The appropriate level of analysis for the study of culture has been contested. There is a tradition of conceptualizing culture apart from the individuals who interact within a society. Alternately, there is a tradition of seeing culture only in the minds of individuals in society. The authors’ contention is that there is no choice here; both perspectives are valid and can be integrated within a single framework. Borrowing the concept of integral aggregate variable from epidemiology, they argue that there are both integral aggregate properties of culture and integral individual properties of culture. Both dimensions of culture can be examined using cultural consensus analysis. With data on organizational culture, the authors show how an investigator can move from one level of analysis to another. These results illustrate how integral aggregate properties of culture can be extracted from individual data using consensus analysis and be used as measures of aggregate units of analysis.
Amabile, T. M.1997. Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review40:39–58.
2.
Batteau, A. W.2001. Negations and ambiguities in the cultures of organization. American Anthropologist102:726–740.
3.
Blalock, H. M.1979. Measurement and conceptualization problems: The major obstacle to integrating theory and research. American Sociological Review44:881–894.
4.
Bollen, K. A., and R. W. Jackman. 1985. Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Sociological Methods & Research13:510–542.
5.
Borgatti, S. P.1992. ANTHROPAC4.0 methods guide. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.
6.
Caulkins, D.1998. Consensus analysis: Do Scottish business advisers agree on models of success? In Usingmethods in the field: A practical introduction and casebook, edited by V. C. de Munck and E. J. Sobo, 179–196. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
7.
Caulkins, D., and S. Hyatt. 1999. Using consensus analysis to measure diversity in organizations and social movements. Field Methods11:5–26.
8.
Chatman, J. A., and K. A. Jehn. 1994. Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be?Academy of Management Journal37:522–554.
9.
Damanpour, F.1987. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management13:675–688.
10.
D’Andrade, R. G.1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Denison, D. R.1990. Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Dougherty, D.1996. Organizing for innovation. In Handbook of organizational studies, edited by S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. R. Nord, 424–439. London: Sage.
13.
Dressler, W. W.2001. Medical anthropology: Toward a third moment in social science?Medical Anthropology Quarterly15:455–465.
14.
Fine, G. A.1984. Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annual Review of Sociology10:239–262.
15.
Gatewood, J. C.2001. Reflections on the nature of cultural distributions and the units of culture problem. Cross-Cultural Research35:227–241.
16.
Geertz, C.1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Handwerker, W. P.1998. Consensus analysis. In Using methods in the field: A practical introduction and casebook, edited by V. C. de Munck and E. J. Sobo, 165–178. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
18.
Kaplan, A.1964. The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.
19.
Keesing, R.1974. Theories of culture. In Annual review of anthropology, vol. 3, edited by B. J. Siegel, A. R. Beals, and S. A. Tyler, 73–97. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
20.
Kimberly, J. R., and M. J. Evanisko. 1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal24:689–713.
21.
Kroeber, A. L.1917. The superorganic. American Anthropologist19:163–213.
22.
Martin, J.1992. Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Martin, J., and D. Meyerson. 1988. Organizational cultures and the denial, channeling, and acknowledgment of ambiguity. In Managing ambiguity and change, edited by R. P. Louis, R. Boland, and H. Thomas, 93–125. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Meyer, A. D., and J. B. Goes. 1988. Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal31:897–923.
25.
Morgan, G.1996. Images of organization. London: Sage.
26.
Nagel, E.1961. The structure of science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
27.
O’Reilly, C. J., J. Chatman, and D. Caldwell. 1991. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal34:487–516.
28.
Pelto, P. J., and G. H. Pelto. 1975. Intra-cultural diversity: Some theoretical issues. American Ethnologist10:1–18.
29.
Perri, Y.1993. Innovation by nonprofit organizations: Policy and research issues. Nonprofit Management and Leadership3:397–414.
30.
Pervaiz, K. A.1998. Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management1:30–47.
31.
Peters, T. J., and R. H. Waterman Jr.1982. In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s bestrun companies. New York: Warner.
32.
Roberts, G. B., K. Watson, and J. E. Oliver. 1989. Technological innovation and organizational culture: An exploratory comparison of larger and smaller firms. Journal of Organizational Change Management2:65–74.
33.
Robinson, W. S.1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review15:351–357.
34.
Romney, A. K., W. H. Batchelder, and S. C. Weller. 1987. Recent applications of consensus theory. American Behavioral Scientist31:163–177.
35.
Romney, A. K., S. C. Weller, and W. H. Batchelder. 1986. Cultures as consensus: A theory of cultural and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist88:313–338.
36.
Sapir, E.1917. Do we need a ‘superorganic’?American Anthropologist19:441–447.
37.
Schein, E. H.1994. Innovative cultures and organizations. In Information technology and the corporation of 1990s: Research studies, edited by T. J. Allen and M. S. Scott. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Schwartz, S.1994. The fallacy of the ecological fallacy. American Journal of Public Health84:819–824.
39.
Searle, J. R.1964. How to derive “ought” from “is.”Philosophical Review73:43–58.
40.
Sheridan, J. E.1992. Organizational culture and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal35:1036–1056.
41.
Spencer, H.1896. Principles of sociology. New York: D. Appleton.
42.
Trice, H. M.1993. Occupational subcultures in the workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
43.
Tylor, E. B.1973. Primitive culture. In Highpoints in anthropology, edited by P. Bohannon and M. Glazer, 63–78. New York: Knopf.
44.
Von Korff, M., T. Koepsell, S. Curry, and P. Diehr. 1992. Multi-level analysis in epidemiologic research on health behaviors and outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology135: 1077–1082.
