As sign language is the primary communication channel for the vast majority of deaf persons, options for survey research with this population are limited. A video computerassisted self-administered interview (CASI) instrument developed for deaf respondents is introduced. With the help of a case study involving 234 deaf persons in Austria, the impact of multimedia-supported CASI methods for special populations is discussed.
Angermeyer, M. C., R. Kilian, and H. Matschinger. 2000. WHOQOL—100 und WHOQOL— BREF. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Version der WHO instrumente zur erfassung der lebensqualität. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
2.
Black, M. M., and A. Ponirakis. 2000. Computer administered interventions with children about maltreatment: Methodological, developmental, and ethical issues. Journal of Interpersonal Violence15 (7): 682–695.
3.
Couper, M. P.2000. Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments. Social Science Computer Review18 (4): 384–396.
4.
Couper, M. P., and W. L. Nicholls. 1998. The history and development of computer assisted survey information collection methods. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, ed. M. P. Couper, R. P., Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls, and J. M. O'Reilly, 1–21. New York: John Wiley.
5.
de Leeuw, E.2002. The effect of computer-assisted interviewing on data quality: A review of the evidence. In Social science methodology in the new millennium, ed. J. Blasius, J. Hox, J., E. de Leeuw, and P. Schmidt. CD-ROM. Opladen, Germany: Leske Budrich.
6.
de Leeuw, E., J. Hox, and S. Kef. 2003. Computer-assisted self-interviewing tailored for special populations and topics. Field Methods15 (3): 223–510.
7.
de Leeuw, E., J. Hox, S. Kef, and M. Van Hattum. 1997. Overcoming the problems of special interviews on sensitive topics: Computer assisted self-interviewing tailored for young children and adolescents. Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, Sequim, Washington.
8.
de Leeuw, E., J. Hox, and G. Snijkers. 1995. The effect of computer-assisted interviewing on data quality: A review. Journal of the Market Research Society37 (4): 325–344.
9.
Derogatis, L. R., and P. M. Spencer. 1982. Brief symptom inventory: Administration, scoring and procedures manual I. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Dillman, D. A.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
11.
Dillman, D. A., and L. M. Christian. 2005. Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods17 (1): 30–52.
12.
Dotter, F.1996. Computer for the deaf (and hearing impaired): Towards an integrated solution from a linguistic standpoint. In Interdisciplinary aspects on computers helping people with special needs, ed. J. Klaus, E. Auff, W. Kremser, and L. Z. Zagler, 205–210. Linz, Austria: Austrian Computer Society Book Series.
13.
Fellinger, J., D. Holzinger, U. Dobner, J. Gerich, R. Lehner, G. Lenz, and D. P. Goldberg. 2005a. An innovative and reliable way of measuring health-related quality of life and mental distress in the deaf community. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology40 (3): 245–250.
14.
Fellinger, J., D. Holzinger, U. Dobner, J. Gerich, R. Lehner, G. Lenz, and D. P. Goldberg. 2005b. Mental distress and quality of life in a deaf population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology40 (9): 737–742.
15.
Franke, H. G.2000. BSI—Brief symptom inventory von L. R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R)–Deutsche Version. Manual. Göttingen, Germany: Beltz Test GmbH.
16.
Gelter, I.1987. Wortschatz und Lesefähigkeit gehörloser Schüler. Der Sprachheilpädagoge3:37–42.
17.
Goldberg, D. P.1978. Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER Publishing.
18.
Goldberg, D. P.2000. General health questionnaire. In A handbook of psychiatric measures/task force for the handbook of psychiatric measures, ed. J. Rush Jr., ed., 72–78. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
19.
Harkness, J. A., and A. Schoua-Glusberg. 1998. Questionnaires in translation. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial3:87–126.
20.
Johnston, J., and C. Walton. 1995. Reducing response effects for sensitive questions: A computer assisted self interview with audio. Social Science Computer Review13 (3): 304–319.
21.
Lessler, J. T., and J. M. O'Reilly. 1997. Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: Design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing. NIDA Research Monograph167:366–382.
22.
Lucas, C., ed. 1996. Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in deaf communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
23.
Mead, A. D., and F. Drasgow. 1993. Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin114 (3): 449–458.
24.
Nicholls, W. L. II, R. P. Baker, and J. Martin. 1997. The effect of new data collection technologies on survey data quality. In Survey measurement and process quality, ed. L. Lybert, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 221–248. New York: John Wiley.
25.
O'Reilly, J. M., M. L. Hubbard, J. T. Lessler, P. P. Biemer, and C. F. Turner. 1994. Audio and video computer-assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. Journal of Official Statistics10 (2): 197–214.
26.
Parsons, J. A., S. Baum, and T. P. Johnson. 2000. Inclusion of disabled populations in social surveys: Review and recommendations. Paper prepared by the Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago.
27.
Piazza, T., and P. M. Sniderman. 1998. Incorporating experiments into computer assisted surveys. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, ed. M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls, and J. M. O'Reilly, 167–184. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Presser, S., M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, J. M. Rothgeb, and E. Singer. 2004. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly68 (1): 109–130.
29.
Ramos, M., B. M. Sedivi, and E. M. Sweet. 1998. Computerized self-administered questionnaires. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, ed. M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls, and J. M. O'Reilly, 389–408. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Redline, C. D., and D. A. Dillman. 1999. The influence of auxiliary, symbolic, numeric, and verbal languages on navigational compliance in self-administered questionnaires. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Nonresponse, Portland, Oregon.
31.
Richman, W. L., S. Weisband, S. Kiesler, and F. Drasgow. 1999. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology84 (5): 754–775.
32.
Sawaki, Y.2001. Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in a second language. Language Learning Technology5 (2): 38–59.
33.
Schneider, S. J., and B. Edwards. 2000. Developing usability guidelines for audiocasi respondents with limited literacy skills. Journal of Official Statistics16 (3): 255–271.
34.
Sikkel, D.1998. The individual interview. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, ed. M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls, and J. M. O'Reilly, 147–165. New York: John Wiley.
35.
Sproull, L., M. Subramani, S. Kiesler, J. H. Walker, and K. Waters. 1996. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction11 (2): 97–124.
36.
Sudman, S., and N. M. Bradburn. 1974. Response effects in surveys. Chicago: Aldine.
37.
Tourangeau, R., and T. W. Smith. 1996. Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly60 (2): 275–304.
38.
Turner, C. F., L. Ku, S. M. Rogers, L. D. Lindberg, J. H. Pleck, and F. L. Sonenstein. 1998. Adolescent sexual behaviour, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science280 (5365): 867–873.
39.
Van Hattum, M. J. C., and E. de Leeuw. 1999. A disk by mail survey of pupils in primary schools: Data quality and logistics. Journal of Official Statistics15 (3): 413–429.
40.
Wainer, H.1990. Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Weisband, S., and S. Kiesler. 1996. Self-disclosure on computer forms: meta-analysis and implications [online]. Paper presented at the conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada. http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Weisband/sw_txt.htm.
42.
WHOQOL Group. 1998. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine28 (3): 551–558.
