Issues related to law enforcement interactions with individuals with disabilities, communication impairments, and/or limited English language proficiency can have deleterious effects due to possible communication breakdowns. These populations are significantly more likely to be victims of a crime and are more likely to have interactions with law enforcement officers than those without disabilities. Difficulties may be encountered due to limited training and resources available to law enforcement and a lack of public awareness on the topic. This article calls upon professionals in communication sciences and disorders to raise awareness among the patients/clients and families they serve and calls on law enforcement to provide trainings, education, and exposure to various de-escalation techniques to support officers dealing with these vulnerable populations.
Accreditation Commission for Audiology Education. (2016). Accreditation standards for the doctor of audiology program. Retrieved from http://acaeaccred.org/standards/
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).
5.
BartleyJ. J. (2006). An update on autism: Science, gender, and the law. Gender Medicine, 3, 73–78.
6.
BryanK. (2004). Preliminary study of the prevalence of speech and language difficulties in young offenders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39, 391–400.
7.
BryanK.FreerJ.FurlongC. (2007). Language and communication difficulties in juvenile offenders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 505–520.
8.
ChownN. (2010). “Do you have any difficulties that I may not be aware of?” A study of autism awareness and understanding in the UK police service. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 12, 256–273.
Council for Clinical Certification in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2012). 2012 standards for the certificate of clinical competence in audiology. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Certification/2012-Audiology-Certification-Standards/
CulverL. (2004a). Adapting police services to new immigration. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
14.
CulverL. (2004b). The impact of new immigration patterns on the provision of police services in midwestern communities. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 329–344.
15.
de Tribolet-HardyF.KesicD.ThomasS. D. M. (2015). Police management of mental health crisis situations in the community: Status quo, current gaps and future directions. Policing & Society, 25, 294–307.
16.
EadensD. M.Cranston-GingrasA.DupouxE.EadensD. W. (2016). Police officer perspectives on intellectual disability. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39, 222–235.
17.
EadesD.PavlenkoA. (2017). Translating research into policy: New guidelines for communicating rights to non-native speakers. Language and Law=Linguagem e Direito, 3(2).
18.
GregoryJ.BryanK. (2010). Speech and language therapy intervention with a group of persistent and prolific young offenders in a non-custodial setting with previously undiagnosed speech, language and communication difficulties. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 202–215.
HayesS. C. (2002). Early intervention or early incarceration? Using a screening test for intellectual disability in the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 120–128.
21.
HenshawM.ThomasS. (2012). Police encounters with people with intellectual disability: Prevalence, characteristics and challenges. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 620–631.
22.
HouleA., & Niagara University. (2018). To best serve and respond to individuals with disabilities. Available from https://frdat.niagara.edu/
23.
HutchinsonD. (2011). Can technology answer law enforcements translation problems?Journal of California Law Enforcement, 45(2), 25.
24.
HutchisonM.HummerD.WooditchA. (2013). A survey of existing program strategies for offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities under correctional supervision in Pennsylvania. Probation Journal, 60, 56–72.
25.
KewleyG. D. (2001). ADHD: Recognition, reality and resolution. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research Press.
26.
McAnnanyK.ShahA. K. (2010). With their own hands: A community lawyering approach to improving law enforcement practices in the deaf community. Valparaiso University Law Review, 45, 875–925.
27.
McDonaldK. E.KeysC. B.BalcazarF. E. (2007). Disability, race/ethnicity and gender: Themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 145–161.
28.
ModellS. J.MakS. (2008). A preliminary assessment of police officers’ knowledge and perceptions of persons with disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 183–189.
PutC. E.AsscherJ. J.StamsG. J. J. M.MoonenX. M. H. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58, 992–1003.
35.
PutninsA. L. (1999). Literacy, numeracy and non-verbal reasoning skills of South Australian young offenders. Australian Journal of Education, 43, 157–171.
36.
RavaJ.ShattuckP.RastJ.RouxA. (2017). The prevalence and correlates of involvement in the criminal justice system among youth on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 340–346.
37.
RohmerO.LouvetE. (2009). Describing persons with disability: Salience of disability, gender, and ethnicity. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 76–82.
38.
SantuzziA. M.WaltzP. R.FinkelsteinL. M.RuppD. E. (2014). Invisible disabilities: Unique challenges for employees and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 204–219.
39.
ShackelfordJ.NaleS. (2016). Training law enforcement officers to differentiate traumatic brain injury from alcohol intoxication. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 43, 154–163.
SnowlingM. J.MuterV.CarrollJ. (2007). Children at family risk of dyslexia: A follow-up in early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 609–618.
42.
SpielfogelJ. E.McMillenJ. C. (2017). Current use of de-escalation strategies: Similarities and differences in de-escalation across professions. Social Work in Mental Health, 15, 232–248.
SuttonH. (2017). Increase communication between individuals with disabilities and law enforcement. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 22(9), 6–7.
VenvilleA.MealingsM.EnnalsP.OatesJ.FosseyE.DouglasJ.BigbyC. (2016). Supporting students with invisible disabilities: A scoping review of postsecondary education for students with mental illness or an acquired brain injury. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63, 571–592.
52.
Vera Institute of Justice. (2018, August16). Serving safely: The national initiative to enhance policing for persons with mental illnesses and developmental disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.vera.org/projects/serving-safely
53.
WatsonA. C.MorabitoM. S.DraineJ.OttatiV. (2008). Improving police response to persons with mental illness: A multi-level conceptualization of CIT. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 359–368.
54.
WrightA. (2016). Police interactions with individuals with developmental disabilities: Use of force, training, and implicit bias. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2903331
