Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-5
Applying Three Strategies for Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Databases in a Mixed Methods Study of a Nontraditional Graduate Education Program
A central issue for mixed methods research is for researchers to effectively integrate (or mix) the quantitative and qualitative data in their studies. Despite extensive methodological discussions about integration, researchers using mixed methods approaches struggle with translating these discussions into practice and often make inadequate use of integration in their studies. The authors examined their integration practices as they applied three literature-based strategies within the context of one mixed methods study about a nontraditional graduate education program. From this examination, the authors describe the processes, products, uses, and challenges that materialized as they merged their quantitative and qualitative databases to develop a better understanding of participants’ perceptions of their experience in the program.
Bryman, A.2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research6 (1): 97-113.
2.
Bryman, A.2007. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research . Journal of Mixed Methods Research1 (1): 8-22.
3.
Buck, G.A., D.L. Leslie-Pelecky, Y. Lu, V. L. Plano Clark, and J.W. Creswell.2006. Self-definition of woman experiencing a nontraditional graduate fellowship program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching43 (8): 852-73.
4.
Caracelli, V.J., and J.C. Greene.1993. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis15 (2): 195-207.
5.
Creswell, J.W., and V. L. Plano Clark.2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
Creswell, J.W., V. L. Plano Clark, and A. Garrett.2008. Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. In Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications, ed. M. M. Bergman, 66-83. London: SAGE.
7.
Creswell, J.W., V. L. Plano Clark, M. Gutmann, and W. Hanson.2003. Advanced mixed methods research designs . In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research , ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 209-40. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
Fetters, M.D., T. Yoshioka, G.M. Greenberg, D.W. Gorenflo, and S. Yeo.2007. Advance consent in Japanese during prenatal care for epidural anesthesia during childbirth. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1 (4): 333-65.
9.
Greene, J.C.2007. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Greene, J.C.2008. Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology ? Journal of Mixed Methods Research2 (1): 7-22.
11.
Greene, J. C., and V. J. Caracelli, eds. 1997. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New directions for evaluation, No. 74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Greene, J.C., V.J. Caracelli, and W.F. Graham.1989. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis11 (3): 255-74.
13.
Hanson, W.E., J.W. Creswell, V. L. Plano Clark, K.S. Petska, and J.D. Creswell.2005. Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology52 (2): 224-35.
14.
Idler, E.L., S.V. Hudson, and H. Leventhal.1999. The meanings of self-ratings of health: A qualitative and quantitative approach. Research on Aging21 (3): 458-76.
15.
Lee, Y., and J.C. Greene.2007. The predictive validity of an ESL placement test: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1 (4): 366-89.
16.
McAuley, C., N. McCurry, M. Knapp, J. Beecham, and M. Sleed.2006. Young families under stress: Assessing maternal and child well-being using a mixed-methods approach. Child and Family Social Work11 (1): 43-54.
17.
Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman.1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
Mizrahi, T., and B.B. Rosenthal.2001. Complexities of coalition building: Leaders’ successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions. Social Work46 (1): 63-78.
Morse, J.M.2006. The politics of developing research methods. Qualitative Health Research16 (1): 3-4.
21.
O’Cathain, A., E. Murphy, and J. Nicholl.2007. Integration and publications as indicators of "yield" from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1 (2): 147-63.
22.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., and C. Teddlie.2003. A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 351-83. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
Pagano, M.E., B.J. Hirsch, N.L. Deutsch, and D.P. McAdams.2002. The transmission of values to school-age and young adult offspring: Race and gender differences in parenting. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy14 (3/4): 13-36.
24.
Plano Clark, V.L.2005. Cross-disciplinary analysis of the use of mixed methods in physics education research, counseling psychology, and primary care. PhD diss., University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Dissertation Abstracts International66:02A.
25.
Plano Clark, V.L., C.A. Huddleston-Casas, S.L. Churchill, D.O. Green, and A.L. Garrett.2008. Mixed methods approaches in family science research. Journal of Family Issues29 (11): 1543-66.
26.
Sale, J.E., L.H. Lohfeld, and K. Brazil.2002. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity36 (1): 43-53.
27.
Tashakkori, A., and J.W. Creswell.2007. The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1 (1): 3-7.
28.
Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie.1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori.2006. A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools13 (1): 12-28.
30.
Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori.2009. Foundations of mixed methods research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
Vitale, D.C., A.A. Armenakis, and H.S. Field.2008. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods for organizational diagnosis: Possible priming effects? Journal of Mixed Methods Research2 (1): 87-105.
32.
Wittink, M.N., F.K. Barg, and J.J. Gallo.2006. Unwritten rules of talking to doctors about depression: Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. Annals of Family Medicine4 (4): 302-9.
33.
Yount, K.M., and J. Gittelsohn.2008. Comparing reports of health-seeking behavior from the integrated illness history and a standard child morbidity survey. Journal of Mixed Methods Research2 (1): 23-62.
