Using randomly ordered name generators, we tested the effect of name generators’ relative position on the likelihood of respondents’ declining to respond or satisficing in their response. An online survey of public health staff elicited names of information sources, information seekers, perceived experts, and friends. Results show that when name generators are asked later, they are more likely to go unanswered and respondents are more likely to respond that they do not know anyone or list fewer names. The effect of sequence was not consistent in different question types, which could be the result of the moderating effect of willingness to answer and question sensitivity.
BaileyS.MarsdenP.. 1999. “Interpretation and Interview Context: Examining the General Social Survey Name Generator Using Cognitive Methods.” Social Networks21:287–309.
2.
BearmanP.ParigiP.. 2004. “Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topics and Network Structure.” Social Forces83:535–57.
3.
BorgattiS.MolinaJ.. 2003. “Ethical and Strategic Issues in Organizational Social Network Analysis.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science39:337–49.
4.
BrashearsM.2011. “Small Networks and High Isolation? A Reexamination of American Discussion Networks.” Social Networks33:331–41.
5.
BrashearsM.QuintaneE.. 2015. “The Microstructures of Network Recall: How Social Networks are Encoded and Represented in Human Memory.” Social Networks41:113–26. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.11.003.
6.
BrewerD. D.1995. “The Social Structural Basis of the Organization of Persons in Memory.” Human Nature6:379–403.
7.
BrewerD. D.2000. “Forgetting in the Recall-based Elicitation of Personal and Social Networks.” Social Networks22:29–43.
8.
BrewerD. D.RinaldiG.MogoutovA.ValenteT. W.. 2005. “A Quantitative Review of Associative Patterns in the Recall of Persons.” Journal of Social Structure6. Retrieved (http://aris.ss.uci.edu/~lin/data/2005Brewer_3_6_11_.pdf).
9.
BurtR.1983. “Distinguishing Relational Contents.” Pp. 35–74 in Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, edited by BurtR.MinorM.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
BurtR.1984. “Network Items and the General Social Survey.” Social Networks6:293–339.
11.
BurtR.1986. “A Note on Sociometric Order in the General Social Survey Network Data.” Social Networks8:149–89.
12.
CampbellK.LeeB.. 1991. “Name Generators in Surveys of Personal Networks.” Social Networks13:203–21.
13.
CostenbaderE.ValenteT.. 2003. “The Stability of Centrality Measures When Networks Are Sampled.” Social Networks25:283–307.
14.
DeutskensE.. 2004. “Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-based Surveys: An Experimental Study.” Marketing Letters15:21–36.
15.
FischerC.1982. “What Do We Mean by “Friend”? An Inductive Study.” Social Networks3:287–306.
16.
FischerC.2009. “The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact?” American Sociological Review74:657–69.
GalesicM.2006. “Dropouts on the Web: Effects of Interest and Burden Experienced During An Online Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics22:313–28.
19.
HeberleinT.BaumgartnerR.. 1978. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature.” American Sociological Review43:447–62.
20.
KillworthP. D.JohnsenE. C.BernardH. R.ShelleyG. A.McCartyC.. 1990. “Estimating the Size of Personal Networks.” Social Networks12:289–312.
21.
KnappF.HeidingsfelderM.. 2001. “Drop-out Analysis: Effects of the Survey Design.” Pp. 221–30 in Dimensions of Internet Science, edited by ReipsU.-D.BosnjakM.. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
22.
KossinetsG.2006. “Effects of Missing Data in Social Networks.” Social Networks28:247–68.
23.
KrosnickJ.1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology5:213–36.
24.
KrosnickJ.2000. “The Threat of Satisficing in Surveys: The Shortcuts Respondents Take in Answering Questions.” Survey Methods Newsletter20:4–8.
25.
LaumannE.MarsdenP.PrenskyD.. 1983. “The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis.” Pp. 18–34 in Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, edited by BurtR.MinorM.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
ManfredaK.VehovarV.HlebecV.. 2004. “Collecting Ego-centred Network Data via the Web.” Metodološki zvezki1:295–321.
27.
MarinA.2004. “Are Respondents More Likely to List Alters with Certain Characteristics? Implications for Name Generator Data.” Social Networks26:289–307.
28.
MarinA.HamptonK. N.. 2007. “Simplifying the Personal Network Name Generator: Alternatives to Traditional Multiple and Single Name Generators.” Field Methods19:163–93.
29.
MarsdenP.1993. “The Reliability of Network Density and Composition Measures.” Social Networks15:399–401.
30.
MarsdenP.2011. “Survey Methods for Network Data.” Pp. 370–88 in The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by ScottJ.. Sage.
31.
MatzatU.SnijdersC.. 2010. “Does the Online Collection of Ego-centered Network Data Reduce Data Quality? An Experimental Comparison.” Social Networks32:105–11.
32.
Mazurek MelnykB.Fineout-OverholtE.MaysM.. 2008. “The Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation Scales: Psychometric Properties of Two New Instruments.” Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing5:208–16.
33.
McCartyC.KillworthP.RennellJ.. 2007. “Impact of Methods for Reducing Respondent Burden on Personal Network Structural Measures.” Social Networks29:300–15.
34.
MccollE.EcclesM. P.RousseauN. S.SteenI. N.ParkinD. W.GrimshawJ. M.. 2003. “From the Generic to the Condition-Specific? Instrument Order Effects in Quality of Life Assessment.” Medical Care41:777–90.
35.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM.. 2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review71:353–75.
36.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM.. 2008. “ERRATA: Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review73:1022.
37.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM.. 2009. “Models and Marginals: Using Survey Evidence to Study Social Networks.” American Sociological Review74:670–81.
38.
PaikA.SanchagrinK.. 2013. “Social Isolation in America: An Artifact.” American Sociological Review78:339–60.
39.
PustejovskyJ.SpillaneJ.. 2009. “Question-order Effects in Social Network Name Generators.” Social Networks31:221–29.
40.
SchwarzN.1999. “Self-reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers.” American Psychologist54:93–105.
41.
SchwarzN.StrackF.HipplerH. J.BishopG.. 1991. “The Impact of Administrative Mode on Response Effects in Survey Measurement.” Applied Cognitive Psychology5:193–212.
42.
ShoemakerP.EichholzM.SkewesE.. 2002. “Item Nonresponse: Distinguishing between Don’t Know and Refuse.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research14:193–201.
43.
StataCorp. 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
44.
TourangeauR.1984. “Cognitive Science and Survey Methods.” Pp. 73–100 in Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge between Disciplines, edited by JabineT.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45.
TourangeauR.BradburnN.. 2010. “The Psychology of Survey Response.” Pp. 315–46 in Handbook of Survey Research, edited by MarsdenP.WrightJ.. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
TourangeauR.SmithT.. 1996. “Asking Sensitive Questions the Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context.” Public Opinion Quarterly60:275–304.
48.
Van der PoelM.1993. “Delineating Personal Support Networks.” Social Networks15:49–70.
49.
VehovarV.ManfredaK. L.KorenG.HlebecV.. 2008. “Measuring Ego-centered Social Networks on the Web: Questionnaire Design Issues.” Social Networks30:213–22.
50.
VerderyA. M.MerliM. G.MoodyJ.SmithJ.FisherJ. C.. 2015. “Respondent-driven Sampling Estimators under Real and Theoretical Recruitment Conditions of Female Sex Workers in China.” Epidemiology26:661–65.
51.
YammarinoF.SkinnerS.ChildersT.. 1991. “Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly55:613–39.
52.
Yousefi-NooraieR.DobbinsM.BrouwersM.WakefieldP.. 2012. “Information Seeking for Making Evidence-Informed Decisions: A Social Network Analysis on the Staff of a Public Health Department in Canada”. Bmc Health Services Research, 12:118.
53.
Yousefi-NooraieR.DobbinsM.MarinA.HannemanR.LohfeldL.. 2015. “The Evolution of Social Networks Through the Implementation of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Interventions: A Longitudinal Analysis of Three Public Health Units in Canada”. Implementation Science, 10:166.
54.
Yousefi-NooraieR.MarinA.HannemanR.LohfeldL.DobbinsM.. 2017. “Implementation of Evidence-Informed Practice Through Central Network Actors; A Case Study of Three Public Health Units in Canada”. BMC Health Services Research, 17:208.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
