Fostering Persistence in Science,Technology,Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM): Creating an Equitable Environment That Addresses the Needs of Undergraduate Students

Abstract

Student retention is a critical issue for universities, and nearly half of the students who start degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) do not complete them. The current study tracks the progress of STEM students taking part in an entry-to-graduation program designed to build community, provide academic and social support, and promote engagement in academically purposeful activities. Although it had no effect on the number of students who changed their major, the program more than doubled the number of students who graduated in their original major. Black or Hispanic students taking part in the program also graduated at twice the rate of comparator students, largely attributable to the success of women in these groups. The results provide needed real-world insights into how to create an equitable environment that promotes the persistence and graduation of students, including those from groups historically underrepresented in STEM.

Keywords

student success retention graduation STEM persistence underrepresented groups women

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astin

(1997). How “good” is your institution's retention rate? Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 647–658.

Astin

A. W.

(1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.

Astorne-Figari

Speer

J. D.

(2018). Drop out, switch majors, or persist? The contrasting gender gaps. Economics Letters, 164, 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.010

Astorne-Figari

Speer

J. D.

(2019). Are changes of major major changes? The roles of grades, gender, and preferences in college major switching. Economics of Education Review, 70, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.03.005

Banks

Dohy

(2019). Mitigating barriers to persistence: A review of efforts to improve retention and graduation rates for students of color in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 118–131. https://doi.org 10.5539/ hes.v9n1p118

Bean

(1990). Using retention management in enrollment management. Jossey-Bass.

Beasley

M. A.

Fischer

M. J.

(2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3

Braxton

J. M.

(2016). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Vanderbilt University Press.

Braxton

J. M.

Hirschy

A. S.

McClendon

S. A.

(2011). Understanding and reducing college student departure: ASHE-ERIC higher education report, volume 30, number 3. John Wiley & Sons.

10.

Braxton

J. M.

Sullivan

A. S.

Johnson

(1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In Smart

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 107–164). Agathon.

11.

Brown

T. L.

(2000). Gender differences in African American students’ satisfaction with college. Journal of College Student Development, 41(5), 479–487.

12.

Chen

(2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014–001). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

13.

Coates

(2014). Students’ early departure intentions and the mitigating role of support. Australian Universities’ Review, 56(2), 20–29.

14.

DeBerard

M. S.

Spielmans

G. I.

Julka

D. L.

(2004). Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. College Student Journal, 38(1), 66–81.

15.

Department of Homeland Security. (2020). DHS STEM designated degree program list. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/stem-list.pdf.

16.

Eagan

Hurtado

Figueroa

Hughes

(2015). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions. National Academy of Sciences.

17.

Ganley

C. M.

George

C. E.

Cimpian

J. R.

Maowski

M. B.

(2018). Gender equity in college majors: Looking beyond the STEM/non-STEM dichotomy for answers regarding female participation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 453–487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217740221

18.

Geiser

Santelices

(2007). Validity of high-school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: High school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes (occasional paper series, 6.07). Center for Studies in Higher Education.

19.

Goodman

Schlossberg

N. K.

Anderson

M. L.

(2006). Counseling adults in transition (3rd ed.). Springer.

20.

Han

Farruggia

S. P.

Moss

T. P.

(2017). Effects of academic mindsets on college Students’ achievement and retention. Journal of College Student Development, 58(8), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0089

21.

Han

Farruggia

S. P.

Solomon

B. J.

(2020). Effects of high school students’ noncognitive factors on their success at college. Studies in Higher Education, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1770715.

22.

Hoffman

J. L.

(2002). The impact of student cocurricular involvement on student success: Racial and religious differences. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 712–739.

23.

Hoffman

J. L.

Lowitzki

K. E.

(2005). Predicting college success with high school grades and test scores: Limitations for minority students. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2005.0042

24.

Johnson

(2008). Enrollment, persistence, and graduation of in-state students at a public research university: Does high school matter? Research in Higher Education, 49(8), 776–793.

25.

Jones

Marks

Ramirez

Ríos-Vargas

(2021). 2020 census illuminates racial and ethnic composition of the country. U.S. Census Bureau.

26.

Kahu

E. R.

Nelson

(2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanism of student success. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

27.

Kim

(2015). Predictors of college retention and performance between regular and special admissions. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 52(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2015.995575

28.

Kinzie

Gonyea

Shoup

Kuh

G. D.

(2008). Promoting persistence and success of underrepresented students: Lessons for teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(115), 21–38. http://doi.org/10.1002/tl.323

29.

Korobova

Starobin

S. S.

(2015). A comparative study of student engagement, satisfaction, and academic success among international and American students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 72–85.

30.

Kuh

G. D.

(2016). Making learning meaningful: Engaging students in ways that matter to them. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2016(145), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20174

31.

Kuh

G. D.

Kinzie

Cruce

Shoup

Gonyea

R. M.

(2007). Connecting the dots: Multi-faceted analyses of the relationships between student engagement results from the NSSE, and the institutional practices and conditions that foster student success. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

32.

Langdon

McKittrick

Beede

Khan

Doms

(2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. ESA issue brief #03–11. U.S. Department of Commerce.

33.

Loo

C. M.

Rolison

(1986). Alienation of ethnic minority students at a predominantly white university. Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 58–77.

34.

Murphy

M. C.

Steele

C. M.

Gross

J. J.

(2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885.

35.

National Center for Education Statistics (202°c). Table 318.45, number and percentage distribution of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees/certificates conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, level of degree/certificate, and sex of student: 2009–2010 through 2018–2019. U.S. Department of Education.

36.

National Center for Education Statistics (2020a). Table 322.40, bachelor's degrees conferred to males by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and field of study: 2017–2018 and 2018–2019. U.S. Department of Education.

37.

National Center for Education Statistics (2020b). Table 322.50, bachelor's degrees conferred to females by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and field of study: 2017–2018 and 2018–2019. U.S. Department of Education.

38.

National Student Clearinghouse (2020). First-year persistence and retention: 2018 beginning cohort. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

39.

Norton

(2012). Graduate winners: Assessing the public and private benefits of higher education. Grattan Institute.

40.

Pfeffer

F. T.

(2018). Growing wealth gaps in education. Demography, 55(3), 1033–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0666-7

41.

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. United States White House.

42.

Rayle

A. D.

Chung

K. Y.

(2007). Revisiting first-year college students’ mattering: Social support, academic stress, and the mattering experience. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(1), 21–37.

43.

Rendón

L. I.

(1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33–51.

44.

Riegle-Crumb

King

Irizarry

(2019). Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19831006

45.

Sanford

(1966). Self and society: Social change and individual development. Atherton Press.

46.

Schlossberg

N. K.

(1989). Marginality and mattering: Key issues in building community. New Directions for Student Services, 48(1), 5–15.

47.

Seidel

Kutieleh

(2017). Using predictive analytics to target and improve first year student retention. Australian Journal of Education, 61(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944117712310

48.

Stangroom

(2021). Social science statistics. https://www.socscistatistics.com/

49.

Stillman

(2009). Making the case for the importance of student retention. Enrollment Management Journal, 3(2), 76–91.

50.

Strenta

A. C.

Elliott

Adair

Matier

Scott

(1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 513–547.

51.

Tinto

(1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

52.

Torpey

(2018). Measuring the value of education. Career Outlook, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/data-on-display/education-pays.htm.

53.

Tracey

Robbins

(2006). The interest-major congruence and college success relation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.11.003

54.

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2021). Employment in STEM occupations: Table 1.11, Employment in STEM occupations, 2020 and projected 2030 . https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm

55.

Walton

G. M.

Cohen

G. L.

(2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82

56.

Walton

G. M.

Cohen

G. L.

(2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451.

57.

Watts

(2001). Education and the common good: Social benefits of higher education in Kentucky. Kentucky Long Term Policy Research Center.

58.

Xie

Fang

Shauman

(2015). STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659