There is a paucity of descriptive research about written measures gleaned from writing samples that can be used to inform clinical practice. This exploratory study contributes data for writing measures obtained from informative paragraphs composed by fourth- and fifth-grade students with language-based learning disabilities (LLD). This study utilized a sample of convenience from a larger intervention study whereby assessments were obtained in the fall and spring of the same academic year. As part of the assessment battery, students composed two informative paragraphs using a scaffolded elicitation task across two informative writing prompts. Written transcription measures were compared between samples separately for each time point and correlations with oral language measures were evaluated. Findings indicated no significant differences in writing measures between prompts at either time point; however, correlations differed by prompt. These results contribute descriptive data about informative paragraph writing in a sample of students with LLD.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents [Knowledge and Skills]. www.asha.org/policy
2.
BeersS. F.NagyW. E. (2011). Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: Syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9264-9
3.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.SwansonH. L.LovittD.TrivediP.LinS. J. C.GouldL.YoungstromM.ShimadaS.AmtmannD. (2010). Relationship of word-and sentence-level working memory to reading and writing in second, fourth, and sixth grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0002)
4.
BerningerV. W.AmtmannD. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning difficulties (pp. 345–363). Guilford Press.
5.
BishopD. V.SnowlingM. J.ThompsonP. A.GreenhalghT.Catalise-2 Consortium AdamsC.HouseA. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721
6.
BloodG. W.MamettC.GordonR.BloodI. M. (2010). Written language disorders: Speech-language pathologists’ training, knowledge, and confidence. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/09-0032)
7.
DockrellJ. E.ConnellyV.WalterK.CrittenS. (2015). Assessing children’s writing products: The role of curriculum based measures. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3162
8.
DockrellJ. E.LindsayG.ConnellyV.MackieC. (2007). Constraints in the production of written text in children with specific language impairment. Exceptional Children, 73(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300202
9.
FallonK. A.KatzL. A. (2011). Providing written language services in the schools: The time is now. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0068)
10.
FurtakE. M.Ruiz-PrimoM. A. (2008). Making students’ thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts. Science Education, 92(5), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20270
11.
GarciaJ.FidalgoR. (2008). Orchestration of writing processes and writing products: A comparison of sixth-grade students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 6(2), 77–98. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ804516
12.
HadleyP. A. (1998). Language sampling protocols for eliciting text-level discourse. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29(3), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2903.132
13.
Hall-MillsS.ApelK. (2013). Narrative and expository writing of adolescents with language-learning disabilities: A pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740112465001
14.
HebertM.BohatyJ. J.NelsonJ. R.RoehlingJ. V. (2018). Writing informational text using provided information and text structures: An intervention for upper elementary struggling writers. Reading and Writing, 31, 2165–2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9841-x
15.
HeilmannJ.MaloneT. O. (2014). The rules of the game: Properties of a database of expository language samples. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_LSHSS-13-0050
16.
HeilmannJ.TucciA.PlanteE.MillerJ. F. (2020). Assessing functional language in school-aged children using language sample analysis. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(3), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-19-00079
17.
HoffmanL. M.IrelandM. C. (2018). A panoramic introduction to language intervention progress monitoring. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG1.161
18.
HuntK. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35(1), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165818
19.
KoutsoftasA. D. (2016). Writing process products in intermediate-grade children with and without language-based learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(6), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0133
20.
KoutsoftasA. D.GrayS. (2012). Comparison of narrative and expository writing in students with and without language-learning disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0018)
21.
KoutsoftasA. D.GrayS. (2013). A structural equation model of the writing process in typically developing sixth grade children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(6), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9399-y
22.
LundineJ. P.McCauleyR. J. (2016). A tutorial on expository discourse: Structure, development, and disorders in children and adolescents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(3), 306. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0130
23.
Marble-FlintK.KoutsoftasA. D. (2023). A feasibility study in virtual assessment procedures of a sentence-writing probe for use with intermediate-grade students. Topics in Language Disorders, 43(4), 349–366. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000322
24.
MillerJ.IglesiasA. (2004). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), English & Spanish (Version 8) [Computer Software]. Language Analysis Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
25.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. https://corestandards.org/
26.
NippoldM. A.HeskethL. J.DuthieJ. K.MansfieldT. C. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1048–1064. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/073)
27.
NippoldM. A.MansfieldT. C.BillowJ. L.TomblinJ. B. (2008). Expository discourse in adolescents with language impairments: Examining syntactic development. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0049)
28.
PetersenD. B.PetersenJ. W. (2016). Re-conceptualizing expository language as narration. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp1.SIG1.109
29.
PriceJ. R.JacksonS. C. (2015). Procedures for obtaining and analyzing writing samples of school-age children and adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46(4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0057
30.
PuranikC.KoutsoftasA. D. (2024). Writing in elementary students with language-based learning disabilities: A pilot study to examine feasibility and promise. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 55(3), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00187
31.
PuranikC. S.LombardinoL. J.AltmannL. J. P. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012)
32.
RitcheyK. D.CokerD. L.Jr. (2013). An investigation of the validity and utility of two curriculum-based measurement writing tasks. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.741957
33.
RitcheyK. D.McMasterK. L.Al OtaibaS.PuranikC. S.KimY.-S.ParkerD. C.OrtizM. (2016). Indicators of fluency writing in beginning writers. In CummingsK.PetscherY. (Eds.), The fluency construct (pp. 21–66). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
34.
ScottC. M.WindsorJ. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 43(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4302.324
35.
SunL.WallachG. P. (2014). Language disorders are learning disabilities: Challenges on the divergent and diverse paths to language learning disability. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000005
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. http://idea.ed.gov/
37.
WiigE. H.SemelE.SecordW. A. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition (CELF-5). NCS Pearson.
