To collect reliable statistical data on domestic violence in Curaçao, we conducted a large-scale quantitative study (n = 816). To meet with the special needs of the population and topic, we designed a tailored mixed-mode survey to assess the prevalence of domestic violence in Curaçao and its health consequences. Great care was taken to reduce selective nonresponse and stimulate open and honest responses. We describe how we implemented and tailored a mixed-mode survey and report on its consequences for response and data quality.
AiC.NortonE. C.. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters80:123–29.
2.
BarnishM.2004. Domestic violence: A literature review. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation.
3.
BergmanM. M., ed. 2008. Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. London: Sage.
4.
BlythB.2008. Mixed-mode: The only “fitness” regime?International Journal of Market Research50:241–66.
5.
BoerS.2004. Censusatlas 2001 Curaçao, Nederlandse Antillen [In Dutch: Atlas of the Census 2001, Curaçao, Dutch Antilles]. Willemstad, Curaçao: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
6.
BosC.Van ZandenN.. 2004. Huiselijk geweld in Drenthe [In Dutch: Domestic violence in the Dutch province Drente]. Assen, the Netherlands: GGD Drenthe.
7.
ChinV.DandurandY.ObandoA. E.. 2001. Violence in the Americas: A regional analysis including a review of the implementation of the Inter-American convention for the prevention, punishment and eradication of violence against women. National program to prevent, punish and eradicate violence against women in ten Caribbean countries. Washington, DC: CIM/OAS.
8.
ColinD.2010. Latin America and the Caribbean selected economic and social data. Washington, DC: USAID, Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean.
9.
CouttsE.JannB.. 2011Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT). Sociological Methods & Research40:169–93.
10.
De LeeuwE. D.1992. Empirical evidence of mode effects: A meta-analysis. In Data quality in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys, ed. de LeeuwE. D., 21–34. Amsterdam: TT-publikaties. http://edithl.home.xs4all.nl/pubs/disseddl.pdf(accessed March 21, 2013).
11.
De LeeuwE. D.2005. To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics21:233–55.
12.
De LeeuwE. D.2008. Choosing the method of data collection. In International handbook of survey methodology, eds. de LeeuwE. D.HoxJ. J.DillmanDon A., 113–35. New York: LEA, Taylor and Francis group.
13.
DiamondS. S.1994. Reference guide on survey research. In Reference manual on scientific evidence, pp. 221–71. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
14.
DillmanD. A.2007. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. Rev. ed. New York: John Wiley.
15.
DillmanD. A.ChristianL. M.. 2005. Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods17:30–52.
16.
GGD Amsterdam. 2008. De Amsterdamse Gezondheidsmonitor [In Dutch: The Amsterdam health monitor]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Geneeskundige-en Gezondheids Dienst Amsterdam, GGD.
17.
Global Movement for Children (GMfC), Latin America & Caribbean Division, Workgroup on Violence. 2009. Mapping the Caribbean for follow up to the UN SG’s Study on Violence Against Against Children. SMC Research Foundation, Aruba.
18.
GoderieM.Ter WoerdsS.. 2005. Meten van geweld achter de voordeur [In Dutch: Measuring domestic violence in the household]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Verwey-Jonker Instituut. http://www.verwey-jonker.nl/doc/vitaliteit/D5352368_totaal.pdf(accessed March 26, 2013).
19.
GreeneJ. C.2007. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
JehnK.JonsenK.. 2010. A multimethod approach to the study of sensitive organizational issues. Journal of Mixed Methods Research4:313–41.
21.
LeeR. M.1993. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
22.
LesslerJ. T.O’ReillyJ. M.. 1997. Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: Design and implementation of audio computer assisted self-interviewing. In The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates, eds. HarrisonL.HughesA., 366–81. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
23.
LinkM. W.MokdadA. H.. 2005. Effects of survey mode on self reports of adult alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol66:239–45.
24.
LünnemanK. D.BruinsmaM. Y.. 2005. Geweld binnen en buiten. Aard, omvang en daders van huiselijk geweld in Nederland [In Dutch: Violence: Types, magnitude, and perpetrators of domestic violence]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers. https://www.wodc.nl/images/ob231_volledige_tekst_tcm44-59057.pdf(accessed March 12, 2013).
25.
MacNeilM.2004. Preventing domestic abuse in the Western isles: The community perspective. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Executive.
26.
MoumT.1998. Mode of administration and interviewer effects in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Social Indicators Research45:279–318.
27.
PearlJ.2009. Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
RichmanW. L.KiesslerS.WeisbandS.DrasgowF.. 1999. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology84:754–75.
29.
SchaefferN. C.1999. Asking questions about sensitive topics: A selective overview. In The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice, eds. StoneA.BachrachC.JobeJ.KurtzmanH.CainV., 105–22. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B.. 1996. The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues17:283–316.
TourangeauR.SmithT. W.. 1996. Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly60:275–304.
33.
TourangeauR.YanT.. 2007. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin133:859–83.
34.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Bank. 2007. Crime, violence, and development: trends, costs, and policy options in the Caribbean. New York N.Y. Washington D.C: United Nations; World Bank.
35.
Van DijkT.FlightS.OppenhuisE.DuesmannB.. 1997. Huiselijk geweld: aard, omvang en hulpverlening[In Dutch: Domestic violence: Nature, magnitude, and social care]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Intomart. http://www.huiselijkgeweld.nl/feiten/landelijk/huiselijk_geweld(accessed March 21, 2013).
