A concern exists that mixed methods studies do not contain advocacy stances. Preliminary evidence suggests that this is not the case, but to address this issue in more depth the authors examined 13 mixed methods studies that contained an advocacy, transformative lens. Such a lens consisted of incorporating intent to advocate for an improvement in human interests and society through addressing issues of power and social relationships. Included for review were 10 criteria for a transformative study and rigorous procedures for mixed methods research. The findings of this study suggested that several transformative criteria are being used in published mixed methods studies but that some are underutilized. This analysis helped advance eight key elements that authors might use for incorporating a transformative lens into a mixed methods study.
Bhopal, K. ( 2000). Gender, "race" and power in the research process: South Asian women in east London. In C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, & B. Humpries (Eds.), Research and inequality (pp. 67-79). London : UCL.
2.
*Boland, M., Daly, L., & Staines, A. ( 2008). Methodological issues in inclusive intellectual disability research: A health promotion needs assessment of people attending Irish Disability Services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities , 21, 199-209.
3.
Bryman, A. ( 2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.
4.
Buck, G., Cook, K., Quigley, C., Eastwood, J., & Lucas, Y. (2009). Profiles of urban, low SES, African-American girls’ attitudes toward science: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 386-410.
5.
*Cartwright, E., Schow, D., & Herrera, S. ( 2006). Using participatory research to build an effective type 2 diabetes intervention: The process of advocacy among female Hispanic farmworkers and their families in southeast Idaho. Women & Health , 43(4), 89-109.
6.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. ( 2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. ( 2002). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field . St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
10.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Ely, R.J. ( 1995). The power in demography: Women’s social construction of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal , 38, 589-634.
12.
*Ferree, M.M. ( 2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 304-344.
13.
*Filipas, H.H., & Ullman S.E. ( 2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, 16, 673-692.
14.
Fisher, D.G., & Needle, R. ( 1993). AIDS and community-based drug intervention programs: Evaluation and outreach. Gloucestershire, UK: Hawthorne Press.
15.
*Freeman, M.L. ( 2000). Incorporating gender issues in practice with the Satir growth model. Families in Society, 81, 256-268.
16.
Hawkins, A.J., Roberts, T.A., & Christiansen, S.L. (1994). An evaluation of a program to help dual-earner couples share the second shift. Family Relations, 43, 213-220.
17.
*Hill, M., Dillane, J., Bannister, J., & Scott, S. ( 2002). Everybody needs good neighbours: An evaluation of an intensive project for families facing eviction. Child & Family Social Work, 7, 79-89.
18.
*Hodgkin, S. ( 2008). Telling it all: A story of women’s social capital using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 2, 296-316.
19.
*Hollingsworth, L.D. ( 2004). Child custody loss among women with persistent severe mental illness. Social Work Research, 28, 199-209.
20.
Howe, K.R. ( 2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
21.
*Kumar, M.S., Mudaliar, S.M., Thyagarajan, S.P., Kumar, S., Selvanayagam, A., & Daniels, D. ( 2000). Rapid assessment and response to injecting drug use in Madras, south India. International Journal of Drug Policy , 11, 83-98.
22.
Leckenby, D., & Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2007). Feminist approaches to mixed-methods research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 249-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mertens, D.M. ( 1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1-14.
25.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice . Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 212-225.
27.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford.
28.
*Newman, K., & Wyly, E.K. ( 2006). The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies , 43(1), 23-57.
29.
*Nordenmark, M., & Nyman, C. ( 2003). Fair or unfair? Perceived fairness of household division of labour and gender equality among women and men: The Swedish case. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 10, 181-209.
30.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. ( 2003). Islamic culture and democracy: Testing the "clash of civilizations" thesis. In R. Inglehart (Ed.), Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys (pp. 5-34). Leiden t: E. J. Brill.
31.
Rhodes, T., & Hartnoll, R. ( 1996). AIDS, drugs and prevention: Perspectives on individual and community action. London: Routledge .
32.
Riddell, T., Ford-Gilboe, M., & Leipert, B. ( 2009). Strategies used by rural women to stop, avoid or prevent intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International , 30, 1-25.
33.
*Shapiro, M., Setterlund, D., & Cragg, C. ( 2003). Capturing the complexity of women’s experiences: A mixed-method approach to studying incontinence in older women. Affilia, 18, 21-33.
34.
Singer, M., Stopka, T., Shaw, S., Santelices, C., Buchanan, D., Teng, W., et al. (2005). Lessons from the field: From research to application in the fight against AIDS among injection drug users in three New England cities. Human Organization, 64(2), 115-127.
35.
Stewart, A.J., & Cole, E.R. ( 2007). Narratives and numbers: Feminist multiple methods research . In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 327-344). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Sweetman, D. ( 2008). Use of the transformative-emancipatory perspective in mixed methods studies: A review and recommendations. Unpublished manuscript.
37.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. ( 2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
*Tolman, D.L., & Szalacha, L.A. (1999). Dimensions of desire: Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 7-39.
39.
Watkins, G.H. ( 1998, November 5-8). Satisfaction and mentoring: An African American perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 427 596)
