Community coalition action theory (CCAT) depicts the processes and factors that affect coalition formation, maintenance, institutionalization, actions, and outcomes. CCAT proposes that community context affects coalitions at every phase of development and operation. We analyzed data from 12 Connect to Protect coalitions using inductive content analysis to examine how contextual factors (e.g., economics, collaboration, history, norms, and politics) enhance or impede coalitions’ success in achieving outcomes. Consistent with CCAT, context affected the objectives that coalitions developed and those they completed. Results suggest that local prevention history and political support have particular impact on coalitions’ success in creating structural changes. These data underscore the heuristic value of CCAT, yet also imply that the contextual constructs that affect outcomes are issue specific.
AllenN. E.JavdaniS.LahrnerA. L.WaldenA. L. (2012). “Changing the text”: Modeling council capacity to produce institutionalized change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 317-331.
2.
AuerbachJ. (2009). Transforming social structures and environments to help in HIV prevention. Health Affairs, 28, 1655-1665.
3.
AuerbachJ. D.ParkhurstJ. O.CáceresC.F. (2011). Addressing social drivers of HIV/AIDS for the long-term response: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Global Public Health, 6(Suppl. 3), S293-S309.
4.
BlankenshipK. M.FriedmanS. R.DworkinS.MantellJ. E. (2006). Structural interventions: Concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. Journal of Urban Health, 83(1), 59-72.
5.
ButterfossF. D.KeglerM. (2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions. Moving from practice to theory. In DiClementeR. J.CrosbyR. A.KeglerM. C. (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 194-227). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
ChutuapeK. S.WillardN.SanchezK.StraubD. M.OchoaT. N.HowellK., . . . The Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (2010). Mobilizing communities around HIV prevention: How three coalitions applied key strategies to bring about structural changes. AIDS Education and Prevention, 22(1), 15-27.
7.
ClarkN. M.LachanceL.DoctorL. J.GilmoreL.KellyC.KriegerJ.WilkinM. (2010). Policy and system change and community coalitions: Outcomes from allies against asthma. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 904-912.
8.
FawcettS. B.FranciscoV. T.HyraD.Paine-AndrewsA.SchultzJ. A.RoussosS.EvensenP. (2000). Building healthy communities. In TarlovA. (Ed.), Society and population health reader: State and community applications (pp. 75-93). New York: New Press.
9.
FriedanT. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: The health impact pyramid. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 590-595.
10.
KeglerM. C.HallS. M.KiserM. (2010). Facilitators, challenges, and collaborative activities in faith and health partnerships to address health disparities. Health Education & Behavior, 37, 665-679.
11.
KeglerM. C.MinerK. (2004). Environmental health promotion interventions: Considerations for preparation and practice. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 510-525.
12.
KeglerM. C.RiglerJ.HoneycuttS. (2010). How does community context influence coalition in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the community coalition action theory. BMC Public Health, 1, 90-92.
13.
KeglerM. C.SwanD. W. (2011). An initial attempt at operationalizing and testing the community coalition action theory. Health Education & Behavior, 38, 261-269.
14.
LinkB. G.PhelanJ. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Spec No, 80-94.
15.
MillerR. L.ReedS. J.FranciscoV. T., The Adolescent Medical Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (in press). Accomplishing structural change: Identifying intermediate indicators of success. American Journal of Community Psychology.
16.
MillerR. L.ReedS. J.FranciscoV. T.EllenJ. M., The Adolescent Medical Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (2012). Conflict transformation, stigma, and HIV-preventive structural change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 378-392.
17.
Rothrum-BorusM. J. (2000). Expanding the range of interventions to reduce HIV among adolescents. AIDS, 14, S33-S40.
18.
SumartojoE. (2000). Structural factors in HIV prevention: Concepts, examples, and implications for research. AIDS, 14, S3-S10.
19.
StephensE. (2011). Application of theory to practice. A case study analysis of the community coalition action theory in a state comprehensive cancer control program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
20.
StraubD. M.Griffin-DeedsB.WillardN.CastorJ.PeraltaL.FranciscoV. T., The Adolescents Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (2007). Partnership selection and formation: A case study of developing adolescent health community-researcher partnerships in fifteen U.S. Communities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 489-498.
WillardN.ChutuapeK.StinesS.EllenJ., the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (2012). Bridging the gap between individual level risk for HIV and structural determinants: Using root cause analysis in strategic planning. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10852352.2012.660122
23.
ZiffM.HarperG.ChutuapeK.DeedsB. G.FuttermanD.FranciscoV. T.EllenJ., for the Adolescent Trial Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (2006). Laying the foundation for Connect to Protect®: A multi-site community mobilization intervention to reduce HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence among urban youth. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 506-522.
