Predictors of expressive grammar were compared in formal and naturalistic assessment tasks for children with typically developing (TD) language and with Developmental Langauge Disorder (DLD). Standardized expressive language assessments were administered to 110 preschoolers. The parents of these children reported whether or not they were concerned about their child’s speech and language development. Stepwise regression analyses revealed receptive language as the only significant predictor of expressive grammar across assessment tasks. For TD preschoolers, receptive vocabulary and grammar accounted for expressive grammar performance in the formal task; however, only receptive grammar accounted for performance in the naturalistic task. For DLD preschoolers, only receptive vocabulary accounted for expressive grammar performance across both tasks. Nonverbal IQ and parent concern did not predict expressive grammar performance in either task. Implications for treatment of preschool DLD using relative strengths in vocabulary are discussed.
American Speech-Language-and-Hearing Association. (1985). Guidelines for identification audiometry. ASHA Leader, 27, 49–52.
2.
BeekeS.WilkinsonR.MaximJ. (2003). Exploring aphasic grammar. 2: Do language testing and conversation tell a similar story?Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 109–134.
3.
BishopD. (2014). Ten questions about terminology for children with unexplained language problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49, 381-415.
4.
BishopD.PriceT.DaleP.PlominR. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: II. Etiology of transient and persistent language difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 561–575.
5.
BishopD. V. M. (2017). Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of developmental language disorder (DLD). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52, 671–680.
6.
ChiatS.RoyP. (2008). Early phonological and sociocognitive skills as predictors of later language and social communication outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 635–645.
7.
CleaveP.RiceM. (1997). An examination of the morpheme BE in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 480–492.
8.
CunninghamB.RosenbaumP. (2015). A bioecological framework to evaluate communicative participation outcomes for preschoolers receiving speech–language therapy interventions in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50, 405–415.
9.
CunninghamB.WashingtonK. N.BinnsA.RolfeK.RobertsonB.RosenbaumP. (2017). Current methods of evaluating speech-language outcomes for preschoolers with communication disorders: A scoping review using the ICF-CY. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 447–464.
10.
DoddB.HuaZ.CrosbieS.HolmA.OzanneA. (2006). Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP). London, England: Psychological Corporation.
11.
DunnL.DunnL. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
12.
DunnL.DunnD. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
13.
GallinatE.SpauldingT. (2014). Differences in the performance of children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers on nonverbal cognitive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 57, 1363–1382.
14.
GlascoeF. (2000). Parents’ evaluation of developmental status: Authorized Australian version. Parkville, Australia: Centre for Community Child Health.
15.
GlogowskaM.CambellR. (2000). Investigating parental views of involvement in pre-school speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 391–405.
16.
GreenS.SalkindN. (2011). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Hayiou-ThomasM.DaleP.PlominR. (2014). Language impairment from 4 to 12 years: Prediction and etiology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 57, 850–864.
LeeL. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis: A grammatical assessment procedure for speech and language clinicians. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
20.
LeonardL. (2014). Specific language impairment across languages. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 1–5.
21.
LeonardL.CamarataS.PawlowskaM.BrownB.CamarataM. (2006). Tense and agreement morphemes in the speech of children with specific language impairment during intervention: Phase 2. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 749–770.
22.
LeonardL.CamarataS.PawlowskaM.BrownB.CamarataM. (2008). The acquisition of tense and agreement morphemes by children with specific language impairment during intervention: Phase 3. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 51, 120–125.
23.
LumJ.Conti-RamsdenG.MorganA.UllmanM. (2014). Procedural learning deficits in specific language impairment (SLI): A meta-analysis of serial reaction time task. Cortex, 51, 1–10.
24.
LumJ.Conti-RamsdenG.PageD.UllmanM. (2012). Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment. Cortex, 48, 1138–1154.
25.
LumJ.GelgecC.Conti-RamsdenG. (2010). Procedural and declarative memory in children with and without specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 96–107.
26.
McLeodS.HarrisonL.McAllisterL.McCormackJ. (2013). Speech sound disorders in a community study of preschool children. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 22, 503–522.
27.
PaulR.RothF. (2011). Characterizing and predicting outcomes of communication delays in infants and toddlers: Implications for clinical practice. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 331–340.
28.
ReillyS.BishopD.TomblinB. (2014). Terminological debate over language impairment in children: Forward movement and sticking points. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49, 452–462.
29.
RiceM.TomblinB.HoffmanL.RichmanA.MarquisJ. (2004). Grammatical tense deficits in children with SLI and nonspecific language impairment: Relationships with nonverbal IQ over time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 816–834.
30.
RiceM.WexlerK.CleaveP. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850–863.
31.
RiceM. L.WexlerK.MarquisJ.HershbergerS. (2000). Acquisition of irregular past tense by children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1126–1145.
32.
ScheryK. (1985). Correlates of language development in language-disordered children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Disorders, 50, 73–83.
33.
SealeyL.GilmoreS. (2008). Effects of sampling context on the finite verb production of children with and without delayed language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 223–258.
34.
Thomas-StonellN. L.OddsonB.RobertsonB.RosenbaumP. L. (2010). Development of the FOCUS (Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six), a communication outcome measure for preschool children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 52(1), 47–53.
35.
TomblinJ.RecordsN.BuckwalterP.ZhangX.SmithE.O’BrienM. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260.
36.
UllmanM.PierpontE. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399–433.
37.
UllmanM. T.PullmanM. Y. (2015). A compensatory role for declarative memory in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 205–222.
38.
van der LelyH.PinkerS. (2014). The biological basis of language: Insight from developmental grammatical impairments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 586–595.
39.
WashingtonK.Warr-LeeperG.Thomas-StonellN. (2011). Exploring the outcomes of a novel computer-assisted treatment program targeting expressive-grammar deficits in preschoolers with SLI. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 315–330.
40.
WashingtonK. N.FritzK.CroweK.KellyB.Wright KaremR. (2019). Bilingual preschoolers’ spontaneous productions: Considering Jamaican Creole and English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50, 179–195.
41.
WashingtonK. N.Thomas-StonellN.McLeodS.Warr-LeeperG. (2012). Parents’ perspectives on the professional-child relationship and children’s functional communication following speech-language intervention. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology [Revue Canadienne d’orthophonie et d’audiologie], 36(3), 220–233.
42.
WestbyC. (2007). Application of the ICF in children with language impairments. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 265–272.
43.
WiigE.SecordW.SemelE. (1992). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
44.
WiigE.SecordW.SemelE. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool–Second edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
45.
Wright KaremR.WashingtonK. N.CroweK.JenkinsA.LeonM.KokoteckL.. . . WestbyC. (2019). What language assessment tools and approaches are being used to establish developmental status in bilingual pre-schoolers: A scoping review using the ICF-CY. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(3), 434–451.
46.
ZambranaL.PonsF.EadieP.EivindY. (2014). Trajectories of language delay from age 3 to 5: Persistence, recovery and late onset. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49, 304–316.
