This investigation identified dimensions of narrative, persuasive, and expository writing in Grades 1 to 12 and assessed the contribution of speech-language pathologists’ (SLPs) indices to scores on teachers’ 6 traits rubric. Findings could facilitate development of effective intervention programs for writing. A corpus of narrative, expository, and persuasive writing samples (N = 418) was analyzed for microstructure and macrostructure. Each genre revealed five dimensions. Writing quality included the 6 traits. Accuracy contained errors of spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Complexity encompassed mean length of T-unit and clausal density. Productivity included total number of words and number of different words for all genres, plus macrostructure for persuasion. Genre included macrostructure measures for narration and exposition and use of compromises for persuasion. Productivity scores predicted 6 traits for narration and persuasion, highlighting the important contribution of vocabulary to writing. Accuracy predicted 6 traits only for narration. Indices of genre-specific macrostructure predicted 6 traits total for all three genres.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in schools [Professional issues statement]. https://www.asha.org/policy
Berkeley County Schools. (2013). 4th and 5th grade writing folder.
4.
Blaine County School District #. 61. (n.d.). Teachers’ survival guide for creating successful writers. https://www.bcsd.k12.id.us
5.
CicchettiD. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 20, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
Georgia Department of Education. (2015). Georgia grade 5 writing assessment: Writing topics and sample papers.
9.
Hall-MillsS.ApelK. (2015). Linguistic feature development across grades and genre in elementary writing. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0043
10.
JusticeL. (2016). The syntax handbook: Everything you learned about syntax…but forgot. PRO-Ed.
11.
Kansas State Department of Education. (2008). Introduction to analytic scoring for the Kansas writing assessment: The 6-TRAIT model.
12.
KimY.OtaibaS.FolsomJ.GreulichL.PuranikC. (2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0152)
13.
KoutsoftasA.GrayS. (2012). Comparison of narrative and expository writing in students with and without language-learning disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0018)
14.
LundineJ. P.HarnishS. M.McCauleyR. J.BlackettD. S.ZezinkaA.ChenW.FoxR. A. (2018). Adolescent summaries of narrative and expository discourse: Differences and predictors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 551–568.
15.
McGrawK.WongS. (1996). Forming inferences about some interclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
16.
Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators. (2012). Oakland schools persuasive essays.
17.
MillerG.IglesiasA. (2019). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) [Computer software]. SALT Software, LLC.
18.
MillerJ.AndriacchiK.NockertsA. (2016). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (2nd ed.). SALT Software, LLC.
19.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
20.
Newport-Mesa Unified School District. (n.d.). Anchor papers: Grade 5.
21.
NippoldM.Ward-LonerganJ. (2010). Argumentative writing in pre-adolescents: The role of verbal reasoning. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659009349979
22.
NippoldM.Ward-LonerganJ.FanningJ. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/012)
PehaS. (n.d.). Student writing samples. Teaching That Makes Sense, Inc. https://www.ttms.org
25.
PriceJ.JacksonS. (2015). Procedures for obtaining and analyzing writing samples of school-age children and adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0057
26.
PuranikC.LombardinoL.AltmannL. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 17, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012)
27.
San Diego Unified School District. (2006). Samples of proficient writing with commentaries: Grade 5.
28.
ScottC. M. (2020). Language sample analysis of writing in children and adolescents: Assessment and intervention contributions. Topics in Language Disorders, 40(2), 202–220.
29.
SerryT. (2013). Capacity to support low-progress readers at school: Experiences of speech-language pathologists. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 15, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.754944
30.
SpencerT. D.PetersenD. B. (2018). Bridging oral and written language: An oral narrative language intervention study with writing outcomes. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0030
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2011). Writing assessment.
WagnerR.PuranikC.FoormanB.FosterE.WilsonL.TschinkelE.KantorP. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
