This study assessed service integration promoted by home visitors and community coalitions in Baltimore's Comprehensive Family Support Strategy. The study first assessed home visitors' coordination of services for their clients. Two yearly home visitors surveys (n = 32) assessed changes in their perceptions of 11 community resources' availability, service quality, and referrals made to those resources. There were statistically significant increases in the percentage of home visitors who (a) reported availability of seven resources, (b) gave high service quality ratings for six resources, and (c) referred clients to all 11 resources. The study also assessed six community coalitions' actions to promote service integration during 1 year through observation of coalition meetings. Coalitions discussing more service integration exhibited greater increases in home visitors' perceptions of high service quality and referrals. Home visiting practitioners should consider including coalitions as part of their program models in order to better link clients to appropriate community resources.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (1998). The role of home-visitation programs in improving health outcomes for children and families.Pediatrics, 101, 486-489.
2.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2004).Kids count data book 2004. Baltimore: Author.
3.
Backer, T. (2003).Evaluation community coalitions. New York: Springer.
4.
Baker, A., Piotrkowski, C., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1999). The Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY).Future of Children, 9, 116-133.
5.
Breer, P., McAuliffe, W., & Levine, E. (1996). Statewide substance abuse prevention planning.Evaluation Review, 20, 596-618.
6.
Broussard, L., & Blankenship, F. (1996). Shots for Tots: Louisiana's infant immunization initiative.Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses, 1, 113-116.
7.
Chen, H. (1990).Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Duggan, A., Fuddy, L., Burrell, L., Higman, S., McFarlane, E., Windham, A., et al. (2004). Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse: Impact in reducing parental risk factors.Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 623-643.
9.
Duggan, A., McFarlane, E., Windham, A., Rohde, C., Salkever, D., Fuddy, L., et al. (1999). Evaluation of Hawaii's Healthy Start Program.Future of Children, 9, 66-90.
10.
Fawcett, S., Lewis, R., Paine-Andrews,A.,Francisco,V.,Richter,K., Williams, E., et al. (1997). Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: The case of Project Freedom. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 812-828.
11.
Francisco, V. T., Paine, A., & Fawcett, S. B. (1993). A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 8, 403-416
12.
Freudenberg, N., & Golub, M. (1987). Health education, public policy and disease prevention: A case history of the New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning.Health Education Quarterly, 14, 387-401.
13.
Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effect of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems.Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 401-421.
14.
Goodman, R., Wandersman, A., Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Morrissey, E. (1996). An ecological assessment of communitybased interventions for prevention and health promotion: Approaches to measuring community coalitions.American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 33-61.
15.
Health Resources and Services Administration. (1999).Achieving service integration for children with special health care needs: An assessment of alternative Medicaid managed care models. Rockville, MD: Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Hebbeler, K., & Gerlach-Downie, S. (2002). Inside the black box of home visiting: A qualitative analysis of why intended outcomes were not achieved.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 28-51.
18.
Hoge, M., & Howenstine, R. (1997). Organizational development strategies for integrating mental health services.Community Mental Health Journal, 33, 175-187.
19.
Kaftarian, S., & Hansen, W. (Eds.). (1994). CSAP special issue: Community partnership program, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention [Special issue].Journal of Community Psychology.
20.
Kegler, M., Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., & Malek, S. (1998). A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina.Health Education Research, 13, 225-238.
21.
Lewis, R., Paine-Andrews, A., Fisher, J., Custard, C., Fleming-Randle, M., & Fawcett, S. (1999). Reducing the risk for adolescent pregnancy: Evaluation of a school-community partnership in a midwestern military community.Family and Community Health, 22, 16-30.
22.
Mayer, J., Soweid, R., Dabney, S., Brownson, C., Goodman, R., & Brownson, R. (1998). Practices of successful community coalitions: A multiple case study.American Journal of Health Behavior, 22, 368-377.
23.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2003).Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
National Commission to Prevent Infant Mortality. (1989).Home visiting: Opening doors for America's pregnant women and children. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
National Healthy Start Association. (2004).The Healthy Start Program. Baltimore: Author.
26.
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, H., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R., & Tatelbaum, R. (1999). Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings.Future of Children, 9, 44-65.
27.
Paine-Andrews, A., Fisher, J., Patton, J., Fawcett, S., Williams, E., Lewis, R., et al. (2002). Analyzing the contribution of community change to population health outcomes in an adolescent pregnancy prevention initiative.Health Education & Behavior, 29, 183-193.
28.
Patton, M. (2002).Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2002).National program project report: Intensive home visiting services for new parents. Princeton, NJ: Author.
30.
Roussos, S., & Fawcett, S. (2000). A review of collaborative part-nerships as a strategy for improving community health.Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369-402.
31.
Safe and Sound Campaign. (1999, February).A comprehensive family support strategy. Baltimore: Author. St.
32.
Pierre, R., Layzer, J., Goodson, B., & Bernstein, L. (1997). National impact evaluation of the Comprehensive Child Development Program: Final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
33.
Thompson, B., Spickard, A., & Dixon, G. (2001).Fighting back: The first eight years mobilizing people and communities in the fight against substance abuse. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
34.
U. S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1990).Creating caring communities: Blueprint for an effective federal policy on child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
Vincent, M., Clearie, A., & Schluchter, M. (1987). Reducing adolescent pregnancy through school and community-based education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 257, 3382-3386.
36.
Wagner, M., & Clayton, S. (1999). The Parents as Teachers Program: Results from two demonstrations.Future of Children, 9, 91-115.
37.
Weick, K. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems.American Psychologist, 39, 40-49.
38.
Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. Connell, A. Kubish, L. Schorr, & C. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-92). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
39.
Wolff, T. (2001). Community coalition building–Contemporary practice and research: Introduction.American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 165-172.
