This article clarifies the role of triangulation in mixed methods research designs. Triangulation is used to describe “severe” statistical tests of correlation between alternative quantitative measurements and is employed to test the accuracy of those measurements. In contrast, the broader concept of mixed methods describes the integration of diverse qualitative and quantitative approaches and is employed to build theory. The concepts are developed and demonstrated in relation to a complex field study that evaluated an Israel experience educational program.
Bond, T.G., and M. Fox.2001. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Creswell, J.W., V.L. Plano Clark, M.L. Gutmann, and W.E. Hanson.2003. Advanced mixed methods research designs . In Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research , edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 209—40. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Goldberg, H., S. Heilman, and B. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett .2002. The Israel experience: Studies in youth travel and Jewish identity. Jerusalem, Israel: Studio Kavgraph, Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies .
4.
Goldwater, C.2002. Constructing the narrative of authenticity: Tour educators at work in the Israel experience. Master's thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
5.
Hanson, W.E., J.W. Creswell, V.L. Plano Clark, K.S. Petska, and J.D. Creswell.2005. Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology52 (2): 224—35.
6.
Henry, N.W., and P.F. Lazarsfeld .1968. Latent structure analysis . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Ivankova, N.V., J.W. Creswell, and S.L. Stick.2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods18 (1): 3—20.
8.
Johnson, R.B., and A.J. Onwegbuzie .2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research33 (7): 14—26.
9.
Kelner, S.2002. Almost pilgrims: Authenticity, identity and the extra-ordinary on a Jewish tour of Israel. PhD diss., Department of Sociology , City University of New York.
10.
Miller, S.I., and J.L. Gatta.2006. The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity40 (4): 595—610.
11.
Perneger, T.V.1998. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments?The British Medical Journal316 (7139): 1236—38.
12.
Sale, J.E.M., L.H. Lohfeld, and K. Brazil.2002. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity36:43—53.
13.
Saxe, L., C. Kadushin, S. Kelner, M.I. Rosen, and E. Yereslove.2002. A mega-experiment in Jewish education: The impact of birthright israel. Waltham, MA: Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, Brandeis University.
14.
Saxe, L., C. Kadushin, H. Shahar, and M.I. Rosen.2004. birthright israel: Recent findings and long-term effects. Waltham, MA: Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, Brandeis University.
15.
Saxe, L., T. Sasson, and S. Hecht.2006. Taglit-birthright israel: Impact on Jewish identity, peoplehood, and connection to Israel. Waltham, MA: Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, Brandeis University.
16.
Sieber, S.D.1973. The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology78 (6): 1335—59.
17.
Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie.2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
