Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-5
Evaluating sociocultural influences affecting participation and understanding of academic support services and programs (SSPs): Impacts on notions of attrition,retention,and success in higher education
While no major change in relation to student attrition and retention data has been recorded over the past 20 years, the increasingly neoliberal agenda imposed on Australian higher education institutions has led to increased scrutiny around such data. In this case study, we explore discourses of attrition and retention to understand better the unique needs of students, and influences of targeted student support programs, as they transition to a regional higher education learning environment. We applied a mixed methods approach via a poststructuralist lens to identify frequency of nodes in relation to dimensions of the Kahu’s conceptual framework of engagement, antecedents and consequences model and present staff (n=6) and student (n=7) perceptions about the tangible value of knowledge, engagement, participation, and reportable outcomes of student support programs. Our findings indicate that staff tend to view student support programs from deficit discourses, whereas students view them as empowering.
AltermattE. R. (2016). Academic support from peers as a predictor of academic self-efficacy among college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 29. doi:10.1177/1521025116686588
BettingerE.BoatmanA.LongB. (2013).
Student supports: Developmental education and other academic programs.The Future of Children,
23(1), 93–115.
4.
BowlesA.FisherR.McPhailR.RosenstreichD.DobsonA. (2014).
Staying the distance: Students’ perceptions of enablers of transition to higher education.Higher Education Research & Development,
33(2), 212–255. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.832157
5.
CrawfordN.JohnsS.JarvisL.HawkinsC.HarrisM.McCormackD. (2015). Foundations for change, confidence, and new opportunities: Impacts of a university enabling program in north-west Tasmania. Paper presented at the Students Transitions Achievement Retention and Success (STARS) conference, Melbourne, Australia.
6.
CurranR. (2017).
Students as partners—Good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement.International Journal for Students as Partners,
1(2), 1–16. doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
7.
Department of Education and Training. (2015). 2014 Appendix 4–Attrition, success and retention. Australian Government. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/38149
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006).
Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,
5(10), 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
10.
FotinatosN.SaboE. (2018).
Impact of centrally coordinated higher education pre-commencement of teaching student support initiative (FedReady) on student engagement: A regional university case study. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal,
2(1), 86–92. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
11.
FreitasA. F.LeonardL. J. (2011).
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and student academic success.Teaching and Learning in Nursing,
6(1), 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.004
12.
GaleT.ParkerS. (2014).
Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education.Studies in Higher Education,
39(5), 734–753. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.721351
13.
Grant-ValloneE.ReidK.UmaliC.PohlertE. (2003).
An analysis of the effects of self-esteem, social support, and participation in student support services on students’ adjustment and commitment to college.Journal of College Student Retention,
5(3), 255–274. doi:10.2190/C0T7-YX50-F71V-00CW
14.
JonesJ.BonnanoH.ScoullerK. (2001). Staff and student roles in central and faculty-based learning support: Changing partnerships. In B. James, A. Percy, J. Skillen, & N. Trivett (Eds), Changing identities: Proceedings of the 2001 Australian Language and Academic Skills Conference. Wollongong, Australia: Association for Academic Language and Learning. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/8515095?q&versionId=19804398
15.
JuryM.SmedingA.StephensN. M.NelsonJ. E.AeleneiC.DarnonC. (2017).
The experience of low-SES students in higher education: Psychological barriers to success and intervention to reduce social-class inequality.Journal of Social Issues,
73(1), 23–41. doi:10.111/josi.12202
16.
KahuE. (2013).
Framing student engagement in higher education.Studies in Higher Education,
38(5), 758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
17.
KiftS.Nelson.K (2005). Beyond curriculum reform: Embedding the transition experience. In A. Brew & C. Asmar (Eds), Proceedings of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) conference, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/3944/
18.
KorinekL.Walther-ThomasC.McLaughlinV.Toler WilliamsB. (1999).
Creating classroom communities and networks for student support.Intervention in School and Clinic,
35(1), 3–8. doi:10.1177/105345129903500101
MasikaR.JonesJ. (2016).
Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together.Teaching in Higher Education,
21(2), 138–150. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585
21.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality.
New York, NY:
Harper and Row.
22.
MellorD.BrooksW.GrayS.JordanR. (2015).
Troubled transitions into college and the effects of a small intervention course.Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
17(1), 44–63. doi:10.1177/1521025115571102
23.
NelsonK.ReadmanK.StoodleyI. (2018). Shaping the 21st century student experience at regional universities.
Canberra, Australia:
Department of Education and Training.
24.
NoraA.CrispG. (2007).
Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system.Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
9(3), 337–356. doi:10.2190/CS.9.3.e
RumbleG. (2000).
Student support in distance education in the 21st century: Learning from service management.Distance Education,
21(2), 216–235. doi:10.1080/0158791000210202
27.
TintoV. (2006).
Research and practice of student retention: What next?Journal of College Student Retention,
8(1), 1–19. doi:10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W
28.
TodorovaR. (2017).
Making sense of one’s place in an educational opportunity program. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9. doi:10.1177/1521025117713304
29.
WalshC.LarsenC.ParryD. (2009).
Academic tutors at the frontline of student support in a cohort of students succeeding in higher education.Educational Studies,
35(4), 405–424. doi:10.1080/03055690902876438
30.
WingateU. (2007).
A framework for transition: Supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education.Higher Education Quarterly,
61(3), 391–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00361.x
31.
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2005). Integration and adaptation: Approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(1), 46–59. doi: 10.1177%2F1469787405049946
32.
ZepkeN. (2015).
Student engagement research: Thinking beyond the mainstream.Higher Education Research & Development,
34(6), 1–13. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1024635
