School-age English learners (ELs) are faced with the challenging task of acquiring a foreign language while simultaneously reading academically demanding literature. Therefore, the current research aimed to examine the relation between the rate of grammatical tense marking errors made by ELs and their performance on measures of reading comprehension (RC). The sample for the current study included 5th-grade students who were categorized as ELs who were receiving English support services (N = 103). Samples were collected using i-Ready and writing samples. The samples were used to examine ELs’ RC in relation to tense marking errors in their written responses on the district writing assessment at the end of the school year. The results from the study revealed that there was a moderate negative correlation (r = −.431, p < .010) between verb tense errors and reading comprehension. Students with high rates of verb tense errors received lower RC scores.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993). Definitions of communication disorders and variations [Relevant Paper]. www.asha.org/policy/
2.
BerningerV. W.WinnW. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In MacArthurC.FitzgeraldJ.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (1st ed., pp. 96–114). Guilford.
3.
BishopD. (1994). Grammatical errors in specific language impairment: Competence or performance limitations?Applied Psycholinguistics, 15(4), 507–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400006895
4.
BlomE.ParadisJ. (2013). Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(1), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0112)
5.
Bowman-PerrottL. J.HerreraS.MurryK. (2010). Reading difficulties and grade retention: What’s the connection for English Language Learners?Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560903397064
6.
FlowerL. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In GreggL. W.SteinbergE. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
FlowerL.HayesJ. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/3566001981
FumeroK.WoodC. (2022). Grammatical verb errors: Differences between English Learners with and without diagnosed language-based learning disabilities. Language Speech and Hearing in the Schools, 53(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00003
10.
GrahamS.McKeownD.KiuharaS.HarrisK. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
11.
Gutiérrez-ClellenV.Simon-CereijidoG.WagnerC. (2008). Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080016
JacobsonP. F.SchwartzR. G. (2005). English past tense use in bilingual children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(5), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2005/030)
15.
JuelC.GriffithP. L.GoughP. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243
16.
KimY. S. G. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In AlvesR.LimpoT.JoshiM. (Eds.), Literacy studies: Perspectives from cognitive neurosciences, linguistics, psychology, and education: Vol. 19. Reading-writing connections (pp. 11–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
17.
KimY. S. G. (2022). Co-occurrence of reading and writing difficulties: The application of the interactive dynamic literacy model. Journal of learning disabilities, 55(6), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221942110608
18.
LeonardL. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press.
19.
MartínezR. S.HarrisB.McClainM. B. (2014). Practices that promote English reading for English learners (ELs). Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 24(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.903192
20.
MontrulS. (2011). Morphological errors in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000720
National Report Card. (2019). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1992–2022 Reading Assessments. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/nation/scores/?grade=4
RiceM. L.WexlerK. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(6), 1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3906.1239
U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition. (2017). English learner tool kit (2nd Rev. ed.).
28.
VerhoevenL.SteengeJ.van BalkomH. (2011). Verb morphology as clinical marker of specific language impairment: Evidence from first and second language learners. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 1186–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.001
