This collaborative autoethnography describes the multiple subject positions and dynamics of our identities as transnational female teacher educators. Decolonizing mainstream epistemology and research tradition, we explore a unique dialogic research process called the suda methodology. The aims are twofold. First, to theorize suda as our framework as well as a research methodology, we explain, describe, and construct the meanings of suda, which is derived from Korean cultural background. Second, we show our suda sessions and discuss how the suda approach helped us challenge against mainstream epistemology, which is also a journey to build our academic home in a rhizomatic way.
BhattacharyaK. (2016). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 309–321.
5.
BiestaG. J. J. (2007). Towards the knowledge democracy? Knowledge production and the civic role of the university. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(5), 467–479.
6.
BlochM. (2013). Reconceptualizing theory/policy/curriculum/pedagogy in early child (care and) education: Reconcep-tualizing Early Childhood Education (RECE) 1991-2012. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood, 11(1), 65–85.
ChapdelaineR. F.AlexitchL. R. (2004). Social skills difficulty: Model of culture shock for international graduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 45(2), 167–184.
9.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum.
10.
de Sousa SantosB. (2007). Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges. Review, 30, 45–89.
11.
ErichsenE. A.BolligerD. U. (2011). Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 309–326. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9161-6
12.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 1–13). Blackwell.
15.
HeiderK. (1975). What do people do? Dani auto-ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 31(1), 3–17.
16.
HernandezK. C.NgunjiriF. W.ChangH. (2015). Exploiting the margins in higher education: A collaborative autoethnography of three foreign-born female faculty of color. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(5), 533–551.
17.
Hernandez-SacaD.MartinJ.MeachamS. (2020). The hidden elephant is oppression: Shaming, mobbing, and institutional betrayals within the academy-Finding strength in collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 16(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1727430
18.
JespersenO. (1922). Language: It’s nature, development, and origin. Allen & Unwin.
19.
KashyapN. B. (2011). Graduate international students’ social experiences examined through their transient lives: A phenomenological study at a private research university in the United States. College and University, 87(1), 18–24.
20.
LakoffR. (1975). Language and women’s place. Harper & Row.
21.
LiW.CollinsC. S. (2014). Chinese doctoral student socialization in the United States: A qualitative study. Forum For International Research in Education, 1(2), 32–57. http://preserve.lehigh.edu/fire/vol1/iss2/3
MorissonA. (2017). A typology of places in the knowledge economy: Towards the fourth place. In Smart innovation, system and technologies. Springer. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3056754
24.
OhS. (2005). Yes, let’s Suda: Social psychological analysis of Suda [그래, 수다로 풀자]. Woongjin.
25.
OldenburgR. (1989). The great good place: Café, coffee shops, community cents, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House Publishers.
26.
OldenburgR.BrissettD. (1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4), 265–284.
27.
PérezM. S.SaavedraC. M. (2017). A call for onto-epistemological diversity in early childhood education and care: Centering global south conceptualizations of childhood/s. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 1–29.
28.
RubinD. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511–531.
29.
RubinD.SmithK. (1990). Effects of accent, ethnicity, and lecture topic on undergraduates; perceptions of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 337–353.
30.
SandersJ. Y.ParsonsS. C.MwavitaM.ThomasK. (2015). A collaborative autoethnography of literacy professional development work in a high-needs environment. Studying Teacher Education, 11(3), 228–245. http://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1071251
31.
SandmannL.SaltmarshJ.O’MearaK. (2008). An integrated model for advancing the scholarship of engagement: Creating academic homes for the engaged scholar. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), 47–64.
TriceA. G. (2007). Faculty perspectives regarding graduate international students’ isolation from host national students. International Education Journal, 8(1), 108–117.
