High-Impact Practices and Sophomore Retention: Examining the Effects of Selection Bias

Abstract

Institutions of higher education increasingly have adopted high-impact practices (HIPs) as a means to increase student retention and engagement. Yet, the growth and assessment of these practices have primarily focused on a student’s first and final years, which can contribute to a second-year slump. Administrative data from a small, 4-year liberal arts college are analyzed to investigate when students participate in HIPs and whether this timing affects first and second year retention decisions. Propensity score matching is used to control for selection in which students participate in HIPs. Consistent with previous research, results suggest that HIP participation is a significant predictor of both first and second year retention, though the effect of HIP participation is overestimated without properly controlling for selection bias. Results suggest that strategic incorporation of HIPs in the second year may improve retention outcomes.

Keywords

high-impact practices student retention sophomores

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrade

(2007) Learning communities: Examining positive outcomes. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice 9(1): 1–20.

Astin

(1993) What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Astin

A. W.

Oseguera

(2005) Degree attainment rates at American colleges and universities: Revised edition, Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA.

Bellani, R. (2007). Sophomore men: Their growth, relationships and search for life direction at Colgate University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Black

E. L.

(2014) Engaging beyond the first college year: Exploring the needs of second-year students. Communications in Information Literacy 8(2): 170–179.

Brownell

Swaner

(2009) High-impact practices: Applying the learning outcomes literature to the development of successful campus programs. Peer Review 11(2): 26–30.

Clark

M. H.

Cundiff

N. L.

(2011) Assessing the effectiveness of a college freshman seminar using propensity score adjustments. Research in Higher Education 52(6): 616–639. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9208-x.

Dehejia

Wahba

(2002) Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1): 151–161. doi:10.3386/w6829.

Finley

McNair

(2013) Assessing underserved students' engagement in high-impact practices, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

10.

Freedman, M. B. (1956). The passage through college. Journal of Social Issues, 12(4), 13–28. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1956.tb00385.x.

11.

Gahagan

Hunter

M. S.

(2006) The second-year experience: Turning attention to the academy’s middle children. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience 11: 17–22. doi:10.1002/abc.168.

12.

Gallini

S. M.

Moely

B. E.

(2003) Service-learning and engagement, academic challenge, and retention. Michigan Journal of Community Service 10(1): 5–14.

13.

Gardner, J. N. (2000). From drift to engagement: Finding purpose and making career connections in the sophomore year. In L. A. Schreiner & J. Pattengale (Eds.), Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed (pp. 19–29). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

14.

Graunke

S. S.

Woosley

S. A.

(2005) An exploration of the factors that affect the academic success of college sophomores. College Student Journal 39(2): 367–377.

15.

Harris, R. E. (2012). The role of E-mentoring in helping college sophomores persist and stay enrolled. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University, Arizona.

16.

Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Muthiah, R. (2002). Institutional strategies to involve first-year students in service. In E. Zlotkowski (Ed.), Service-learning and the first-year experience: Preparing students for personal success and civic responsibility (Monograph No. 34) (pp. 79–90). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

17.

Hunter

Tobolowsky

Gardner

Evenbeck

Pattengale

Schaller

Schreiner

(2010) Helping sophomores succeed: Understanding and improving the second-year experience, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.

18.

Imbens

(2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 4–29. doi:10.1162/003465304323023651.

19.

Ishitani

(2016) Time-varying effects of academic and social integration on student persistence for first and second years in college: National data approach. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 18(3): 263–2861. doi:10.1177/1521025115622781.

20.

Jenkins-Guarnieri

M. A.

Vaughan

A. L.

Wright

S. L.

(2015) Development of a self-determination measure for college students: Validity evidence for the basic needs satisfaction at college scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 48(4): 266–284. doi:10.1177/0748175615578737.

21.

Kawczynski, K. (2009). The college sophomore student experience: A phenomenological study of a second year program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa, HI.

22.

Kerkvliet

Nowell

(2005) Does one size fit all? University difference in the influence of wages, financial aid, and integration on student retention. Economics of Education Review 24(1): 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.03.009.

23.

Keup

J. R.

Gahagan

Goodwin

(2010) 2008 national survey of sophomore-year initiatives: Curricular and cocurricular structures supporting the success of second-year college students, Sterling, VA: National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition.

24.

Kilgo

C. A.

Ezell Sheets

J. K.

Pascarella

E. T.

(2015) The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning 69(4): 509–525. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z.

25.

Kleinsasser

Wiley

Fisher

Heaney

Rush

(2014) The missing middle: Describing a professional development model convening secondary and postsecondary faculty to examine student writing. Education: In a Democracy 6: 85–110.

26.

Kuh

Schneider

(2008) High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

27.

Lane

Shelley

Henson

(2012) An illustrative example of propensity score matching with education research. Career and Technical Education Research 3: 187–212. doi:10.5328/cter37.3.187.

28.

McKay

V. C.

Estrella

(2008) First-generation student success: The role of faculty interaction in service learning courses. Communication Education 57(3): 356–372. doi:10.1080/03634520801966123.

29.

Mortensen, K. (2005). Civic engagement and community learning initiatives: Is there a tie? (Senior Theses). Trinity College, Hartford, CT.

30.

Mundy, M., & Eyler, J. (2002). Service-learning & retention: Promising possibilities, potential partnerships. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED482320).

31.

National Survey of Student Engagement (2008) Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within, Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research.

32.

Noel-Levitz. (2011). 2011 Student retention practices at four-year and two-year institutions. Coralville, IO: Noel-Levitz, Inc. Retrieved from: www.noellevitz.com/BenchmarkReports.

33.

Pascarella

Terenzini

(2005) How college affects students: A third decade of research, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

34.

Pullins, T. L. (2011). Predicting the retention of college sophomores: The importance of satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Azusa Pacific University, MI.

35.

Schaller

M. A.

(2005) Wandering and wondering: Traversing the uneven terrain of the second college year. About Campus 10(3): 17–24.

36.

Schreiner, L. A., & Pattengale, J. (2000). Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition.

37.

Schnell

C. A.

Louis

K. S.

Doetkott

(2003) The first-year seminar as a means of improving college graduation rates. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 15(1): 53–75.

38.

Schudde

L. T.

(2011) The causal effect of campus residency on college student retention. The Review of Higher Education 34(4): 581–610. doi:10.1353/rhe.2011.0023.

39.

Simonet

(2008, May) Service-learning and academic success: The links to retention research, St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Campus Compact.

40.

Tinto

(1993) Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

41.

Tinto

(2004) Student retention and graduation: Facing the truth, living with the consequences, Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.

42.

Tobolowsky

(2008) Sophomores in transition: The forgotten year. New Directions for Higher Education 144: 59–67. doi:10.1002/he.326.

43.

Tobolowsky

B. F.

Cox

B. E.

(2007) Shedding light on sophomores: An exploration of the second college year, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition.

44.

Townsend

B. K.

Wilson

(2006) “A hand hold for a little bit”: Factors facilitating the success of community college transfer students to a large research university. Journal of College Student Development 47(4): 439–456. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0052.

45.

Tuckman

B. W.

Kennedy

G. J.

(2011) Teaching learning strategies to increase success of first-term college students. The Journal of Experimental Education 79: 478–504. doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.512318.

46.

Walsh, M. E. (2013). The retention puzzle reconsidered: Second year student attitudes and experiences with advising. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Portland State University, Oregon.

47.

Whalen

Saunders

Shelley

(2009) Leveraging what we know to enhance short-term and long-term retention of university students. Journal of College Student Retention 11(3): 407–430. doi:10.2190/CS.11.3.f.

48.

Wilder

J. S.

(1993) The sophomore slump: A complex developmental period that contributes to attrition. College Student Affairs Journal 12(2): 18–27.

49.

Yeh

T. L.

(2010) Service-learning and persistence of low-income, first-generation college students: An exploratory study. Michigan Journal of Community Service 16(2): 50–65.

50.

C. H.

DiGangi

Jannasch-Pennell

Kaprolet

(2010) A data mining approach for identifying predictors of student retention from sophomore to junior year. Journal of Data Science 8: 307–325.

51.

Zhao

Kuh

(2004) Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education 45: 115–138. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de.

52.

Zhao, B., & White, M. N. (2016). Service learning for success – three cases at the University of Akron. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(5).