Taxes on real property have been identified as a source of income whose potential is currently underused by many countries. Indonesia has recently decentralized the property tax to the local level, but has this led to a better use of the tax potential from this source? A look at revenue figures provided by the Indonesian Ministry of Finance suggests that reforms may have boosted tax collection at an aggregate level. However, closer scrutiny of seven local cases reveals that local governments are far from tapping the full potential of the property tax. Most of them are struggling with deficient data, low public acceptance of the tax and huge amounts of tax liabilities. in addition, local governments shy away from the political costs associated with more active revenue mobilization.
AhmadE., BrosioG., and PöschlC. (2014) “Local Property Taxation and Benefits in Developing Countries - Overcoming political resistance?” LSE Asia Research Centre Working Paper 65, London: LSE.
2.
AlmJ., BuschmanR. D., and SjoquistD. L. (2012) “Rethinking Local Government Reliance on the Property”, Tax Tulane Economics Working Paper Series 1215, New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.
3.
AsatryanZ., BaskaranT., and HeinemannF. (2014) “The Effect of Direct Democracy on the Level and Structure of Local Taxes”, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 14–003, Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
4.
AshworthJ., and HeyndelsB. (1997) “Politicians preferences on local tax rates: An empirical analysis”, European Journal of Political Economy, 13: 479–502.
5.
Asian Development Bank. (2009) Strategy and Roadmap for Devolving the Property Tax in Indonesia ADB – INO. TA 7010 – Preparing the Second Local Government Finance and Governance Reform Program, Jakarta: ADB.
6.
BesleyT., and PerssonT. (2014) “Why Do Developing Countries Tax So Little?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4):99–120.
7.
BirdR. M. (2013) “Taxation and Development: What Have We Learned from Fifty Years of Research?”, Public Finance and Management, 13(4):266–288.
8.
BirdR. M., and SlackE. (2004) International Handbook of Land and Property Taxation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers.
9.
BirdR. M., and SmartM. (2002) “Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries”, World Development, 30(6): 899–912.
10.
BoadwayR., and ShahA. (eds). (2007) Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: principles and practice, Washington, DC: World Bank.
11.
Bueno de MesquitaB., SmithA., SiversonR. M., and MorrowJ. D. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
BunellT., MillerM. A., PhelpsN. A., and TaylorJ. (2013) “Urban Development in a Decentralized Indonesia: Two Success Stories?”, Pacific Affairs, 86(4):857–876.
13.
CabralM., and HoxbyC. (2012) “The hated property tax: salience, tax rates, and tax revolts”, NBER Working Paper 18514, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
Di JohnJ., and PutzelJ. (2009) “Political Settlements: Issues paper”, GSDRC Emerging Issues Papers, Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
15.
Everest-PhillipsM. (2009) “When Do Elites Pay Taxes? Tax Morale and State-Building in Developing Countries”, Paper presented at the WIDER Conference on The Role of Elites in Economic Development, Helsinki, Finland: UNU WIDER.
16.
FjeldstadO.-H., and HeggstadK. (2012) “Local government revenue mobilisation in Anglophone Africa”, CMI Working Paper 2012:6, Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute / ICTD.
17.
GerringJ. (2006) “Techniques for Choosing Cases”, in SeawrightJ. (ed.), Case Study Research - Principles and Practices, pp. 86–150, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GillH. L., and HaurinD. R. (2001) “The choice of tax base by local authorities: voter preferences, special interest groups, and tax base diversification”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31:733–749.
19.
GordonR., and LiW. (2009) “Tax structures in developing countries: Many puzzles and a possible explanation”, Journal of Public Economics, 93(7–8): 855–866.
20.
HettichW., and WinerS. L. (1988) “Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure”, The American Economic Review, 78(4):701–712.
21.
HettichW., and WinerS. L. (1999) Democratic Choice and Taxation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HofmanB., and KaiserK. (2004) “The making of the ‘Big Bang’ and its aftermath: a political economy perspective”, in: AlmJ., Martinez-VazquezJ., and IndrawatiS. M. (eds) Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and the Rebuilding of Indonesia. The ‘Big Bang’ Program and its Economic Consequences, pp. 15–46, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23.
HorowitzD. L. (2013) Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia, New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
International Monetary Fund (2011) Revenue Mobilization in Developing Countries, Washington, DC: IMF (Fiscal Affairs Department).
25.
JaggerP., and ShivelyG. (2014) “Taxes and Bribes in Uganda”, The Journal of Development Studies, 51(1):66–79.
26.
JibaoS., and PrichardW. (2016) “Rebuilding Local Government Finances After Conflict: Lessons from a Property Tax Reform Programme in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone”, The Journal of Development Studies, 52(12):1759–1775.
27.
KellyR. (2004) “Property Tax Reform in Indonesia: Emerging Challenges from Decentralisation”, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 26(1): 71–90.
28.
KellyR. (2014) “Implementing sustainable property tax reform in developing countries”, in: BirdR. M. and Martinez-VazquezJ. (eds), Taxation and Development: The Weakest Link?, pp. 326–363, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29.
KellyR., GyatN., NordiawanD., and HarahapR. (2011) Indonesia: Local Government Finance and Governance Reform; Final Report: Property Tax Devolution Support, Jakarta: Asian Development Bank.
30.
KennyL. W., and WinerS. L. (2006) “Tax Systems in the World: An Empirical Investigation into the Importance of Tax Bases, Administration Costs, Scale and Political Regime”, International Tax and Public Finance, 13(2):181–215.
31.
KorteN., DutzlerB., and HallerbergM. (2013) Indonesia Country Report ITC Tax Mapping Asia. Bonn: International Tax Compact.
32.
LeT. M., Moreno-DodsonB., and RojchaichaninthornJ. (2008) “Expanding Taxable Capacity and Reaching Revenue Potential: Cross-Country Analysis”, Policy Research Working Paper 4559, Washington, DC: World Bank.
33.
LewisB. D. (2003) “Property tax in Indonesia: measuring and explaining administrative (under-) performance”, Public Administration and Development, 23(3):227–239.
34.
LewisB. D., and SmokeP. (2015) “Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers and Local Incentives and Responses: The Case of Indonesia”, Fiscal Studies, 2015(1):1–28.
35.
López-LabordaJ., and ZabalzaA. (2012) “Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: the Efficiency Effect of Taxes, Transfers and Fiscal, Illusion”, International Center for Public Policy Working Paper12–29. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.
36.
MakowskyM., and SandersS. (2013) “Political costs and fiscal benefits: The political economy of residential property value assessment under Proposition 2½”, Economics Letters, 120(3):359–363.
37.
McCullochN., and MaleskyE. (2010) Does better local governance improve district growth performance in Indonesia?, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
38.
MikesellJ. L. (2007) “Developing Options for the Administration of Local Taxes: An International Review”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(1):41–68.
39.
MonkamN., and MooreM. (2015) “How property tax would benefit Africa”, Counterpoints, London: Africa Research Institute.
40.
NorregaardJ. (2013) “Taxing Immovable Property Revenue Potential and Implementation Challenges”, IMF Working Paper 13/129, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
41.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014) Development Co-operation Report 2014: Mobilising Resources for Sustainable Development, Paris: OECD.
42.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015) Tax Administration 2015: Comparative nformation on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies, Paris: OECD.
43.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), African Development Bank (AfDB), and Economic Commission for Africa (ECA). (2010) African Economic Outlook 2010, Paris: OECD.
44.
PalS., and RoyJ. (2010) Fiscal Decentralization and Development: How Crucial is Local Politics?, Middlesex: Brunel University.
45.
PepinskyT. B., and WihardjaM. M. (2011) “Decentralization and Economic Performance in Indonesia”, Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(3):337–371.
46.
PessinoC., and FenochiettoR. (2010) “Determining countries' tax effort”, Hacienda Pública Española / Revista de Economía Pública, 195(4):65–87.
47.
PirachaM., and MooreM. (2016) “Revenue-Maximising or Revenue-Sacrificing Government? Property Tax in Pakistan”, The Journal of Development Studies, 52(12):1776–1790.
48.
PöschlC. (2015) “Revenue Pressure on Mexican Municipalities: Does it Lead to Greater Accountability?”, ICTD Working Paper 29, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
PresbiteroA. F., SacchiA., and ZazzaroA. (2014) “Property Tax and Fiscal Discipline in OECD Countries”, MoFiR Working Paper 95, Ancona, Italy: Money and Finance Research Group.
51.
PrichardW. (2014) “Electoral Competitiveness, Political Budget Cycles and Taxation in Developing Countries”, ICTD Working Paper 24, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
52.
RosengardJ. K. (2013) “The tax everyone loves to hate: principles of property tax reform”, in: McCluskeyW. J., CorniaG. C., and WaltersL. C. (eds), A Primer on Property Tax: Administration and Policy, pp. 173–186, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
53.
SeifertJ., and LiH. (2015) “Indonesia's fiscal decentralization and its effect on provincial public finances”, Public Finance and Management, 15(2):108–129.
54.
SekhonJ. S. (2008) “The Neyman-Rubin Model of Causal Inference and Estimation via Matching Methods”, in: Box-SteffensmeierJ. M., BradyH. E., and CollierD. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, pp. 271–299, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
SlackE. (2013) “The politics of the property tax” in: McCluskeyW. J., CorniaG. C., and WaltersL. C. (eds), A Primer on Property Tax: Administration and Policy, pp. 69–88, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
56.
SlackE., and BirdR. M. (2014) “The Political Economy of Property Tax Reform”, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism No. 18, Paris: OECD.
57.
SmokeP. (2013) “Why Theory and Practice are Different: The Gap Between Principles and Reality in Subnational Revenue Systems”, International Center for Public Policy Working Paper 13–13, Atlanta, GA: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
58.
SmokeP. (2015) “Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform”, Public Administration and Development, 35(2): 97–112.
59.
StotskyJ. G., and WoldeMariamA. (1997) “Tax Effort in Sub-Saharan Africa”, IMF Working Paper No. 97/107, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
60.
SumartoS., VothknechtM., and WijayaL. (2014) “Explaining the regional heterogeneity of poverty: Evidence from decentralized Indonesia”, SMERU Working Paper, Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.
61.
TirtosuhartoD. (2010) “The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization and State Allocative Efficiency on Regional Growth in Indonesia”, Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 1(2):287–307.
62.
TranchantJ.-P. (2008) “Fiscal decentralisation, institutional quality and ethnic conflict: A panel data analysis, 1985–2001”, Conflict, Security & Development, 8(4): 491–514.
63.
United Nations. (2015) Outcome document of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development: Addis Ababa Action Agenda, New York, NY: United Nations.
64.
von HaldenwangC., ElfertA., EngelmannT., GermainS., SahlerG., and Stanzel FerreiraA. (2015) The Devolution of the Land and Building Tax in Indonesia, Bonn: DIE.
65.
von HaldenwangC., von SchillerA., and GarciaM. (2014) “Tax Collection in Developing Countries – New Evidence on Semi-Autonomous Revenue Agencies (SARAs)”, Journal of Development Studies, 50(4):541–555.
66.
von LuebkeC. (2009) “The political economy of local governance: findings from an Indonesian field study”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(2):201–230.
67.
von SchillerA. (2016) “Business Organisations, Party Systems and Tax Composition in Developing Countries: A Comparison between Colombia and Peru”, The Journal of Development Studies, 52(12):1722–1743.
68.
WaltersL. C. (2013) “Estimating property tax revenue potential”, in: McCluskeyW. J., CorniaG. C., and WaltersL. C. (eds), A Primer on Property Tax: Administration and Policy, pp. 229–247, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
69.
WeingastB. R. (2009) “Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: The implications of Fiscal Incentives”, Journal of Urban Economics, 65:279–293.
70.
WeingastB. R. (2014) “Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Political Aspects of Decentralization and Economic Development”, World Development, 53:14–25.
