This study investigated the feasibility of multicomponent linguistic awareness intervention on early literacy skills in at-risk kindergarteners. Seventeen students, including native Spanish-speaking English language learners (n = 10) and native English speakers (n = 7), participated in a 6-week small-group therapy program, for a total of 12 intervention hours. Students received therapy in one of the following: phonological awareness and letter knowledge; morphological awareness; or a three-pronged intervention that addressed all three areas. Students demonstrated moderate to large gains in word reading (d = 1.79–2.19), phonological awareness (d = 0.73–1.59), morphological awareness (d = 0.57–3.96), and morphological spelling (d = 0.77–3.0). Analyses revealed no significant differences based on the type of intervention received. These results provide preliminary evidence for the feasibility of three-pronged linguistic awareness instruction for kindergarten students at risk for later reading difficulties, including English language learners, in intensive intervention programs.
ApelK.BrimoD.DiehmE.ApelL. (2013). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarten, first, and second grade students from low SES homes: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 161–173. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/12-0042)
2.
ApelK.DiehmE. (2013). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75. doi:10.1177/0022219413509964
3.
ApelK.LawrenceJ. (2011). Contributions of morphological awareness skills to word-level reading and spelling in first-grade children with and without speech sound disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1312–1327. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0115)
4.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (2006). Developing literacy in second language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BeckI.McKeownM.KucanL. (2002). Bringing word to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BerningerV. W.AbottR. D.ThomsonJ.WagnerR.SwansonH. L.WijsmanE. M.RaskindW. (2006). Modeling phonological core deficits within a working memory architecture in children and adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 165–198. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_3
7.
BowersP.KirbyJ.DeaconS. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. doi:10.3102/0034654309359353
8.
CarlisleJ. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
CoyneM.Kame’enuiE.SimmonsD.HarnB. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104. doi:10.1177/00222194040370020101
11.
FilippiniA.GerberM.LeafstedtJ. (2012). A vocabulary-added reading intervention for English learners at-risk of reading difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 14–26. Available from www.internationaljournalofspecialeducation.com/
12.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
13.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (Eds.). (2011). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) next. Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
14.
GoodwinA.AhnS. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208.
15.
GoodwinA.AhnS. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. doi:10.1080/10888438.2012.689791
16.
JusticeL. (2006). Evidence-based practice, response to intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 284–297. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/033)
17.
MorrisR.LovettM.WolfM.SevickR.SteinbachK.FrijtersJ.ShapiroM. (2012). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 99–127. doi:10.1177/0022219409355472
18.
National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
RamirezG.WaltonP.RobertsW. (2013). Morphological awareness and vocabulary development among kindergarteners with different ability levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 54–64. doi:10.1177/0022219413509970
23.
ReedD. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00261.x
24.
RiceM. L.WexlerK. (2001). Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment Screener (TEGI). The Psychological Corporation, a Harcourt Assessment Company. Retrieved from https://cldp.ku.edu/rice-wexler-tegi
25.
RothF.WorthingtonC.TroiaG. (2012). Promoting Awareness of Speech Sounds (PASS). Attainment Company. Retrieved from http://www.attainmentcompany.com/pass
26.
SnowC.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
TorgesenJ.WagnerR.RashotteC. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
28.
VadasyP.SandersE.PeytonJ. (2006). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 365–378.
29.
WagnerR.TorgesenJ.RashotteC. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
30.
WolterJ. A.DilworthV. (2013). The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 76–85. doi:10.1177/0022219413509972
31.
WolterJ. A.GreenL. (2011, November). Morphological awareness intervention: Techniques for promoting language & literacy success. Symposium presentation at the annual American Speech Language Hearing Association, San Diego, CA.
32.
WolterJ. A.GreenL. (2013, November). Word detectives: Using morphological awareness to improve language and literacy. Symposium presentation at the annual American Speech Language Hearing Association, Chicago, IL.
33.
WolterJ. A.WoodA.D’zatkoK. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0001)
