Alarmed by research that reveals Hungary as having one of the lowest reporting rates in cases of sexual violence in Europe, this article provides an overview of the research that explains why, historically, sexual violence has been and continues to be underreported all over the globe, from law enforcement and criminal justice perspective. Furthermore, we describe the unique circumstances that might influence Hungarian victims of sexual violence to make formal reports. Among other possible factors, we discuss rape myth acceptance, victim blaming, feminist activism, institutional betrayal, and media representations of rape. In an effort to provide insight into Hungarian gender politics, this article raises salient theoretical works on gender ideology and gender policy in contemporary Hungary. This article concludes with a discussion on what implications such research in Hungary may have on a global understanding of sexual violence reporting.
AhrensC. A.CampbellR.Ternier-ThamesN. K.WascoS. M.SeflT. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38–49.
3.
AllenW. D. (2007). The reporting and underreporting of rape. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 623–641.
4.
BachmanR. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest. New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 8–29.
5.
BarátE. (2018). Az előjogainak sérülését helyreállítani igyekvő “dühös államférfi” “nő”-ellenes hadjárata [“Mysognist” war of the “furious statesman” in an urge to restore harmed prerogatives]. Társadalmi Nemek Tudománya Interdiszciplináris Folyóirat, 8(1), 32–45.
6.
BendixenM.HelleS.LangbachT.RasmussenK. (2014). Voldtektsmyter og kjønnssjåvinisme blant norske lekdommere og fagdommere [Rape myths and sexism among Norwegian judges]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 51, 7–13.
7.
BieberF. (2018). Is nationalism on the rise? Assessing global trends. Ethnopolitics, 17(5), 519–540.
8.
BodaZ.Medve-BálintG. (2014). Does institutional trust in East Central Europe differ from Western Europe?European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 3(2), 1–17.
9.
BodorÁ.GrünhutZ. (2015). Társadalmi rétegződés Magyarországon a bizalom mentén [Social stratification in Hungary along the level of trust]. Századvég, 78(20), 19–47.
BohnerG.EysselF.PinaA.SieblerF.VikiG. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In HorvathM.BrownJ. (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Willan.
13.
BrooksO.BurmanM. (2017). Reporting rape: Victim perspectives on advocacy support in the criminal justice process. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17, 209–225.
14.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon and Schuster.
15.
BurgessA. W.HolmstromL. L. (1974). Rape trauma syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131(9), 981–986.
16.
BurrowesN. (2013). Responding to the challenge of rape myths in court: A guide for prosecutors. NB Research.
17.
BuzogányA. (2017). Illiberal democracy in Hungary: Authoritarian diffusion or domestic causation?Democratization, 24(7), 1307–1325.
18.
CampbellR. (2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence and Victims, 20(1), 55–68.
19.
CampbellR. (2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems do rape victim advocates make a difference?Violence Against Women, 12, 30–45.
20.
CampbellR.WascoS.AhrensC.SeflT.BarnesH. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239–1259.
21.
ChenY.UllmanS. E. (2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the national violence against women survey. Violence Against Women, 16, 262–279.
22.
CohnA. M.ZinzowH. M.ResnickH. S.KilpatrickD. G. (2013). Correlates of reasons for not reporting rape to police: Results from a national telephone household probability sample of women with forcible or drug or- alcohol facilitated/ incapacitated rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(3), 455–473.
du MontJ.MillerK.MyhrT. L. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9(4), 466–486.
EysselF.BohnerG. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1579–1605.
31.
FelsonR. B.PareP. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610.
32.
FilipasH. H.UllmanS. E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence & Victims, 16, 673–692.
33.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
34.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. U.S. Department of Justice.
35.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T.TurnerM. E. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6–38.
36.
FrazierP. A.HaneyB. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police prosecutor and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behaviour, 20, 607–628.
37.
FreseB.MoyaM.MegíasJ. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 143–161.
GregorA.KovátsE. (2019). Work-life: Balance? Tensions between care and paid work in the lives of Hungarian women. Social Science Review, 7, 91–116.
40.
GrubbA.TurnerE. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452.
GrzebalskaW.PetőA. (2018, May–June). The gendered modus operandi of the illiberal transformation in Hungary and Poland. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68, 164–172.
43.
GylysJ. A.McNamaraJ. R. (1996). Acceptance of rape myths among prosecuting attorneys. Psychological Reports, 79, 15–18.
44.
HammondE. M.BerryM. A.RodriguezD. N. (2011). The influence on rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief on a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 242–252.
45.
HayesR. M.AbbottR. L.CookS. (2016). It’s her fault: Student acceptance of rape myths on two college campuses. Violence Against Women, 22(13), 1540–1555.
46.
HayesR. M.LorenzK.BellK. A. (2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 202–220.
47.
HeathN. M.LynchS. M.FritchA. M.WongM. M. (2013). Rape myth acceptance impacts the reporting of rape to the police: A study of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 19(9), 1065–1078.
48.
HermanJ. L. (2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror. Hachette.
49.
HochschildA. (2000). The nanny chain. The American Prospect, 11, 1–4.
JohnsonJ. D.RussI. (1989). Effects of salience of consciousness-raising information on perception of acquaintance versus stranger rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1182–1197.
53.
JordanJ. (2004). Beyond belief? Police, rape and women’s credibility. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 4, 29–59.
54.
KilpatrickD. G.EdmundsC. N.SeymourA. K. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. National Victim Center and Medical University of South Carolina.
55.
KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.RuggieroK. J.ConoscentiL. M.McCauleyJ. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. U.S. Department of Justice.
KrahéB. (1991). Police officers’ definitions of rape: A prototype study. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 223–244.
58.
KrahéB.TemkinJ.BieneckS.BergerA. (2008). Prospective lawyers’ rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14(5), 461–479.
59.
KrekóP.EnyediZ. s. (2018). Explaining Eastern Europe: Orban’s laboratory of illiberalism. Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 39–51.
60.
LittletonH. L.AxsomD.BreitkopfC. R.BerensonA. (2006). Rape acknowledgment and postassault experiences: How acknowledgement status relates to disclosure, coping, worldview, and reactions received from others. Violence and Victims, 21, 761–778.
61.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
62.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.
LovettJ.UzelacG.HorváthM. (2007). Rape in the 21st century: Old behaviors, new contexts and emerging patterns. ESRC End of Award Report (RES-000-22-1679). Economic and Social Research Council.
65.
NyúlB.KendeA.EngyelM.SzabóM. (2018). Perception of a perpetrator as a successful person predicts decreased moral judgment of a rape case and labeling it as rape. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2555. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02555
66.
MadiganL.GambleN. (1991). The second rape: Society’s continued betrayal of the victim. Lexington Books.
67.
MaierS.L. (2008). “I have heard horrible stories…”: Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14(7), 786–808.
68.
McClintockA. (1993). Family feuds: Gender, nationalism and the family. Feminist Review, 44, 61−80.
69.
McGregorM. J.WiebeE.MarionS. A.LivingstoneC. (2000). Why don’t more women report sexual assault to the police? (Research letter). Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162, 659–662.
70.
McMahonS. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(1), 3–11.
71.
MooreB. M.BakerT. (2018). An exploratory examination of college students’ likelihood of reporting sexual assault to police and university officials: Results of a self-report survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3419–3438.
72.
PageA. D. (2008). Judging women and defining crime: Police officers’ attitudes toward women and rape. Sociological Spectrum, 28(4), 389–411.
ParrattK. A.PinaA. (2017). From “real rape” to real justice: A systematic review of police officers’ rape myth beliefs. Aggression and Violent Behavior34, 68–83.
75.
PartiK.SzabóJ.VirágG. y. (2016). A média azt üzente…Szexuális erőszakkal kapcsolatos ismeretek, vélemények és attitűdök vizsgálata egy médiakampány kapcsán, [It was in the TV…Knowledge, opinions, attitudes about rape myths following a media campaign]. Médiakutató, 16(2), 7–24.
76.
PartiK.SzabóJ.VirágG. y. (2017a). A szexuális erőszak jellemzői egy aktakutatás tükrében [Characteristics of sexual violence in a criminal file based research]. In PartiK. (Ed.), Szexuális erőszak: Mítosz és valóság. Kutatások a szexuális erőszakról (pp. 159–200).Országos Kriminológiai Intézet.
77.
PartiK.SzabóJ.VirágG. y. (2017b). Szexuális eröszak—OKRI kutatás egy bünmegelözési kampány kapcsán [Sexual violence—A research of NICH following a crime prevention campaign]. Kriminológiai Közlemények, 77, 129–153.
78.
PattersonD.CampbellR. (2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191–205.
79.
PaulL. A.ZinzowH. M.McCauleyJ. L.KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S. (2014). Does encouragement by others increase rape reporting? Findings from a national sample of Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 222–232.
80.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 1(33), 27–68.
81.
PetersonZ. D.MuehlenhardC. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 51, 129–144.
82.
PetőA. (2003). Memory and the narrative of rape in Budapest and Vienna in 1945. In BesselR.SchumannD. (Eds.), Life after Death. Approaches to a cultural and social history of Europe during the 1940s and 1950s (pp. 129–148). Publications of the German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press.
83.
PetőA. (2018). Elmondani az Elmondhatatlant. [To Tell the Unspeakable]. Jaffa.
84.
PetõA. (2019). Szexualitás és társadalmi tükrözõdése. A normaváltás nehézségei: a #Metoo tanulságai [Sexuality and social reflection. Difficulties of norm changing: The case of #Metoo]. Journal of History of Culture, Science and Medicine, 10(18), 147–151.
RussellD. E. H.BolenR. M. (2000). The epidemic of rape and child sexual abuse in the United States. SAGE.
88.
SabinaC.HoL. Y. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 15(3), 201–226.
89.
SchullerR.StewartA. (2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 535–551.
SerughettiG. (2019, January11). Why Orban’s Hungary is afraid of Feminism and Academic Freedom (and George Soros, of course). Reset DOC: Dialogues on Civilizations.
92.
SleathE.BullR. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 642–661.
93.
SmithC. P.FreydJ. J. (2013). Dangerous safe havens: Institutional betrayal exacerbates sexual trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26, 119–124.
94.
SmithC. P.FreydJ. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575–587.
95.
SmithO.SkinnerT. (2017). How rape myths are used and challenged in rape and sexual assault trials. Social & Legal Studies, 26(4), 441–466.
96.
SnyderM.MieneP. (1994). On the functions of stereotypes and prejudice. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (pp. 33–54). Erlbaum.
97.
SpohnR.BjornsenA.WrightE. M. (2017). Factors associated with reporting of sexual assault among college and non-college women. Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research, 9(4), 279–289.
98.
StaubliS. (2017). Trusting the police: Comparisons across Eastern and Western Europe. (Kultur und soziale Praxis, Trans.). Transcript Verlag.
99.
StewartA. L.MaddrenK. (1997). Police officers’ judgement of blame in family violence: The impact of gender and alcohol. Sex Roles, 37, 921–934.
100.
SuarezE.GadallaT. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035.
101.
SuzukiY. E.BonnerH. S. (2017). Factors associated with college students’ responses to rape-disclosure scenarios: Influence of gender, rape characteristics, and opinions about health care professionals. Journal of School Violence, 16(2), 160–172.
102.
SymondsM. ([1980] 2010). The “second injury” to victims of violent acts. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70(1), 34–41.
103.
SzécsiN.GéraE. (2015). A budapesti úrinő magánélete, 1860–1914 [The private life of a budapest lady, 1860–1914]. Európa.
104.
TarleaS. (2017). Higher education governance in Central and Eastern Europe: A perspective on Hungary and Poland. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 670–683.
105.
TemkinJ.GrayJ. M.BarrettJ. (2018). Different functions of rape myth use in court: Findings from a trial observation study. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 205–226.
106.
TemkinJ.KrahéB. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Hart Publications.
107.
TimárJ. (2019). Hungarian feminist geography in a curved space?Gender, Place & Culture, 26(7–9), 1094–1102.
108.
UhdeZ. (2016). From women’s struggles to distorted emancipation: The interplay of care practices and global capitalism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(3), 390–408.
109.
UllmanS. E. (1999). Social support and recovery from sexual as-sault: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 4, 343–358.
110.
UllmanS. E.FilipasH. H.TowsendS. M.StarzynskiL. L. (2007). Psychosocial correlates of PTSD symptom severity in sexual assault survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 821–831.
111.
VenemaR. M. (2014). Police officer schema of sexual assault reports: Real rape, ambiguous cases, and false reports. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(1), 25–44.
112.
VidaB. (2020). New waves of anti-sexual and reproductive health and rights strategies in the European Union: The anti-gender discourse in Hungary. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 27(2), 13–16.
113.
VirágG. y. (2004). Sexual violence. In IrkF. (Ed.), Victims and Opinions, Part II (pp. 71–83). Országos Kriminológiai Intézet.
114.
WalbyS. (2011). The future of feminism. Polity Press.
115.
WilsonM.ScholesA. (2009). The typical rape: Factors affecting victims’ decision to report. In WoodJ.GannonT. (Eds.), Public opinion and criminal justice (pp. 123–144). Willan.
Wolitzky-TaylorK. B.ResnickH. S.McCauleyJ. L.AmstadterA. B.KilpatrickD. G.RuggieroK. J. (2011). Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the national women’s study-replication. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 807–832.
118.
YangO. K. (2006). Family and new governance. Ewha Woman’s University Press.
119.
ZimanyiE. (2020). Family borders: Hungary’s campaign for the “Family Protection Action Plan.”Feminist Media Studies, 20(2), 305–309.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
