The second year of college is a time when students remain at increased risk of departure. Compared to widely available first-year resources, institutional support for second-year students is more limited. The purpose of this study was to compare second-to-third year retention between students who participated in a comprehensive second-year experience program (SEP; n = 2,622) with students who did not participate (n = 4,823). Because students’ participation in SEP was optional, we used propensity score matching to account for potential selection bias. Students who participated in SEP were retained at higher rates than students who did not participate, even when accounting for potential selection bias. Retention differences were especially notable among participants and nonparticipants from systemically minoritized backgrounds. These findings extend prior research that meaningful involvement in high-impact practices supports second-year students’ retention. We conclude with implications for leaders responsible for second-year programing on their campus.
ACPA, ACUHO-I, ACUI, NACA, NACADA, NASPA, & NIRSA (2006). Learning reconsidered 2: Implementing a campus-wide focus on the student experience.
2.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED431363.pdf
3.
AustinP. C. (2014). A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Statistics in Medicine, 33(6), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6004
4.
BanksT.DohyJ. (2019). Mitigating barriers to persistence: A review of efforts to improve retention and graduation rates for students of color in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p118
5.
BrownellJ. E.SwanerL. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Association of American Colleges & Universities.
6.
CaliendoM.KopeinigS. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
7.
CapikD.ShuppM. (2023). Addressing the sophomore slump: First-generation college students’ completion of year two of study in a rural bachelor’s degree granting college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 25(3), 632–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251211014868
CrispG.TaggartA.NoraA. (2015). Undergraduate Latina/o students: A systematic review of research identifying factors contributing to academic success outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551064
10.
DehejiaR. H.WahbaS. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982
11.
FinleyA.McNairT. (2013). Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high-impact practices. Association of American College and Universities. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582014.pdf
12.
GahaganJ. (2018). Institutional policies that impact sophomore success. New Directions for Higher Education, 2018(183), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20295
13.
GardnerJ. N.PattengaleJ.SchreinerL. A. (2000). The sophomore year: Summary and recommendations. In SchreinerL. A.PattengaleJ. (Eds.), Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed (pp. 89–93). Monograph No. 31. National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, University of South Carolina.
14.
GardnerP. D. (2000). From drift to engagement: Finding purpose and making career connections in the sophomore year. In SchreinerL. A.PattengaleJ. (Eds.), Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed (pp. 67–77). Monograph No. 31. National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, University of South Carolina.
15.
GarriottP. O.NisleS. (2018). Stress, coping, and perceived academic goal progress in first-generation college students: The role of institutional supports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000068
16.
GohnL.SwartzJ.DonnellyS. (2001). A case study of second year persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 2(4), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2190/K8CQ-FF2A-L9UP-M7AL
17.
GreenfieldG. M.KeupJ. R.GardnerJ. N. (2013). Developing and sustaining successful first-year programs. Wiley.
18.
GuiffridaD. A.DouthitK. Z. (2010). The Black student experience at predominantly White colleges: Implications for school and college counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00027.x
19.
HagedornL. S. (2005). How to define retention: A new look at an old problem. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention (pp. 89–105). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
20.
HarperS. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1S), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0047
21.
HunnV. (2014). African American students, retention, and team-based learning: A review of the literature and recommendations for retention at predominately White institutions. Journal of Black Studies, 45(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934714529594
22.
HunterM. S.TobolowskyB. F.GarnderJ. N.EvenbeckS. E.PattengaleJ. A.SchallerM. A.SchreinerL. A.(Eds.). (2010). Helping sophomores succeed: Understanding and improving the second-year experience. Jossey-Bass.
23.
IshitaniT. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 861–885. https://doi.org.10.1353/jhe.2006.0042
24.
IshitaniT. T. (2016). Time-varying effects of academic and social integration on student persistence for first and second years in college: National data approach. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115622781
25.
Jenkins-GuarnieriM. A.HorneM. M.WallisA. L.RingsJ. A.VaughanA. L. (2015). Quantitative evaluation of a first year seminar program: Relationships to persistence and academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 16(4), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.16.4.f
26.
JuilleratS. (2000). Assessing the expectations and satisfaction levels of sophomores: How are they unique? In SchreinerL. A.PattengaleJ. (Eds.), Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed (pp. 19–29). Monograph No. 31. National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, University of South Carolina.
27.
JuryM.SmedingA.StephensN. M.NelsonJ. E.AeleneiC.DarnonC. (2017). The experience of low-SES students in higher education: Psychological barriers to success and interventions to reduce social-class inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12202
28.
KennedyK.UpcraftM. L. (2010). Keys to student success: A look at the literature. In HunterM. S.TobolowskyB. F.GardnerJ. N.EvenbeckS. E.PattengaleJ. A.SchallerM. A.SchreinerL. A. (Eds.), Helping sophomores succeed: Understanding and improving the second-year experience (pp. 30–42). Jossey-Bass.
29.
KerbyM. B. (2015). Toward a new predictive model of student retention in higher education: An application of classical sociological theory. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 17(2), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115578229
30.
KilgoC. A.Ezell SheetsJ. K.PascarellaE. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
31.
KranzowJ.FooteS. M. (2018). Engaging sophomores through curricular and cocurricular initiatives. New Directions for Higher Education, 2018(183), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20294
32.
KranzowJ.FooteS. M.HinkleS. E. (2015). Supporting the transition of sophomores, transfers, and seniors: Opportunities for residence life professionals. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 42(1), 212–233. https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/acuho/journal_vol41no2/index.php#/p/212
33.
KuhG. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges & Universities.
34.
KuhG. D.O’DonnellK. (2013). Ensuring quality & taking high-impact practices to scale. American Association of Colleges & Universities.
LillisM. P. (2011). Faculty emotional intelligence and student-faculty interactions: Implications for student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.2.b
NelsonD. D. (2018). The invisible students: Service excellence in the second year. New Directions for Higher Education, 2018(183), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20291
41.
NobleK.FlynnN. T.LeeJ. D.HiltonD. (2007). Predicting successful college experiences: Evidence from a first year retention program. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.2190/6841-42JX-X170-8177
42.
O’KeeffeP. (2013). A sense of belonging: Improving student retention. College Student Journal, 47(4), 605–613.
43.
PrattI. S.HarwoodH. B.CavazosJ. T.DitzfeldC. P. (2019). Should I stay or should I go? Retention in first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117690868
44.
ProvencherA.KasselR. (2019). High-impact practices and sophomore retention: Examining the effects of selection bias. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117697728
45.
RendónL. I.JalomoR. E.NoraA. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In BraxtonJ. M. (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127–156). Vanderbilt University Press.
46.
ReyesM. E. (2011). A sophomore-to-junior mentoring program that works: The SAM program at the University of Texas Pan American. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.3.f
47.
RiberaA. K.MillerA. L.DumfordA. D. (2017). Sense of peer belonging and institutional acceptance in the first year: The role of high-impact practices. Journal of College Student Development, 58(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0042
48.
SchallerM. (2005). Wandering and wondering: Traversing the uneven terrain of the second year of college. About Campus, 10(4), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.131
49.
SchallerM. A. (2010). Understanding the impact of the second year of college. In HunterM. S.TobolowskyB. F.GardnerJ. N.EvenbeckS. E.PattengaleJ. A.SchallerM. A.SchreinerL. A. (Eds.), Helping sophomores succeed: Understanding and improving the second year experience (pp. 13–29). Jossey-Bass.
50.
SchallerM. A. (2018). Intentional design of the college sophomore year. New Directions for Higher Education, 2018(183), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20290
51.
SchreinerL. A.PattengaleJ. (2000). Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed. Monograph No. 31. National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, University of South Carolina.
52.
SheardM.GolbyJ. (2007). Hardiness and undergraduate academic study: The moderating role of commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.006
53.
SterlingA. J. (2018). Student experiences in the second year: Advancing strategies for success beyond the first year of college. Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly, 5(4), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sem3.20113
54.
StockenbergJ. (2007). The “sophomore jump” program at Colorado College. In TobolowskyB. F.CoxB. E. (Eds.), Shedding light on sophomores: An exploration of the second college year (pp. 63–74). University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition.
55.
TetleyJ.TobolowskyB. F.ChanE. K. (2010). Designing and implementing new initiatives for sophomores. In HunterM. S.TobolowskyB. F.GardnerJ. N.EvenbeckS. F.PattengaleJ. A.SchallerM. A.SchreinerL. A. (Eds.), Helping sophomores succeed: Understanding and improving the second-year experience (pp. 217–233). Jossey-Bass.
56.
ThomasD. T.WalshE. T.TorrB. M.AlvarezA. S.MalagonM. C. (2021). Incorporating high-impact practices for retention: A learning community model for transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(2), 243–263.https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118813618
57.
TobolowskyB. (2008). Sophomores in transition: The forgotten year. New Directions for Higher Education, 144, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.326
58.
TobolowskyB. F.CoxB. E. (2007). Learning from the best: Recommendations for sophomore initiatives. In TobolowskyB. F. & CoxB. E. (Eds.), Shedding light on sophomores: An exploration of the second college year (pp. 95–99). National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition.
59.
TorresV.HernandezE. (2009). Influence of an identified advisor/mentor on urban Latino students’ college experience. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 11(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.11.1.h
60.
TukibayevaM.GonyeaR. M. (2014). High-impact practices and the first-year student. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(160), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20059
61.
WilburT. G.RoscignoV. J. (2016). First-generation disadvantage and college enrollment/completion. Socius, 2, 2378023116664351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116664351
62.
WillcoxsonL.CotterJ.JoyS. (2011). Beyond the first–year experience: The impact on attrition of student experiences throughout undergraduate degree studies in six diverse universities. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903581533
63.
XuY. J.WebberK. L. (2018). College student retention on a racially diverse campus: A theoretically guided reality check. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116643325
64.
YoungD. G.SchreinerL. A.McintoshE. J. (2015). Investigating sophomore student success: The national survey of sophomore-year initiatives and the sophomore experiences survey, 2014. National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition. https://www.nrcpubs.com/p/130/investigating-sophomore-student-success-the-national-survey-of-sophomoreyear- initiatives-and-the-sophomore-experiences-survey-2014
