The debate on the limits and relevance of the different name generators comes with the development of social network studies. The core questions are: What are they supposed to construct? For what research question? Some procedures tend to choose a precise target with a unique name generator; others prefer to use a series of name generators. The authors discuss here some specificities and advantages of these methods for ego-centered networks. The authors then present the ‘‘contextual’’ name generator, which was developed in longitudinal qualitative panel studies in France and Québec. This tool gives access to a great variety of information focused on sociological questions. Its original design differentiates two complementary stages to distinguish the global contexts-based network from specific resource-based networks. This tool remains flexible and may be adapted to different topics.
Bailey, S., and P.V. Marsden.1999. Interpretation and interview context: Examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods . Social Networks21:287-309.
2.
Barnes, J.1954. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations7:39-58.
3.
Barrera, M.1980. A method for the assessment of social support networks in community survey research. Connections3:8-13.
4.
Bernard, H.R., E.C. Johnsen, P.D. Killworth, C. McCarty, G.A. Shelley, and S. Robinson.1990. Comparing four different methods for measuring personal social networks. Social Networks12:179-215.
5.
Bernard, H.R., G.A. Shelley, and P. Killworth.1987. How much of a network does the GSS and RSW dredge up? Social Networks9:49-61.
6.
Bidart, C.1997. L’amitié, un lien social, Paris: La découverte. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00197849/fr/ (accessed September 27, 2010).
7.
Bidart, C.1999. Les âges de l’amitié: Cours de la vie et formes de socialisation. In Amitiés, anthropologie et histoire, ed. G. Ravis-Giordani, 421-35. Aix en Provence, France: Presses de l’Université de Provence.
8.
Bidart, C.2006. Social networks and social integration panel, a longitudinal survey. The processes of entering adult life, starting work, and developing social networks. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00164797 (accessed September 27, 2010).
9.
Bidart, C., in collaboration with P. Cacciuttolo.2008. Dynamiques des réseaux personnels et processus de socialisation: Évolutions et influences des entourages lors des transitions vers la vie adulte. Revue Française de Sociologie49:559-83.
10.
Bidart, C., in collaboration with P. Cacciuttolo.2009. En búsqueda del contenido de las redes sociales: Los ‘‘móviles’’ de las relaciones. REDES, Revista Hispana para el Analysis de Redes Sociales16. http://revista-redes.rediris.es/pdf-vol16/vol16_7.pdf (Spanish) (accessed September 27, 2010).
11.
http://revista-redes.rediris.es/pdf-vol16/vol16_7f.pdf (French) (accessed September 27, 2010).
12.
Bidart, C., and D. Lavenu.2005. Evolutions of personal networks and life events. Social Networks27:359-76.
13.
Bourdon S., J. Charbonneau, L. Cournoyer, and L. Lapostolle.2007. Famille, réseaux et persévérance au collégial, Phase 1. Research report submitted to FQRSC/MELS.
14.
Burt, R.S.1984. Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks6:293-339.
15.
Campbell, K.E., and B.A. Lee.1991. Name Generator in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks13:203-21.
16.
Charbonneau, J.2003. Adolescentes et mères. Histoires de maternité précoce et soutien du réseau social. Québec , Canada: P.U.L.
17.
Charbonneau, J., A. Germain , and M. Molgat, eds. 2009. Habiter seul: Un nouveau mode de vie?Québec, Canada: P.U.L.
18.
Charbonneau, J., and M. Turcotte.2003. Les réseaux sociaux. In Connaître, débattre et décider. La contribution d’une enquête socioéconomique et de santé intégrée et longitudinale (ESSIL), eds. P. Bernard , S. Bourdon, J. Charbonneau, A.-P. Contandriopoulos , A. Drapeau, D. Helly, P. Lefebvre, and G. Paquet, 173-97. Québec, Canada: I.S.Q. and I.N.S.P.Q.
19.
Crenner, E., and C. Rowenczyk.1997. Les indicateurs sociaux au coeur de l’EPCV. Courrier des statistiques83-84:89-94.
20.
Cutrona, C.E.1984. Social support and stress in the transition to parenthood . Journal of Abnormal Psychology93:378-90.
21.
de Baillencourt, T., T. Beauvisage, F. Granjon, and Z. Smoreda.2010. Extended sociability and relational capital management: Interweaving ICTs and social relations. In Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together or Tearing Us Apart?, eds. R. Ling and S. W. Campbell , Piscataway, NJ: Transactions .
22.
Degenne, A., and M. Forsé .1994. Les réseaux sociaux . Paris: Berlin.
23.
Feld, S.1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology86:1015-35.
24.
Ferrand, A., and A. de Federico de la Rua .2005. Methods of social network analysis. In Demography: Analysis and synthesis, vol. 4, eds. G. Caselli, J. Vallin, and G Wunsch, 745-64. London : Elsevier Academic Press.
25.
Fischer, C.S.1982. To dwell among friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Forsé, M.1981. La sociabilité. Économie et statistique132:39-48.
27.
Forsé, M.1991. Les réseaux de sociabilité: Un état des lieux. L’année sociologique41:247-62.
28.
Fu, Y.2007. Contacts diaries: Building archives of actual and comprehensive personal networks. Field Methods19:194-217.
29.
General Social Survey.1985. www.norc.org/GSS+website (accessed September 27, 2010).
30.
Godechot, O.2000. Plus d’amis, plus proches? Essai de comparaison de deux enquêtes peu comparables, INSEE Document No. 04. Paris. Working paper. http://olivier.godechot.free.fr/hopfichiers/compar.pdf (accessed September 27, 2010).
31.
Green, B.L., and A. Rodgers.2001. Determinants of social support among low-income mothers: A longitudinal analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology29:419-41.
32.
Grossetti, M.2002. Relations sociales, espace et mobilités. Research report submitted to Plan Urbanisme Construction Architecture.
33.
Grossetti, M.2007. Are French networks different? Social Networks29:391-404.
34.
Héran, F.1988. La sociabilité, une pratique culturelle. Économie et statistique216:3-22.
35.
International Social Survey Program.1997. www.issp.org (Accessed September, 27, 2010).
36.
Killworth, P.D., and H.R. Bernard.1978/1979. The reversal small-world experiment. Social Networks1:159-92.
37.
Laumann, E.1966. Prestige and association in an urban community. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
38.
Leffler, A.R., S. Krannich, and D. Gillespie.1986. Contact, support, and friction- Three faces of network in community life. Sociological Perspectives29:337-55.
39.
Licoppe, C., and Z. Smoreda.2005. Are social networks technologically embedded? How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology . Social Networks3:317-35.
40.
Lin, N., Y. Fu, and R.M. Hsung.2001. The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In Social capital: Theory and research, eds. N. Lin, K. Cook, and R. Burt, 57-81. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
41.
Marin, A.2004. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks26:289-307.
42.
Marin, A., and K.N. Hampton.2007. Simplifying the personal network name generator: Alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators . Field Methods19:163-93.
43.
Marsden, P.V.1987. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review52:122-31.
44.
Marsden, P.V.2005. Recent development in network measurement. In Models and methods in social network analysis, eds. P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, and S. Wesserman, 8-31. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
McCallister, L., and C.S. Fischer.1978. An approach for surveying personal networks . Sociological Methods & Research7:131-48.
46.
McCarty, C., H.R. Bernard, P.D. Killworth, G.A. Shelley, and S.C. Johnsen.1997. Eliciting representative samples of personal networks. Social Networks19: 303-23.
47.
McCarty, C., J.L. Molina, C. Aguilar, and L. Rota.2007. A comparison of social network mapping and personal network visualization. Field Methods19:145-62.
48.
Mead, G.H.1934/1963. L’esprit, le soi et la société . Paris: PUF.
49.
Milardo, R. M., ed. 1988. Families and social networks. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
50.
Milgram, S.1967. The small world problem. Psychology Today1:61-67.
51.
Poirier, C., and N. Lavoie , J. Charbonneau, eds. 2006. La sociabilité et les soutiens des jeunes: Comparaisons des réseaux des participants au Projet Qualification des jeunes et de collégiens. Report given at the Association des Centres jeunesse du Québec.
52.
Polansky, N.A., P.W. Ammons, and J.M. Gaudin, Jr.1985. Loneliness and isolation in child neglect. Social Casework66:38-47.
53.
Pool, I., and M. Kochen.1978. Contacts and influence. Social Networks1:5-51.
54.
Ruan, D.1998. The content of the General Social Survey discussion networks: An exploration of General Social Survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context. Social Networks20:247-64.
55.
Smoreda, Z., and F. Thomas.2001. Social networks and residential ICT adoption and use, EURESCOM Summit. ‘‘3G technologies and applications,’’Heidelberg, Germany, November:12-15.
56.
Straits, B.C.2000. Ego’s important discussants or significant people: An experiment in varying the wording of personal network name generators. Social Networks22:123-40.
57.
Tracy, E.M.1990. Identifying social support resources of at-risk families . Social Work35:252-58.
58.
Van der Gaag, M., and T.A.B. Snijders .2005. The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks27:1-29.
59.
van der Poel, M.G.M.1993. Delineating personal support network. Social Networks15:49-70.
60.
Wellman, B.1979. The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology84:1201-31.
61.
Wellman, B., and B. Leighton.1979. Networks, neighborhoods and communities: Approach to the study of the community question. Urban Affairs Quarterly14:363-90.
62.
Wirth, L.1938. Le phénomène urbain comme mode de vie. In L’École de Chicago. Naissance de l’écologie urbaine, eds. Y. Grafmeye and I. Joseph, 251-77. Paris: Champ urbain.
63.
Young, M.D., and P. Willmott.1957. Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan.
