Identifying Perceived Barriers and Benefits to Reducing Energy Consumption in an Affordable Housing Complex

Abstract

Reduction of energy consumption in the affordable housing sector is highly impacted by human behavior. However, only limited behavior change research exists that is aimed at reducing energy consumption in this sector. This study seeks to implement the first two phases of the community-based social marketing (CBSM) framework in an affordable housing setting. The goals of the research are to identify the optimal behaviors for energy reduction and to identify the perceived barriers and benefits associated with those behaviors in a low-income housing facility. The results of this study identify five target behaviors along with their barriers and benefits. In addition, the study identifies potential issues and nuances in the CBSM process that researchers should take into consideration during future implementations of CBSM in affordable housing environments.

Keywords

affordable housing energy consumption behavior community-based social marketing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahamse

Steg

Vlek

Rothengatter

(2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.

Aloise-Young

P. A.

(2012). The importance of behavior plasticity for carbon savings. Invited talk to be given at the Climate, Mind and Behavior Symposium. Garrison, NY: Garrison Institute.

Bradshaw

J. L.

Bou-Zeid

Harris

R. H.

(2014). Comparing the effectiveness of weatherization treatments for low-income, American, urban housing stocks in different climates. Energy and Buildings, 69, 535–543.

Cheung

S. F.

Chan

D. K.-S.

Wong

Z. S.-Y.

(1999). Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and Behavior, 31, 587–612. doi:10.1177/00139169921972254

Chitnis

Sorrell

Druckman

Firth

S. K.

Jackson

(2014). Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups. Ecological Economics, 106, 12–32.

Costanzo

Archer

Aronson

Pettigrew

(1986). Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist, 41, 521–528. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.5.521

Energy Information Adminstration. (2011). Annual energy review: Table 2.1b Residential Sector Energy Consumption Estimates, 1949–2010.

Energy Information Adminstration. (2012). Average U.S. household using more consumer electronics. Residential Energy Consumption Survey. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/index.cfm

Faruqui

Sergici

Sharif

(2010). The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy, 35, 1598–1608.

10.

Flick

(2013). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. London, England: Sage.

11.

Gamtessa

S. F.

(2013). An explanation of residential energy-efficiency retrofit behavior in Canada. Energy and Buildings, 57, 155–164.

12.

Geller

E. S.

(1981). Evaluating energy conservation programs: Is verbal report enough?Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 331–335.

13.

Goldsmith

(2012, 64). Realizing the behavioral wedge—Getting tenants involved in saving energy. The Sallan Foundation. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sallan.org/Snapshot/2012/06/realizing_the_behavioral_wedge.php

14.

Hall

Romanach

Cook

Meikle

(2013). Increasing energy-saving actions in low income households to achieve sustainability. Sustainability, 5, 4561–4577.

15.

Hamilton

I. G.

Shipworth

Summerfield

A. J.

Steadman

Oreszczyn

Lowe

(2014). Uptake of energy efficiency interventions in English dwellings. Building Research & Information, 42, 255–275. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.867643

16.

Hargreaves

Nye

Burgess

(2010). Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, 38, 6111–6119.

17.

Harland

Staats

Wilke

H. A. M.

(1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505–2528. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x

18.

Heath

Gifford

(2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2154–2189. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x

19.

King

(1998). Template analysis. In Cassell

Symon

(Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 118–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Langevin

Gurian

P. L.

Wen

(2013). Reducing energy consumption in low income public housing: Interviewing residents about energy behaviors. Applied Energy, 102, 1358–1370.

21.

Lynne

G. D.

Franklin Casey

Hodges

Rahmani

(1995). Conservation technology adoption decisions and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 581–598. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(95)00031-6

22.

McKenzie-Mohr

(2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543–554.

23.

McKenzie-Mohr

(2011). Fostering sustainable behavior (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society.

24.

McMakin

A. H.

Malone

E. L.

Lundgren

R. E.

(2002). Motivating residents to conserve energy without financial incentives. Environment and Behavior, 34, 848–863. doi:10.1177/001391602237252

25.

Nevin

Rick

. 2010. Energy-efficient housing stimulus that pays foritself. Energy Policy, 38, 4–11.

26.

Nguyen

T. A.

Aiello

(2013). Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: A survey. Energy and buildings, 56, 244–257.

27.

Oberlin College. (n.d.). Retrieved February 24, 2016, fromhttp://new.oberlin.edu/office/environmental-sustainability/CBSM/more-on-cbsm.dot

28.

Olsen

M. E.

(1981). Consumers’ attitudes toward energy conservation. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 108–131.

29.

Romanach

Hall

Cook

(2014). Behaviour change and energy consumption: A case study on engaging and retaining participation of low-income individuals. Community Development Journal, 49, 541–556. doi:10.1093/cdj/bst056

30.

Ruel

M. T.

Garrett

J. L.

Hawkes

Cohen

M. J.

(2010). The food, fuel, and financial crises affect the urban and rural poor disproportionately: A review of the evidence. The Journal of Nutrition, 140, 170S–176S. doi:10.3945/jn.109.110791

31.

Santin

O. G.

Itard

Visscher

(2009). The effect of occupancy and building characteristics on energy use for space and water heating in Dutch residential stock. Energy and Buildings, 41, 1223–1232.

32.

Urban

Gomez

(2013, 826–28). A case for thermostat user models. In Wurtz

, Proceedings of the 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association (p. 1483). Chambéry, France: International Building Performance Simulation Association.

33.

Vigen

Mazur-Stommen

(2012). Reaching the “High-hanging fruit” through behavior change: How community-based social marketing puts energy savings within reach. An ACEEE white paper. Retrieved fromhttp://aceee.org/files/pdf/white-paper/high-hanging-fruit-cbsm.pdf.

34.

Yates

S. M.

Aronson

(1983). A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. American Psychologist, 38, 435.