Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Are Rape Myths Inherently Gendered? Examining Assumed Gender Ascribed to Gender-Neutral Versions of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale Among College Students
Rape myths are false beliefs about sexual violence that shift blame to the victim rather than the perpetrator. The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) scale measures these myths, but critiques have led to the creation of gender-neutral versions. This study aimed to investigate how participants perceive gender in these versions. Surveys were given to U.S. college students, with variations in victim and perpetrator gender. Results showed no significant differences in IRMA scores based on gender-neutral versions. However, most participants still associated a female victim and a male perpetrator with sexual assault, indicating the persistent gendered nature of rape myths.
AndersonG.OverbyR. (2020). The impact of rape myths and current events on the well-being of sexual violence survivors. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220937782
2.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL.SweeneyB. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483
3.
BaberK. M.TuckerC. J. (2006). The social roles questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y
4.
BanyardV. L.DemersJ. M.CohnE. S.EdwardsK. M.MoynihanM. M.WalshW. A.WardS. K. (2020). Academic correlates of unwanted sexual contact, intercourse, stalking, and intimate partner violence: An understudied but important consequence for college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21–22), 4375–4392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715022
5.
BasileK.C.SmithS.G.KresnowM.KhatiwadaS.LeemisR.W. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Sexual Violence. GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nisvs/documentation/nisvsReportonSexualViolence.pdf
6.
BasileK. C.SmithS. G.LiuY.KresnowM. J.FasulaA. M.GilbertL.ChenJ. (2018). Rape-related pregnancy and association with reproductive coercion in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(6), 770–776. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.amepre.2018.07.028
7.
BierieD. M.Davis-SiegelJ. C. (2014). Measurement matters: Comparing old and new definitions of rape in federal statistical reporting. Sexual Abuse, 27(5), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214521470
8.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Secker and Warburg.
9.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
10.
CananS. N.CozzolinoL.MyersJ. L.JozkowskiK. N. (2023). Does gender inclusive language affect psychometric properties of the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale-short form? A two-sample validation study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3-4), 3373–3394. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221106144
11.
CananS.N.JozkowskiK.N.CrawfordB.L. (2016). Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3502–3530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636064
12.
CoulterR. W.MairC.MillerE.BlosnichJ. R.MatthewsD. D.McCauleyH. L. (2017). Prevalence of past-year sexual assault victimization among undergraduate students: Exploring differences by and intersections of gender identity, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity. Prevention Science, 18(6), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0762-8
13.
CranneyS. (2015). The relationship between sexual victimization and year in school in U.S. Colleges: Investigating the parameters of the ‘red zone’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(17), 3133–3145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554425
14.
DaviesM.GilstonJ.RogersP. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281
15.
DworkinE. R. (2020). Risk for mental disorders associated with sexual assault: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(5), 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018813198
FedinaL.HolmesJ.BackesB. (2016). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000-2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129
18.
FeeneyH.ChiaramonteD.CampbellR.GreesonM. R.Fehler-CabralG. (2017). Anogenital and physical injuries in adolescent sexual assault patients: The role of victim–offender relationship, alcohol use, and memory impairment. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 13(2), 52–61. https://doi/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000148 https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000148
ForsmanR. L. (2017). Prevalence of sexual assault victimization among college men, aged 18–24: A review. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 14(6), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1369204
21.
GergerH.KellyH.BonnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
22.
GrossA. M.WinslettA.RobertsM.GohmC. L. (2006). An examination of sexual violence against college women. Violence Against Women, 12(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205277358
23.
HineB. A.MurphyA. D.ChurchyardJ. S. (2021). Development and validation of the male rape myth acceptance scale (MRMAS). Heliyon, 7(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07421
24.
HostlerM. J.O’NeilM. (2018). Reframing sexual violence: From #metoo to time’s up. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://doi.org/10.48558/2ZNA-GX62
25.
HuckJ. L.JamesS. (2020). Rape myth acceptance of students: The influence of social groups. Journal of American College Health, 70(1), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1742128
26.
HudspithL. F.WagerN.WillmottD.GallagherB. (2023). Forty years of rape myth acceptance interventions: A systematic review of what works in naturalistic institutional settings and how this can be applied to educational guidance for jurors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211050575
27.
JenkinsK. (2021). Rape myths: What are they and what can we do about them?Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 89, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246121000126
28.
JohnsonN. L.LippN. S.StoneH. K. (2023). Initial evaluation of a gender-inclusive version of the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 10(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000536
29.
KingL. L.RobertsJ. J. (2011). Traditional gender role and rape myth acceptance: From the countryside to the big city. Women & Criminal Justice, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2011.536045
30.
Lutz-ZoisC. J.MolerK. A.BrownM. J. (2015). Mechanisms for the relationship between traditional masculine ideologies and rape myth acceptance among college men. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(1), 84–101. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.996311 https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.996311
31.
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
32.
MelansonP. S. (1999). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Queen’s University.
MoylanC. A.JavorkaM. (2020). Widening the lens: An ecological review of campus sexual assault. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018756121
35.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. Journal of Sex Research, 54(4–5), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014
36.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
37.
PotterS.HowardR.MurphyS.MoynihanM. M. (2018). Long-term impacts of college sexual assaults on women survivors’ educational and career attainments. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1440574
38.
Rodino-ColocinoM. (2018). Me too, #metoo: Countering cruelty with empathy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(1), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1435083
39.
SchwendingerJ. R.SchwendingerH. (1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1(2), 18–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29765884
40.
SeñaA. C.HsuK. K.KelloggN.GirardetR.ChristianC. W.LindenJ.AmmerschlagM. R. (2015). Sexual assault and sexually transmitted infections in adults, adolescents, and children. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 61(8), 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ786
41.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290011
42.
TharpA. T.DeGueS.ValleL. A.BrookmeyerK. A.MassettiG. M.MatjaskoJ. L. (2013). A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012470031
43.
ThelanA.MeadowsE. (2021). The Illinois rape myth acceptance scale-subtle version: Using an adapted measure to understand the declining rates of rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20). 17807–17833. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211030013
UrbanR. E.Porras PylandC. (2021). Development and preliminary validation of the gender inclusive rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), 20630–20652. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211055076
46.
van BuurenSGroothuis-OudshoornK (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
47.
WalfieldS. M. (2018). ‘Men cannot be raped’: Correlates of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13-14), 6391–6417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518817777
48.
WrightJ.R. (2017). Gender bias in assessment: Rape myth acceptance and campus sexual assault. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
