A clear understanding of the knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, attitudes, and values of those whose behavior we hope to change is an essential task in a social marketing project. This formative research used mixed methods to identify consumer psychographics about high-fat milk among a low-income priority audience. High-fat milk users believe they choose the type of milk that is the healthiest for them and their families but had poor milk nutrition knowledge and an inaccurate appraisal of low-fat milk. Habit and taste preferences reinforced high-fat milk use but 2% milk users, a group that already adapted to reduced-fat milk, were the audience segment most willing to consider low-fat milk use. Low-fat milk use can be promoted by raising awareness that 2% milk is not low fat and addressing knowledge deficiencies while assuring the priority audience that 1% milk has all of the vitamins and minerals of whole or 2% milk but with less fat. The resonance of the promotion can be enhanced by incorporating words that “work” such as vitamins, minerals, healthy, choice, habit, and avoiding the words “switch” and “skim” that were viewed negatively by this low-income audience.
AggarwalA.MonsivaisP.DrewnowskiA. (2012). Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PloS One, 7, 1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037533
2.
AndreasenA. R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BestJ. (Ed.). (2001). Introduction: The diffusion of social problems. In How claims spread: Cross national diffusion of social problems (pp. 1–18). Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
4.
BrewerJ. L.BlakeA. J.RankinS. A.DouglassL. W. (1999). Theory of reasoned action predicts milk consumption in women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99, 39–44. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00012-7
BurnsT. J. (1999). Rhetoric as a framework for analyzing cultural constraint and change. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 19, 165–185.
7.
BusA. E.WorsleyA. (2002). Consumers’ sensory and nutritional perceptions of three types of milk. Public Health Nutrition, 6(2), 201–208. doi:10.1079/PHN2002417
8.
DavisC. G.DongD.BlayneyD.YenS. T.StillmanR. (2012). U.S. fluid milk demand: A disaggregated approach. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15, 25–40.
9.
DrewnowskiA. (2010). The nutrient rich foods index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 91, 1095S–1101S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D
10.
DrewnowskiA. (2011). The contribution of milk and milk products to micronutrient density and affordability of the U.S. diet. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 30, 422S–428S.
11.
DrewnowskiA.SpecterS. E. (2004). Poverty and obesity: The role of energy density and energy costs. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79, 6–16.
12.
FitzgibbonM.GansK. M.EvansW. D.ViswanathK.Johnson-TaylorW. L.Krebs-SmithS.…YarochA. L. (2007). Communicating healthy eating: Lesson learned and future directions. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, 39, S63–S71. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.017
13.
HuthP. J.FulgoniV. L.KeastD. R.ParkK.AuestadN. (2013). Major food sources of calories, added sugars, and saturated fat and their contribution to essential nutrient intakes in the U.S. diet: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003–2006). Nutrition Journal, 12, 1–10. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-12-116.
14.
JohnR.KerbyD. S.LandersP. S. (2004). A market segmentation approach to nutrition education among low-income individuals. Social Marketing Quarterly, 10, 24–38. doi:10.1080/15245000490903251
15.
KittB. K.CarrollM. D.OgdenC. L. (2011). Low-fat milk consumption among children and adolescents in the United States, 2007–2008. NCHS Data Brief, 75, 1–8. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db75.pdf
16.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2009). Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17.
LeeN. RKotlerP. (2016). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
LuntzF. (2007). Words that work: It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear (1st ed.). New York, NY: Hyperion.
19.
MaglioneC.BarnettJ.MaddockJ. E. (2005). Correlates of low-fat milk consumption in a multi-ethnic population. California Journal of Health Promotion, 3(4), 21–27.
20.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation measures (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
RehmC. D.DrewnowskiA.MonsivaisP. (2015). Potential population-level nutritional impact of replacing whole and reduced-fat milk with low-fat and skim milk among US children aged 2–19 years. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2014.11.001
22.
SteptoeA.PollardT. M.WardleJ. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25, 267–284.
TuorilaH. (1987). Selection of milks with varying fat contents and related overall liking, attitudes, norms and intentions. Appetite, 8, 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(87)80022-3
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2015). 2015–2020 Dietary guidelines for Americans. (8th ed.). Retrieved fromhttp://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/
29.
WechslerH.BaschC. E.ZybertP.LantiguaR.SheaS. (1995). The availability of low-fat milk in an inner-city Latino community: Implications for nutrition education. Public Health Briefs, 85, 1690–1692.
30.
WechslerH.WernickS. M. (1992). A social marketing campaign to promote low-fat milk consumption in an inner-city Latino community. Public Health Reports, 107(2), 202–207.
31.
WeinsteinN. D.SandmanP. M.BlalockS. J. (2008). The precaution adoption process model. In GlanzK.RimerB. K.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 123–145). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
