This article applies a communication/persuasion model to examine what characteristics of students on a United States university campus are associated with drinking bottled water. Survey results show that those who drank more bottled water included non-Whites, those who trusted traditional organizations more and environmental organizations and scientists less, those who read the campus newspaper, and those who valued water safety, taste, and convenience more. Significant bivariate influences on more frequent bottled water drinking that did not persist in the hierarchical regression included conservatism, religiosity, Christian religion, nonindividualism, less interpersonal communication about environmental issues, less civic involvement, younger age, and fewer environmental behaviors. Groups working to reduce bottled water consumption on campuses should provide access to filtered water and emphasize the connection between bottled water and environmental issues, rather than health issues.
AndreasenA. R. (2006). Social marketing in the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AntillaL. (2005). Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 15, 338–352.
3.
AtkinC. K.FreimuthV. S. (2012). Guidelines for formative evaluation research in campaign design. In RiceR. E.AtkinC. K. (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 53–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BelfordT. A. (2008). Bottled water: Perceived scarcity and real necessity. Lambda Alpha Journal, 39, 38–46.
5.
BesleyJ.ShanahanJ. (2004). Skepticism about media effects concerning the environment: Examining Lomborg’s hypotheses. Society & Natural Resources, 17, 861–880.
6.
BielA.NilssonA. (2005). Religious values and environmental concern: Harmony and detachment. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 178–191.
7.
Center for Climate Change Communication. (2009). Global warming’s six Americas: An audience segmentation analysis. VA: George Mason University. Retrieved fromwww.climatechangecommunication.org
8.
CialdiniR. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
CroteauD.HoynesW. (2006). The business of media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
10.
CzajaR.BlairJ. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
11.
DoriaM. F. (2006). Bottled water versus tap water: Understanding consumers’ preferences. Journal of Water and Health, 04.2, 271–276.
12.
DoriaM. F. (2010). Factors influencing public perception of drinking water quality. Water Policy, 12, 1–19.
13.
DoriaM. F.PidgeonN.HunterP. R. (2009). Perceptions of drinking water quality and risk and its effect on behaviour: A cross-national study. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 5455–5464.
14.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013–1028.
15.
DupontD.AdamowiczW. L.KrupnickA. (2010). Differences in water consumption choices in Canada: The role of socio-demographics, experience, and perceptions of health risks. Journal of Water and Health, 8, 671–686.
16.
EckbergD. L.BlockerT. J. (1996). Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 343–355.
FearonJ. D. (1998). Deliberation as discussion. In ElsterJ. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 20–44). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GauchatG. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167–187.
22.
GleickP. H.CooleyH. S. (2009). Energy implications of bottled water. Environmental Research Letters, 4, 1–6.
23.
GorelickM. H.GouldL.NimmerM.WagnerD.HeathM.BashirH.BrousseauD. C. (2011). Perceptions about water and increased use of bottled water in minority children. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 165, 928–932.
24.
Government Accountability Office. (2009). Bottled water: FDA safety and consumer protections are often less stringent than comparable EPA protections for tap water. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromwww.gao.gov
25.
GoodJ. E. (2009). The cultivation, mainstreaming, and cognitive processing of environmentalists watching television. Environmental Communication, 3, 279–297.
26.
GrantR. (April 24, 2009). Drowning in plastic: The Great Pacific garbage patch is twice the size of France. The TelegraphRetrieved fromwww.telegraph.co.uk
27.
GriffinR. J.DunwoodyS. (2000). The relation of communication to risk judgment and preventative behavior related to lead in tap water. Health Communication, 12, 81–107.
28.
GuthJ. L.GreenJ. C.KellstedtL. A.SmidtC. E. (1995). Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 364–382.
29.
HobsonW. L.KnochelM. L.ByingtonC. L.YoungP. C.HoffC. J.BuchiK. F. (2007). Bottled, filtered, and tap water use in Latino and non-Latino children. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 161, 457–461.
30.
HornikxJ.O’KeefeD. J. (2009). Adapting consumer advertising appeals to cultural values: A meta-analytic review of effects on persuasiveness and ad liking. Communication Yearbook, 33, 38–70.
31.
Huerta-SaenzL.IrigoyenM.BenavidesJ.MendozaM. (2011). Tap or bottled water: Drinking preferences among urban minority children and adolescents. The Journal of Community Health, 37, 54–58.
32.
International Bottled Water Association. (2009). 2009 market report findings. Retrieved from bottledwater.org
33.
JonesA. Q.DeweyC. E.DoreK.MajowiczS. E.McEwenS. A.Waltner-ToewsD.HensonS. J.MathewsE. (2007). A qualitative exploration of the public perception of municipal drinking water. Water Policy, 9, 425–438.
34.
KemptonW.BosterJ. S.HartleyJ. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35.
KimY.ChoiS. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE [perceived consumer effectiveness]. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592–599.
36.
KreuterM. W.HaughtonL. T. (2006). Integrating culture into health information for African American women. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 794–811.
37.
LeeH.HubbardA. S. E.O’RiordanC. K.KimM.-S. (2006). Incorporating culture into the theory of planned behavior: Predicting smoking cessation intentions among college students. Asian Journal of Communication, 16, 315–322.
38.
LehmanP. K.GellerE. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior & Social Issues, 13, 13–32.
39.
MackeyE.DavisJ.BoulosL.BrownJ.CrozesG. (2005). Consumer perceptions of tap water, bottled water, and filtration devices. London, England: IWA Publishing.
40.
McCartyJ. A.ShrumL. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20, 93–104.
41.
McGuireW. J. (2012). McGuire’s classic input-output framework for constructing persuasive messages. In RiceR. E.AtkinC. K. (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 133–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
McKenzie-MohrD. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531–537.
43.
McKenzie-MohrD. (2010). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (4th ed.). Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
44.
National Association for PET Container Resources. (2010). 2010 Report on post consumer PET container recycling activity. Retrieved from plasticsrecycling.org
National Science Foundation. (2004). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. Science and engineering indicators 2004 (pp. 7.1–7.37). Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/start.htm
47.
O’GuinnT. C.ShrumL. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 278–294.
48.
OhkuraY. (2003). The roles and limitations of newspapers in environmental reporting. Case study: Isahaya Bay land reclamation project issue. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47, 237–246.
49.
O’DonnellC.RiceR. E. (2008). Coverage of environmental events in U.S. and U.K. newspapers: Frequency, hazard, specificity, and placement. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65, 637–654.
50.
OstmanR. E.ParkerJ. L. (1986). A public’s environmental informational sources and evaluations of mass media. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 9–17.
51.
RiceR. E.AtkinC. K. (Eds.) (2012). Public communication campaigns (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
RyanC.AlexanderS. (2006). “Reframing” the presentation of environmental law and policy. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 33, 563–592.
53.
SaylorA.ProkopyL. S.AmbergS. (2011). What’s wrong with the tap? Examining perceptions of tap water and bottled water at Purdue University. Environmental Management, 48, 588–601.
54.
SchultzP. W.ZeleznyL.DalrympleN. (2000). A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32, 576–591.
55.
ShanahanJ.McComasK. (1999). Nature stories: Depictions of the environment and their effects. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
56.
SherkatD.EllisonC. G. (2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 71–85.
57.
SkocpolT.FlorinaM. P. (1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In SkocpolT.FlorinaM. P. (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1–23). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
58.
SlaterM. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 267–283.
59.
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
60.
TakahashiB. (2009). Social marketing for the environment: An assessment of theory and practice. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 8, 135–145.
61.
ThompsonV. L. S.KalesanB.WellsA.WilliamsS. L.CaitoN. M. (2010). Comparing the use of evidence and culture in targeted colorectal cancer communication for African Americans. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, 22–33.
62.
TrumboC. W. (1996). Examining psychometrics and polarization in a single-risk case study. Risk Analysis, 16, 429–438.
63.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
64.
WardL. A.CainO. L.MullallyR. A.HollidayK. S.WernhamA. G. H.BaillieP. D.GreenfieldS. M. (2009). Health benefits about bottled water: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 9, 1–9.
65.
WeaverA. A. (2002). Determinants of environmental attitudes: A five-country comparison. International Journal of Sociology, 32, 77–108.
