The Community Coalition Action Theory (CCAT) blends practice wisdom with empirical data to explain how community coalitions achieve community change and community capacity outcomes. The current study uses data from an evaluation of 20 California Healthy Cities and Communities coalitions to test relationships between coalition factors and outcomes as predicted by CCAT in two stages of coalition development. Data are from two rounds of coalition member surveys, interviews with local coalition coordinators, and semiannual progress reports. Consistent with CCAT predictions and prior research, shared decision making and leadership were correlated with participation; staff competence, task focus, and cohesion were correlated with member satisfaction. Coalition size was associated with participation and dollars leveraged. Also, consistent with CCAT, diversity of funding sources was associated with new leadership opportunities and program expansion; dollars leveraged was correlated with new leadership opportunities and new partners. Findings provide preliminary support for many, but not all, of the relationships predicted by CCAT.
Ansari, W., & Phillips, C. ( 2004). The costs and benefits to participants in community partnerships: A paradox? Health Promotion Practice, 5, 35-48.
2.
Bauer, D.J., Preacher, K.J., & Gil, K.M. ( 2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations . Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
3.
Braithwaite, R., Taylor, S., & Austin, J. ( 2000). Building health coalitions in the Black community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Butterfoss, F., Goodman, R., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23, 65-79.
5.
Butterfoss, F., & Kegler, M. ( 2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. In R. J. DiClemente , R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 194-227). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Butterfoss, F., & Kegler, M. ( 2009). The community coalition action theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (2nd ed., pp. 157-193). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Butterfoss, F.D., Gilmore, L.A., Krieger, J.W., LaChance, L.L., Lara, M., Meurer, J.R., . . . Rosenthal, M.P. (2006). From formation to action: How allies against asthma coalitions are getting the job done. Health Promotion Practice, 7, 34S-43S.
8.
Butterfoss, F.D., Morrow, A.L., Webster, J.D., & Crews, C. ( 2003). The Coalition Training Institute: Training for the long haul. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 9, 522-529.
9.
Cassell, C., Santelli, J., Gilbert, B., Dalmat, M., Mezoff, J., & Schauer, M. ( 2005). Mobilizing communities: An overview of the Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3 Suppl.), S3-S10.
10.
Chavis, D., Florin, P., Rich, R., & Wandersman, A. (1987). Sense of community index. The role of block associations in crime control and community development (The Block Booster Project. Final Report to the Ford Foundation). New York, NY: Citizens Committee for New York City .
11.
Chaskin, R., Brown, P., Vankatesh, S., & Vidal, A. ( 2001). Building community capacity. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
12.
Clark, N., Doctor, L., Friedman, A., Lachance, L., Houle, C., Geng, X., & Grisso, J. ( 2006). Community coalitions to control chronic disease: Allies against asthma as a model and case study. Health Promotion Practice, 7(2), 13S-22S.
13.
Crowley, K., Yu, P., & Kaftarian, S. ( 2000). Prevention actions and activities make a difference: A structural equation model of coalition building. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 381-388.
14.
Davis, J., Smith, T., & Marsden, P. ( 2007). General social surveys, 1972-2006: Cumulative. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
15.
Eng, E., & Parker, E. ( 1994). Measuring community competence in the Mississippi Delta: The interface between program evaluation and program empowerment. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 199-220.
16.
Feinberg, M., Greenberg, M., & Osgood, D. ( 2004). Readiness, functioning and perceived effectiveness in community prevention coalitions: A study of communities that care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 163-176.
17.
Feinberg, M., Greenberg, M., Osgood, D., Sartorius, J., & Bontempo, C. ( 2007). Effects of the communities that care model in Pennsylvania on youth risk and problem behaviors. Prevention Science, 8, 261-270.
18.
Florin, P., Mitchell, R., Stevenson, J., & Klein, I. ( 2000). Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: A developmental perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning , 23, 341-346.
19.
Goodman, R.M., Speers, M., McLeroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E., . . . Wallerstein, N. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 258-278.
20.
Granner, M., & Sharpe, P. ( 2004). Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: A summary of measurement tools. Health Education & Behavior , 19, 514-532.
21.
Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Livert, D., & Kadushin, C. ( 2003). Fighting back against substance abuse: Are community coalitions winning? American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 23, 237-245.
22.
Hays, C., Hays, S., DeVille, J., & Mulhall, P. ( 2000). Capacity for effectiveness: The relationship between coalition structure and community impact. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 373-379.
23.
Jasuja, G., Chou, C., Bernstein, K., Wang, E., McClure, M., & Pentz, M. ( 2005). Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 173-184.
24.
Kegler, M., Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., & Malek, S. ( 1998). Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of 10 Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina . Health Education & Behavior, 25, 338-353.
25.
Kegler, M., Twiss, J., & Look, V. ( 2000). Assessing community change at multiple levels: The genesis of an evaluation framework for the California Healthy Cities and Communities project. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 760-779.
26.
Kegler, M., Williams, C., Cassell, C., Santelli, J., Kegler, S.Montgomery, S., . . . Hunt, S.C. ( 2005). Mobilizing communities for teen pregnancy prevention: Associations between coalition characteristics and perceived accomplishments . Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3 Suppl.), S31-S41.
27.
Kegler, M., Norton, B., & Aronson, R. ( 2008a). Achieving organizational change: Findings from case studies of 20 California Healthy Cities and Communities coalitions. Health Promotion International, 23, 109-118.
28.
Kegler, M., Norton, B., & Aronson R. ( 2008b). Strengthening community leadership: Evaluation findings from the California Healthy Cities and Communities program. Health Promotion Practice, 9, 170-179.
29.
Kumpher, K., Turner, C., Hopkins, R., & Librett, J. ( 1993). Leadership and team effectiveness in community coalitions for the prevention of alcohol and other drug abuse. Health Education Research, 8, 359-374.
30.
Lasker, R., Weiss, E., & Miller R. ( 2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Quarterly , 79, 179-205.
31.
Norton, B., Burdine, J., McLeroy, K., Felix, M., & Dorsey, A. ( 2002). Community capacity: Theoretical roots and conceptual challenges. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 194-227). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. ( 2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 36, 23-42.
33.
Robinson, W. ( 1950). Ecological correlation and the behavior of individuals . American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
34.
Rogers, T., Howard-Pitney, B., Feighery, E., Altman, D., Endres, J., & Roeseler, A. ( 1993). Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California. Health Education Research , 8, 345-357.
35.
Putnam, R. ( 1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. American Prospect, 24, 34-48.
36.
Twiss, J., Duma, S., Look, V., Shaffer, G., & Watkins, A. ( 2000). Twelve years and counting: California Healthy Cities and Communities. Public Health Reports, 115, 125-134.
37.
Weiss, E., Anderson, R., & Lasker, R. ( 2002). Making the most of collaboration: Exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning. Health Education & Behavior, 29, 683-698.
38.
Zakocs, R., & Guckenburg, S. (2007). What coalition factors foster community capacity? Lessons learned from the Fighting Back Initiative . Health Education & Behavior, 34, 354-375.
39.
Zakocs, R.C., & Edwards, E.M. ( 2006). What explains community coalition effectiveness? A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 30, 351-361.
