In the context of a widespread focus on decentralization in Africa, there exists an imperative to find suitable ways to maximize potential own revenue sources at all sub-national government levels. This need in particular and the need for greater domestic resource mobilization by African states in general, has been exacerbated by the current global financial crisis that has led many countries into recession and left developed and developing countries alike scrambling to find solutions at home. In that regard, it has been widely suggested that property taxes would represent an important, if not the best, source of stable revenue at the sub-national level in both developed and developing countries. This paper analyses property tax systems as practiced in some francophone African countries, by identifying major issues and constraints they face; it also explores avenues to strengthen property tax as a source of national and/or municipal revenue.
AlmJames “Tax Compliance and Administration.” Handbook on Taxation. Ed. HildrethW. B.and RichardsonJ.A.New York: Marcel Dekker, 2000. 741–68.
2.
BahlRoy, and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez. Sequencing Fiscal Decentralization. Working paper no.3914. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2006.
3.
BahlRoy, Martinez-VazquezJorge, and YoungmanJoan, eds. Making the Property Tax Work, Experiences in Developing and Transitional Countries. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008.
4.
BahlRoy W.Implementation Rules for Fiscal Decentralization. Rep. Atlanta: International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, 1999.
BellMichael, and ConnollyKatrina. “Financing Urban Government in Transition Countries: Assessment Uniformity and the Property Tax.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28.6 (2010): 978–91.
7.
BirdRichard W., and SlackEnid, eds. International Handbook of Land and Property Taxation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.
8.
BruceJohn W., FreudenbergerMark S., and NgaidoTidiane. “Old Wine in New Bottles.” Land Tenure in Development Cooperation. GTZ: Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Technische Zusammenarbeit, 1998. Web. 31 Mar. 2011. <http://www.mekonginfo.org/mrc/html/bruce/bru_inh.htm>.
9.
BruceJohn W.1998. Country Profiles of Land Tenure: Africa, 1996, Research Paper No 130. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Land Tenure Center. Bruce, Neil. Public Finance and the American Economy (2nd Edition). Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman, 2001.
10.
ChekaCosmas “The State of the Process of Decentralization in Cameroon.” Africa DevelopmentXXXII. 2 (2007): 181–96.
11.
Durand-LasserveAlain, and NdiayeSelle. The Social and Economic Impact of Land Titling Programmes in Dakar, Senegal. Main Findings of the Socioeconomic Survey in Five Settlements in Dakar and Pikine. Rep. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), Government of Norway, 2008.
12.
FranzsenRiël C.D., and MonkamNara F. “Property Taxation in Africa: A Status Report.” Proc. of 10th Real Estate Conference, African Real Estate Society (AfRES), Naivasha, Kenya. 2010.
13.
FranzsenRiël C.D. “Tax Base Coverage and Property Data.” 2008 Fiscal Decentralization and Sub-National Government Finance Program.University of Pretoria, RSA, Pretoria. Sept. 2008a.
14.
FranzsenRiël C.D. “Basic Features of a Comprehensive Property Tax System.” 2008 Fiscal Decentralization and Sub-National Government Finance Program.University of Pretoria, RSA, Pretoria. Sept. 2008b.
15.
FranzsenRiël C.D.Property Taxation in Anglophone Africa. Rep. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Land Lines, 2007.
16.
HassaneBoubacar. Property Taxation in Francophone Africa 4: Case Study of Niger. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAD1. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
17.
KellyRoy “Designing a Property Tax Reform Strategy for Sub-Saharan Africa: An Analytical Framework Applied to Kenya.” Public Budgeting and Finance20.4 (2000): 36–51.
18.
LambertVickiTowards a Better Understanding of Property Taxes. Rep. Atlanta, USA: State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Revenue, 2008.
19.
McCluskeyWilliam J., and BellMichael E.Rental Value versus Capital Value: Alternative Bases for the Property Tax. Proc. of What Role for Property Taxes?, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Program, Georgia State University and The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Program, Georgia State University, Apr. 2008. Web. Apr. 2011. <http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ISP_CONFERENCES_PROPERTY_TAX_2008_Bell_McCluskey_PAPER.pdf>.
20.
McCluskeyWilliam J., ConnellanOwen P., and PlimmerFrancis A. S. “Property Tax Banding: A Solution for Developing Countries.” Assessment Journal9.2 (2002): 37–47.
21.
MonkamNara F.Property Taxation in Francophone Africa 1: Case Study of Gabon. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAA2.), Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009a.
22.
MonkamNara F.Property Taxation in Francophone Africa 1: Case Study of Senegal. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAA3. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009b.
23.
MonkamNara F.Property Taxation in Francophone Africa 1: Regional Overview. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAA1. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
24.
MouCharlesMajor Property Tax Issues in Africa. Property Tax in Eastern and Southern Africa: Challenges and Lessons Learned. Working paper no. 2. Vol. 2. Harare, Zimbabwe: Municipal Development Programme, 1996.
25.
NzewangaJean Jacques. Francophone Africa 3: Appendix 3: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAB8. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
26.
NzewangaJean Jacques. Francophone Africa 3 Appendix 5: Rwanda. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAB10. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
27.
NzewangaJean JacquesProperty Taxation in Francophone Africa 3: Case Study of Democratic Madagascar. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAB4. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
28.
RaoVasanth U. A. “Is Area-Based Assessment and Alternative, and Step Intermediate, or an Impediment to Value-Based Taxation in India?” Making the Property Tax Work: Experiences in Developing and Transitional Countries. Ed. BahlRoy W., Martinez-VazquezJorge, and YoungmanJoan M.Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008, 241–67.
TayohBernardFrancophone Africa 2: Case Study of Cameroon. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAC2. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
31.
TayohBernardFrancophone Africa 2: Case Study of Côte d'Ivoire. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAC4. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
32.
TayohBernardFrancophone Africa 2: Case Study of the Central African Republic. Working paper. Vol. WP09FAC3. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2009.
