School district performance ratings are presented on intuitive grading scales. These ratings are widely publicized by local news outlets and can potentially influence voter behavior. Based on behavioral research applied to the local public finance context, we hypothesize that voters will anchor their votes in initial performance ratings even if the performance rating subsequently changes. This article investigates this hypothesis with a panel of all Texas school district bond referenda from 1998 to 2015. Estimates of probit models with careful consideration of selection bias provide support for our anchoring hypothesis. Evidence of anchoring votes, however, is nuanced and varies across two different Texas school district rating systems.
ArapisT., ReitanoV. and BruckE. (2017) “The Fiscal Savings Behavior of Pennsylvania School Districts Through the Great Recession”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 37(3):47–70.
2.
ArielyD., LoewensteinG., and PrelecD. (2003) “‘Coherenent Arbitrariness’: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118:73–105.
3.
BalsdonE., BrunnerE., and RuebenK. (2003) “Private Demands for Public Capital: Evidence from California School Bond Referenda”, Journal of Urban Economics, 54(3):610–638.
4.
BarroR.J. (1979) “On the Determination of the Public Debt”, Journal of Political Economy, 87(5):940–971.
5.
BowersA., and ChenJ. (2015) “Ask and ye shall receive? Automated Text Mining of Michigan Capital Facility Finance Bond Election Proposals to Identify Which Topics are Associated with Bond Passage and Voter Turnout”, Journal of Education Finance, 41(2):164–196.
6.
BowersA., and LeeJ. (2013) “Carried or Defeated? Examining the Factors Associated with Passing School District Bond Elections in Texas, 1997–2009”, Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5):732–767.
7.
BowersA., MetzgerS., and MilitelloM. (2010a) “Knowing the Odds: Parameters that Predict Passing or Failing School District Bonds”, Educational Policy, 24(2):398–420.
8.
BowersA., MetzgerS., and MilitelloM. (2010b) “Knowing What Matters: An Expanded Study of School Bond Elections in Michigan, 1998–2006”, Journal of Education Finance, 35(4):374–396.
BrunnerE.J., and BalsdonE. (2004). “Intergenerational Conflict and the Political Economy of School Spending”, Journal of Urban Economics, 56(2):369–388.
11.
BrunnerE. J. and RossS.L. (2010) “Is the Median Voter Decisive? Evidence from Referenda Voting Patterns”, Journal of Public Economics, 94(11–12):898–910.
12.
BrunnerE., RobbinsM., and SimonsenB. (2018) “Information, Tax salience, and Support for School Bond Referenda”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 38(4): 52–73.
13.
ButtonJ. W. (1992) “A Sign of Generational Conflict: The Impact of Florida's Aging Voters on Local School and Tax Referenda”, Social Science Quarterly, 73(4): 786–797.
14.
CaseyJ.P., and MuchaM.J. (2007) Capital Planning and Evaluation, Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
15.
ColburnC.B. and HorowitzJ.B. (2003) “Local Politics and the Demand for Public Education”, Urban Studies, 40(4):797–807.
16.
ConrodC. (2002). The Winning School Bond : A Citizen's Guide to a Successful School Bond Campaign, Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
17.
CramptonF., ThompsonD., and VesselyR. (2004) “The Forgotten Side of School Finance Equity: The Role of Infrastructure Funding in Student Success”, NASSP Bulletin, 88(640):29–52.
18.
CritcherC.R., and GilovichT. (2008) “Incidental Environmental Anchors”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21:241–251.
DavisL., and TysonB. (2003) “Strategic Bonding”, American School Board Journal, 190(7):34–36.
22.
DougalC., EngelbergJ., ParsonsC.A., and WesepE.D. (2015) “Anchoring on Credit Spreads”, The Journal of Finance, 70(3):1039–1080.
23.
FletcherD., and KennyL.W. (2008) “The Influence of the Elderly on School Spending in a Median Voter Framework”, Education Finance and Policy, 3(3):83–315.
GradsteinM., and KaganovicM. (2004) “Aging Populations and Education Finance”, Journal of Public Economics, 81(3):2469–2485.
28.
GreerR. A., and DenisonD.V. (2014) “Does Intrastate Competition in Segmented Municipal Bond Markets Affect Interest Costs? An Empirical Test of the Preferred Habitat Hypothesis”, Municipal Finance Journal, 35(2):1–15.
29.
GreerR. A. (2016). “Local government risk assessment: The effect of government type on credit rating decisions in Texas”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 36(2): 70–90.
30.
GrimmelikhuijsenS., JilkeS., OlsenA., and TummersL. (2016) “Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology”, Public Administration Review, 77(1):45–56.
31.
HoltC. R., WendtM.A., and SmithR.M. (2006). “School Bond Success: An Exploratory Case Study”, The Rural Educator, 27(2):11–17.
32.
HoltC.R. (2017) School Bond Success: A Strategy for Building America's Schools, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
33.
JacobsenR., SnyderJ., and SaultzA. (2014) “Informing or Shaping Public Opinion? The Influence of School Accountability Data Format on Public Perceptions of School Quality”, American Journal of Education, 121(1):1–27.
34.
JohnsonP.A., and IngleW.K. (2009) “Campaign Strategies and Voter Approval of School Referenda: A Mixed Methods Analysis”, Journal of School Public Relations, 30(1):51–71.
35.
KasdanD.O. (2018) “Toward a Behavioral Theory of Public Administration”, Inter-national Review of Administrative Sciences, OnlineFirst Access.
36.
KrizK. (2005) “Propsect Theory and the Municipal Bond Market”, in KahnA. and HildrethW.B. (eds) Financial Management Theory in the Public Sector, Santa Barbra: ABC-Clio.
LentzC. (1999) “Predicting School Referenda Outcomes: Answers from Illinois”, Journal of Education Finance, 24(4):459–82.
39.
LevittS.D., and ListJ.A. (2008). “Homo Economicus Evolve”, Science, 319:909–910.
40.
LiuG., and DenisonD.V. (2014). “Indirect and Direct Subsidies for Cost of Government Capital: Comparing Tax-Exempt Bonds and Build America Bonds”, National Tax Journal, 67(3):569–594.
41.
McCafferyE., and SlemrodJ.. (2006) Behavioral Public Finance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
MizeT. D. (2019) “Best Practices for Estimating, Interpreting, and Presenting Nonlinear Interaction Effects”, Sociological Science, 6:81–117.
National Center for Education Statistics (2019) Elementary/Secondary Information System, accessed July 15, 2020 (https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/elsi/).
45.
NelsonA.A. and BaluR. (2014) “Local Government Responses to Fiscal Stress: Evidence from the Public Sector”, Public Administration Review, 74(5):601–614.
46.
O'ConnellL., and YusufJ.E. (2011). “An Information Model to Present Proposals to Increase Taxes: Two Examples in the Context of American Values”, International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3):180–189.
47.
PieleP.K. and HallJ.S. (1973) Budgets, Bonds, and Ballots: Voting Behavior in School Financial Elections, Lexington: Lexington Books.
48.
RughJ.S. and TrounstineJ. (2011) “The Provision of Local Public Goods in Diverse Communities: Analyzing Municipal Bond Elections”, The Journal of Politics, 73(4):1038–1050.
49.
ShoberA.F. (2011) “Attracting Capital: Magnets, Charters, and School Referendum Success”, Journal of School Choice, 5(2):205–223.
50.
TedinK., MatlandR., and WeiherG. (2001) “Age, Race, Self-interest, and Financing public Schools Through Referenda”, Journal of Politics, 63(1):270–294.
TheobaldN.A. and MeierK.J (2002) “The Politics of School Finance: Passing School Bonds”, Paper presented at Midwest Political Science Political Science Association.
56.
ThompsonP.N. (2019) “Are School Officials Held Accountable for Fiscal Stress? Evidence from School District Financial Intervention Systems”, Economics of Education Review, 72:44–54.
57.
ThompsonP.N. and WhitleyJ. (2017) “The Effect of School District and Municipal Government Financial Health Information on Local Tax Election Outcomes: Evidence from Fiscal Stress Labels in Ohio”, Public Choice, 170(3):265–288.
58.
TummersL.G., OlsenA.L., JilkeS., and GrimmelikhuijsenS.G. (2016) “Introduction to the Virtual Issue on Behavioral Public Administration”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Virtual Issue 2016:1–3.
59.
TverskyA., and KahnemanD. (1974) “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”, Science, 184(4157):1124–1131.
60.
WirtF.M. and KirstM.W. (1997) The Political Dynamics of American Education, Berkley: McCutchan Publishing.
61.
ZimmerR., BuddinR., JonesJ., and LiuN. (2011) “What Types of School Capital Projects Are Voters Willing to Support?”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(1):37–55.
