Leaders and members of virtual teams do not always have the opportunity to seek training and development to overcome the challenges of being culturally and geographically distant, nor the serendipitous exchanges afforded by proximity to work associates who might provide mentoring for personal or professional guidance. How then might organizations and human resource development (HRD) professionals foster relationships that are supportive in nature, considered critical for many outcomes associated with individual and leadership development and virtual team success?
The Solution
Drawing on the theoretical perspective that communication is constitutive of social, psychological and organizational realities, a conceptual model was developed through an interpretive study. The model highlights how informal developmental relationships emerge, what type of communication constitutes these relationships, and the impact they have on leaders and members of virtual work teams.
The Stakeholders
The results of this study have implications for leaders and members who work virtually and for HRD professionals seeking strategies to create and improve informal developmental relationships through the medium of virtual work team communication. Opportunities exist for researchers to explore the effectiveness and outcomes of building developmental relationships in virtual contexts.
AlbrechtT. L.HallB. (1991). Facilitating talk about new ideas: The role of personal relationships in organizational innovation. Communication Monographs, 59, 273-288.
2.
AllenT. D.DayR.LentzE. (2005). The role of interpersonal comfort in mentoring relationships. Journal of Career Development, 31, 155-169. doi:10.1177/089484530503100301
3.
AllenT. D.EbyL. T. (2003). Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated with learning and quality. Journal of Management, 29, 469-486. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00021-7
4.
AllenT. D.McManusS. E.RussellJ. E. A. (1999). Newcomer socialization and stress: Formal peer relationships as a source of support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 453-470. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1674
5.
BaxterL. A.BridgeK. (1992). Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communications, 56, 200-225.
6.
BeattieR. S.KimS.HagenM. S.EganT. M.EllingerA. D.HamlinR. G. (2014). Managerial coaching: A review of the empirical literature and development of a model to guide future practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16, 184-201. doi:10.1177/1523422313520476
7.
Bhalla HartR. K. (2002). The conversation of relationships: The communication content and quality of strong and weak relationships in geographically dispersed teams. ProQuest: UMI Dissertations Publishing.
8.
Bhalla HartR. K.McLeodP. L. (2003). Rethinking team building in geographically dispersed teams: One message at a time. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 352-361.
9.
BieremaL. L. (1999). Invited reaction: Setting the stage for further study of developmental relationships. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 221-224. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920100303
10.
BieremaL. L.MerriamS. B. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 211-227. doi:10.1023/A:1017921023103
11.
BowenD. D. (1986). The role of identification in mentoring female protégés. Group & Organization Studies, 11, 61-74.
12.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
BryantS. E.TerborgJ. R. (2008). Impact of peer mentor training on creating and sharing organizational knowledge. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2011-29.
14.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
ChellE. (2004). Critical incident technique. In CassellC.SymonG. (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 45-60). London, England: SAGE.
16.
ColbertA.BonoJ.PurvanovaR. (2015). Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Academy of Management Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0506
17.
CollinsP. M. (1994). Does mentorship among social workers make a difference? An empirical investigation of career outcomes. Social Work, 39, 413-419.
18.
CottonR. D.ShenY. (2013). The company you keep: The relational models and support expectations of key developer relationships. Career Development International, 18, 328-356. doi:10.1108/CDI-09-2012-0093
19.
DreherG. F.AshR. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 539-546.
20.
EbyL. T.RhodesJ.AllenT. D. (2007). Definition and evolution of mentoring. In AllenT. D.EbyL. T. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 7-20). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
21.
EnsherE. A.HeunC.BlanchardA. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 264-288.
22.
FaganM. M.WalterG. (1982). Mentoring among teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 113-118.
23.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-335.
24.
GermainM.McGuireD. (2014). The role of swift trust in virtual teams and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16, 356-370. doi:10.1177/1523422314532097
25.
GibsonS. K. (2005). Whose best interests are served? The distinction between mentoring and support. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 470-488. doi:10.1177/1523422305279678
26.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
27.
GongR.ChenS.YangM. (2014). Career outcome of employees: The mediating effect of mentoring. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 487-501.
28.
HaggardD. L.DoughertyT. W.TurbanD. B.WilbanksJ. E. (2011). Who is a mentor? A review of evolving definitions and implications for research. Journal of Management, 37, 280-304. doi:10.1177/0149206310386227
29.
HambleyL. A.O’NeillT. A.KlineT. J. (2007). Virtual team leadership: Perspectives from the field. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 3(1), 40-64. doi:10.4018/jec.2007010103
30.
HarveyM.McIntyreN.Thompson HeamesJ.MoellerM. (2009). Mentoring global female managers in the global marketplace: Traditional, reverse, and reciprocal mentoring. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1344-1361. doi:10.1080/09585190902909863
31.
HendersonM. A.ArgyleM. (1985). Social support by four categories of work colleagues: Relationships between activities, stress and satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 6, 229-239.
32.
HigginsM. C. (2000). The more, the merrier? Multiple developmental relationships and work satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 19, 277-296. doi:10.1108/02621710010322634
33.
HigginsM. C.DobrowS. R.RoloffK. S. (2010). Optimism and the boundaryless career: The role of developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 749-769.
34.
HigginsM. C.ThomasD. A. (2001). Constellations and careers: Toward understanding the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 223-247. doi:10.1002/job.66
35.
HixenbaughP.DewartH.DreesD.WilliamsD. (2006). Peer e-mentoring: Enhancement of the first year experience. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 5(1), 8-14.
36.
HüffmeierJ.HertelG. (2011). Many cheers make light the work: How social support triggers process gains in teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 185-204.
37.
IbrahimE.DickieC. (2010). A conceptual model of the human resource climate dimensions that influence the development of workplace relationships. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 18(2), 47-60.
38.
JarvenpaaS.KnollK.LeidnerD. (1998). Is anybody out there? The development and implications of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29-64.
39.
KahnW. A. (1998). Relational systems at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 39-76.
40.
KennedyF.CarrollB.FrancoeurJ. (2013). Mindset not skill set: Evaluating in new paradigms of leadership development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15, 10-26. doi:10.1177/1523422312466835
41.
KoehneB.ShihP. C.OlsonJ. S. (2012, February). Remote and alone: Coping with being the remote member on the team. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1257-1266). New York, NY: Association for Computer Machinery (ACM).
42.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
43.
LevinsonD. J.DarrowD.KleinE.LevinsonM.McKeeB. (1978). Seasons of a man’s life. New York, NY: Knopf.
44.
MadlockP. E.Booth-ButterfieldM. (2012). The influence of relational maintenance strategies among coworkers. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 21-47.
45.
MaoH. Y.HsiehA. T.ChenC. Y. (2012). The relationship between workplace friendship and perceived job significance. Journal of Management & Organization, 18, 247-262.
46.
MartinsL. L.GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
47.
McCallumS.O’ConnellD. (2009). Social capital and leadership development: Building stronger leadership through enhanced relational skills. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30, 152-166. doi:10.1108/01437730910935756
48.
McDaugallM.BeattieR. S. (1997). Peer mentoring at work: The nature and outcomes of non-hierarchical developmental relationships. Management Learning, 28, 423-437. doi:10.1177/1350507697284003
49.
McGuireG. M. (2007). Intimate work: A typology of the social support that workers provide to their network members. Work and Occupations, 34, 125-147. doi:10.1177/0730888406297313
50.
MethotJ. R.LePineJ. A.PodsakoffN. P.ChristianJ. S. (2015). Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personnel Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/peps.12109
51.
MeyersonD.WeickK. E.KramerR. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
MukherjeeD.LahiriS.MukherjeeD.BillingT. K. (2012). Leading virtual teams: How do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter?Management Decision, 50, 273-290. doi:10.1108/00251741211203560
53.
MurphyW. M.KramK. E. (2010). Understanding non-work relationships in developmental networks. Career Development International, 15, 637-663. doi:10.1108/13620431011094069
54.
NgT. W.SorensenK. L. (2008). Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Management, 33, 243-268. doi:10.1177/1059601107313307
55.
PhilippartN.GluesingJ. (2012, March). Global e-mentoring: Overcoming virtual distance for an effective partnership. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Intercultural Collaboration (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: Association for Computer Machinery (ACM).
56.
PowellA.PiccoliG.IvesB. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6-36.
57.
RaabeB.BeehrT. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271-293. doi:10.1002/job.193
58.
RaginsB. R.CottonJ. L. (1993). Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations. Journal of Management, 19, 97-111. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(93)90047-Q
59.
RaginsB. R.CottonJ. L.MillerJ. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1177-1194.
60.
RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (2007). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
RodriguezA.RodriguezY. (2015). Metaphors for today’s leadership: VUCA world, millennial and “cloud leaders.”Journal of Management Development, 34, 854-866. doi:10.1108/JMD-09-2013-0110
62.
SarkerS.LauF.SahayS. (2000). Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. ACM SIGMIS Database, 32(1), 38-56.
63.
ScottJ. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22, 109-127.
64.
SemmerN. K.ElferingA.JacobshagenN.PerrotT.BeehrT. A.BoosN. (2008). The emotional meaning of instrumental social support. International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 235-251.
65.
ShenY.KramK. E. (2011). Expatriates’ developmental networks: Network diversity, base, and support functions. Career Development International, 16, 528-552. doi:10.1108/13620431111178317
66.
SingleP. B.SingleR. M. (2005). E-mentoring for social equity: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13, 301-320. doi:10.1080/13611260500107481
67.
Smith-JentschK. A.ScielzoS. A.YarbroughC. S.RosopaP. J. (2008). A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 193-206.
68.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
70.
TjosvoldD.ChiaL. C. (1989). Conflict between managers and workers: The role of cooperation and competition. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 235-247.
71.
UrquhartC. (2007). The evolving nature of grounded theory method: The case of the information systems discipline. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (339-359). London, England: SAGE.
72.
VanderVoortL.DuckS. W. (2000). Talking about “relationships”: Variations on a theme. In DindiaK.DuckS. W. (Eds.), Communication and personal relationships (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: John Wiley.
73.
van EmmerikI. J. H. (2008). It is not only mentoring: The combined influences of individual-level and team-level support on job performance. Career Development International, 13, 575-593. doi:10.1108/13620430810911065
74.
WhitfordT.MossS. A. (2009). Transformational leadership in distributed work groups: The moderating role of follower regulatory focus and goal orientation. Communication Research, 36, 810-837. doi:10.1177/0093650209346800
75.
WorkmanM. (2007). The effects from technology-mediated interaction and openness in virtual team performance measures. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 355-365. doi:10.1080/01449290500402809
76.
YoungA. M.PerrewéP. L. (2000). The exchange relationship between mentors and protégés: The development of a framework. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 177-209.
77.
ZornT. E. (1995). Bosses and buddies: Constructing and performing simultaneous hierarchical and close friendship relationships. In DuckS.WoodJ. T. (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 122-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
