This research investigates the impact of the topics discussed in an initial advising meeting on student retention and graduation. Understanding and connecting students’ motivations and goals to degree planning is a popular research topic, but limited information is available about how to implement this. This research considers six specific discussion topics for an initial advising contact. Data on newly enrolled students was collected over 3 years. A binomial logistic model was used to estimate the impact of discussing specific topics on retention and graduation. Results suggest that discussion of when students can declare a major and identification of an anticipated graduation term significantly increases the probability of graduation.
ComingsJ. P. (2007). Persistence: Helping adult education students reach their goals. In ComingsJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy: Connecting research, policy, and practice (Vol. 7, pp. 23–46). NCSALL.
4.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
5.
CuseoJ. (2003). Academic advisement and student retention: Empirical connections and systemic interventions. National Academic Advising Association, 2019-01.
6.
DrakeJ. A. (2011). The role of academic advising in student retention and persistence. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 16(3), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20062
7.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
8.
EliasH.NoordinN.MahyuddinR. H. (2010). Achievement motivation and self-efficacy in relation to adjustment among university students. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.333.339
9.
GraweN. D. (2018). Demographics and the demand for higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
HarrisT. A. (2018). Prescriptive vs. development: Academic advising at a historically Black university in South Carolina. NACADA Journal, 38(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-15-010
HussarW. J.BaileyT. M. (2020). Projections of education statistics to 2028 (NCES 2020-024). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020024.pdf
LetkiewiczJ.LimH.HeckmanS.BartholomaeS.FoxJ. J.MontaltoC. P. (2014). The path to graduation: Factors predicting on-time graduation rates. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 16(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.16.3.c
16.
LiuC.AmmiganR. (2022). Humanizing the academic advising experience with technology: An integrative review. In AmmiganR.ChanR. Y.BistaK. (Eds.), COVID-19 and higher education in the global context: Exploring contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 185–202). STAR Scholars. https://starscholars.org/product/covid-19-and-higed/
17.
MacKinnon-SlaneyF. (1994). The adult persistence in learning model: A road map to counseling services for adult learners. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00933.x
18.
MarionJ. W.RuckertJ. M.RichardsonT. M. (2014). Do degree maps facilitate student success?Education Practice and Innovation, 1(4), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.15764/EPI.2014.04009
RobertsJ.StyronR.Jr. (2010). Student satisfaction and persistence: Factors vital to student retention. Research in Higher Education Journal, 6(1), 1–18.
TalbertP. Y. (2012). Strategies to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 22–34.
27.
TaylorJ.HouseB. (2010). An exploration of identity, motivations and concerns of non-traditional students at different stages of higher education. Psychology Teaching Review, 16(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2010.16.1.46
