We describe an interview-based data-collection procedure for social network analysis designed to aid gathering information about the people known by a respondent and reduce problems with data integrity and respondent burden. This procedure, a participant-aided network diagram (sociogram), is an extension of traditional name generators. Although such a diagram can be produced through computer-assisted programs for interviewing (CAPIs) and low technology (i.e., paper), we demonstrate both practical and methodological reasons for keeping high technology in the lab and low technology in the field. We provide some general heuristics that can reduce the time needed to complete a name generator. We present findings from our Connected Lives field study to illustrate this procedure and compare to an alternative method for gathering network data.
Abbott, A.2001. Transcending linear reality. In T ime matters: On theory and method, ed. A. Abbott, 37—63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Adar, E.2006. GUESS: A language and interface for graph exploration . Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 06). Montreal, April 22—27. See http://www.interaction-design.org/references/conferences/series/chi.html .
3.
Antonucci, T.1986. Measuring social support networks: Hierarchical mapping technique. Generations10:10—12.
4.
Batchelder, E.2002. Comparing three simultaneous measurements of a sociocognitive network. Social Networks24 (3): 261—77.
5.
Bernard, H.R., P.D. Killworth, and L. Sailer.1979. Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Social Networks2 (3): 191—218.
6.
Boase, J., J. Horrigan, B. Wellman, and L. Rainie.2006. Pew report: The strength of Internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
7.
Boissevain, J.1974. Friends of friends. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
8.
Boster, J.1994. The successive pile sort. Cultural Anthropology Methods Journal6 (2): 11—12.
9.
Burt, R.1984. Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks6 (4): 293—339.
10.
Carrasco, J.-A.2006. Social activity-travel behaviour: A personal networks approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto.
11.
Carrasco, J.-A., B. Hogan, B. Wellman, and E. Miller.Forthcoming. Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: An egocentered approach. Environment and Planning B. See http://www.envplan.com/.
12.
Costenbader, E., and T.W. Valente.2003. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks25 (4): 283—307.
13.
de Sola Pool, I., and M. Kochen.1978. Contacts and influence. Social Networks1 (1): 1—48.
14.
Erickson, B.H.1996. Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology102 (1): 217—51.
15.
Espinoza, V.1999. Social networks among the urban poor: Inequality and integration in a Latin American city. In Networks in the global village , ed. B. Wellman, 147—84. Boulder, CO: Westview.
16.
Faust, K., and S. Wasserman.1992. Blockmodels: Interpretation and evaluation . Social Networks14 (1—2): 5—61.
17.
Ferrand, A., L. Mounier, and A. Degenne.1999. The diversity of personal networks in France: Social stratification and relational structures. In Networks in the global village, ed. B. Wellman , 185—224. Boulder, CO: Westview .
18.
Fischer, C.1982. To dwell among friends. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
19.
Fischer, C., R.M. Jackson, C.A. Steuve, K. Gerson, L.M. Jones, and M. Baldassare.1977. Networks and places. New York: Free Press.
20.
Fitzgerald, M.1978. The content and structure of friendship: An analysis of the friendships of urban Cameroonians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.
21.
Flap, H.D., T.A.B. Snijders, B. Volker, and M.P.J. Van Der Gaag .1999. Measurement instruments for social capital of individuals. Available at http://www.xs4all.nl/.SSND.pdf .
22.
Freeman, L.C.2000. Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure 1 (1). Available at http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Freeman.html .
23.
———. 2004. The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, BC: Empirical.
24.
Freeman, L.C., A.K. Romney, and S.C. Freeman.1987. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy . American Anthropologist89 (2): 310—25.
25.
Granovetter, M.1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78 (6): 1360—80.
26.
———. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited . Sociological Theory1 (1): 201—33.
27.
Krackhardt, D.1987. Cognitive social structures. Social Networks9 (2): 109—34.
28.
Laumann, E.O.1973. Bonds of pluralism: The forms and substance of urban social networks. New York: John Wiley.
29.
Lin, N., Y.-C. Fu, and R.-M. Hsung.2001. The position generator: Measurement techniques or investigations of social capital. In Social capital: Theory and research, ed. N. Lin, K. Cook, and R. S. Burt, 57—81. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
30.
Manfreda, K.L., V. Vehovar, and V. Hlebec.2004. Collecting ego-centered network data via the Web. Metodološki Zvezki1 (2): 295—321.
31.
Marin, A.2004. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks26 (4): 289—307.
32.
Marsden, P.V.1987. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review52 (1): 122—31.
33.
McCarty, C., and S. Govindaramanujam .2005. A modified elicitation of personal networks using dynamic visualization. Connections26 (2): 61—69.
34.
McCarty, C., P.D. Killworth, H.R. Bernard, E.C. Johnsen, and G.A. Shelley.2000. Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organization60 (1): 28—39.
35.
McCarty, C., and A. Wutich.2005. Conceptual and empirical arguments for including or excluding ego from structural analyses of personal networks . Connections26 (2): 80—86.
36.
McPherson, J.M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M. Brashears.2006. Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review71 (3): 353—75.
37.
Moreno, J.1934. Who shall survive?Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company .
38.
Northway, M.L.1952. A primer of sociometry. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
39.
Pahl, R., and L. Spencer.2004. Capturing personal communities. In Social networks and social exclusion, ed. C. Phillipson, G. Allan, and D. Morgan, 72—96. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
40.
Piccalo, G.2006. The significance of others. Los Angeles Times, July 23, E1. Available online at http://tinyurl.com/ykte8o .
41.
Romney, A.K., and K. Faust.1982. Predicting the structure of a communications network from recalled data. Social Networks4 (4): 285—304.
42.
Shulman, N.1972. Urban social networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Department of Sociology, University of Toronto.
43.
Spencer, L., and R. Pahl.2006. Rethinking friendship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Statistics Canada.2004. East York Ontario (Borough/Dissolved). Community Profiles. Available at http://tinyurl.com/yddux7.
45.
Van Der Gaag, M.P.J., and T.A.B. Snijders .2005. The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks27 (1): 1—29.
46.
Wellman, B.1979. The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology84 (5): 1201—33.
47.
———. 1982. Studying personal communities. In Social structure and network analysis, ed. P. Marsden and N. Lin, 61—80. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
———. 1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Social structures: A network approach , ed. B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz, 19—61. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
———. 1993. An egocentric network tale: Comment on Bien et al. 1991 . Social Networks15 (4): 423—36.
50.
Wellman, B., and B. Hogan, with K. Berg, J. Boase, J.A. Carrasco, R. Côté, J. Kayahara, Y.L.M. Kennedy, and P. Tran.2006. Connected lives: The project. In Networked neighbourhoods, ed. P. Purcell, 161—216. London: Springer .
51.
Wellman, B., and S. Wortley.1989. Brothers' keepers: Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives32 (3): 273—306.
52.
———. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology96 (3): 558—88.
