regarded as random samples of meaningful populations, and generalization to populations of networks requires often challenging theoretical considerations of the nature of the relevant populations, as well as statistical considerations of random sampling error. Nevertheless, systematic description of changes within particular networks provides the bases for more general understanding of processes and outcomes of changes of social networks over time.
Aartsen, M.J., T. van Tilburg, C.H.M. Smits, and K.C.P.M. Knipscheer .2004. A longitudinal study of the impact of physical and cognitive decline on the personal network in old age . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21 (2): 249—66.
2.
Belsky, J., and M. Rovine.1984. Social-network contact, family support, and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family46 (2): 455—62.
3.
Burt, R.S.2000. Decay functions. Social Networks22 (1): 1—28.
4.
Feld, S.L.1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology86 (5): 1015—35.
5.
——— 1997. Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social Networks19 (1): 91—95.
6.
Fischer, C.S.1982. To dwell among friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Gouldner, H., and M. Symons Strong .1987. Speaking of friendship: Middle-class women and their friends. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
8.
Kalmijn, M.2003. Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks25 (3): 231—49.
9.
Leik, R.K., and M.A. Chalkey.1997. On the stability of network relations under stress. Social Networks19 (1): 63—64.
10.
Magdol, L.2000. The people you know: The impact of residential mobility on mothers' social network ties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships17 (2): 183—204.
11.
Marsden, P.V.1990. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology16:435—63.
12.
Milardo, R.M.1988. Families and social networks: New perspectives on family . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Moreno, J.L.1934. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.
14.
Morgan, D., M.B. Neal, and P. Carder.1997. The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks19 (1): 9—25.
15.
Oliker, S.J.1989. Best friends and marriage: Exchange among women. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Schulz, R. and M. Rau.1985. Social support through the life course . In Social support and health, S. Cohen and S. Leonard, eds., 129—49. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
Scott, J.P.1996. Sisters in later life: Changes in contact and availability . Journal of Women & Aging8 (3—4): 41—53.
18.
Shulman, N.1975. Life cycle variations in patterns of close relationships . Journal of Marriage and the Family37 (4): 813—27.
19.
Suitor, J.J.1987a. Friendship networks in transition: Married mothers return to school. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships4 (4): 445—61.
20.
——— 1987b. Mother-daughter relations when married daughters return to school: Effects of status similarity. Journal of Marriage and Family49 (2): 435—44.
21.
——— 1988. Husbands' educational attainment and support for wives' return to school. Gender & Society2 (4): 482—95.
22.
Suitor, J.J., and S. Keeton.1997. Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women's support networks across a decade. Social Networks19 (1): 51—62.
23.
Suitor, J.J., K. Pillemer, and S. Keeton.1995. When experience counts: The effects of experiential and structural similarity on patterns of support and interpersonal stress. Social Forces73 (4): 1573—88.
24.
van der Pas, S., T. G. van Tilburg, and C.P.M. Knipscheer . In press. Changes in contact and support within intergenerational relationships in the Netherlands: A cohort and time-sequential perspective. In Interpersonal relations across the life course. Advances in life course research, Vol. 11, T. Owens and J. J. Suitor , eds. London: Elsevier Science .
25.
van Groenou, M.B., and T.G. van Tilburg .1997. Changes in the support networks of older adults in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology12 (1): 23—44.
26.
van Tilburg, T.1998. Interviewer effects in the measurement of personal network size: A non-experimental study. Sociological Methods & Research26 (3): 300—28.
27.
Wellman, B.1979. The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology84 (5): 1201—31.
28.
Wellman, B., and S. Wortley.1990. Different strokes from different folks . American Journal of Sociology96 (3): 558—88.
29.
Wellman, B., R. Yuk-lin Wong, D. Tindall, and N. Nazer.1997. A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks19 (1): 27—50.
30.
Young, M., and P. Willmott.1957. Family and kinship in EastLondon. Glencoe, IL: Free Press .
