Abstract
This case study of the Flint water crisis demonstrates the effects that can result from focusing on the task of improving the creditworthiness of a financially distressed municipality with infrastructure problems. Empirical findings, which incorporate an event study of the impacts on Flint's municipal bondholders, indicate that the creditors of a political subdivision administered by a State appointee may be helped through infliction of a humanitarian crisis while the costs are borne by the State itself and others. Novel forms of financing infrastructure investments are suggested to help resolve the trade-offs between government fiscal discipline and service to the governed people.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
