Promoting social well-being entails ensuring equal opportunities for students from diverse social backgrounds in higher education. Drawing on Tinto's Model of Student Motivation and Persistence, this study investigates how psychological constructs—self-efficacy, sense of belonging, perception of curricular relevance, quality of choice, and persistence intention—vary across groups distinguished by social origin. Data were collected from 367 undergraduate students enrolled in STEM programs at a public university in Brazil. principal component analysis and cluster analysis revealed four student profiles: on the edge of a precipice, underrepresented, workers, and privileged. These profiles, shaped by distinct social characteristics, differ in their psychological constructs’ levels and, consequently, persistence intention. While adaptation to institutional environment is key to persistence, social origin mediates both access to university and interpretation of institutional experiences. Findings underscore the importance of tailoring institutional policies to recognize and support diverse student profiles to promote equitable opportunities for success.
AinaC.BaiciE.CasaloneG.PastoreF. (2022). The determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79, 101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101102
2.
AjamA. A.HemmatipoorO.RahimiH. (2018). The relationship between students’ perceptions of curriculum components and their academic enthusiasm. Journal of Medical Education, 11(30), 84–97. httpss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.29252/edcj.11.30.70
3.
AllenJ.FarberS. (2018). How time-use and transportation barriers limit on-campus participation of university students. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.08.003
4.
BassiM.StecaP.FaveA. D.CapraraG. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9069-y
5.
BeggsJ. M.BanthamJ. H.TaylorS. (2008). Distinguishing the factors influencing college students’ choice of major. College Student Journal, 42(2), 381–395.
6.
BerhanL. M.AdamsA. L.McKetherW. L.KumarR. (2019). Social Networks Analysis of African American Engineering Students at a PWI and an HBCU–A Comparative Study. In Conference Proceedings of 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-32253
7.
BlackburnS. (2005). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. OUP Oxford.
8.
BoylanR. L. (2020). Predicting postsecondary pathways: The effect of social background and academic factors on routes through school. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 2378023119895174. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119895174
9.
ClementL. (2016). External and internal barriers to studying can affect student success and retention in a diverse classroom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1077
10.
ContiniD.CugnataF.ScagniA. (2018). Social selection in higher education. Enrolment, dropout and timely degree attainment in Italy. Higher Education, 75(5), 785–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0170-9
11.
FrancoB. V. D. E.EspinosaT.HeidemannL. A. (2024). Autorregulação acadêmica como um elemento importante da intenção de persistir: Um estudo empírico com estudantes de graduação em física. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 26, e45565.
12.
FrancoB. V. D. E.MoraesK. R. D. M.EspinosaT.HeidemannL. A. (2022). Evasão e persistência estudantil em cursos de graduação das áreas de ciências e matemática: Uma revisão da literatura. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 27(1), 272–307. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2022v27n1p272
Goldrick-RabS. (2006). Following their every move: An investigation of social-class differences in college pathways. Sociology of Education, 79(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070607900104
15.
Gregg-JollyL.SwartzJ.IversonE.SternJ.BrownN.LopattoD. (2016). Situating second-year success: Understanding second-year STEM experiences at a liberal arts college. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar43. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0044
16.
HellandH.StrømmeT. B. (2024). Social inequality in completion rates in higher education: Heterogeneity in educational fields. The British Journal of Sociology, 75(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13075
17.
HerbautE. (2021). Overcoming failure in higher education: Social inequalities and compensatory advantage in dropout patterns. Acta Sociologica, 64(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699320920916
18.
HolandaM.von BorriesG.Da SilvaD.DoreaC.OliveiraR. B.IshikawaE. (2020). The intellectual sense of belonging and self-efficacy in the Introduction to computer science courses at university of Brasilia in Brazil. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274010
JuryM.AeleneiC.ChenC.DarnonC.ElliotA. J. (2019). Examining the role of perceived prestige in the link between students’ subjective socioeconomic status and sense of belonging. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219827361
25.
KnopM.CollaresA. C. M. (2019). A influência da origem social na probabilidade de concluir os diferentes cursos de ensino superior. Sociedade e Estado, 34(02), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-201934020001
26.
LehmannW. (2007). I just didn't feel like I fit in": The role of habitus in university dropout decisions. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(2), 89–110. http://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v37i2.542
27.
LiaoC. N.JiC. H. (2015). The origin of major choice, academic commitment, and career-decision readiness among Taiwanese college students. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12011
Lima Jr.P.FragaJ. C.AndradeV. C. D.BernardinoP. R. P. (2020). A integração dos estudantes de periferia no curso de física: Razões institucionais da evasão segundo a origem social. Ciência & Educação, 26, e20030. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320200030
30.
Lima Jr.P.OstermannF.RezendeF. (2013). Análise dos condicionantes sociais do sucesso acadêmico em cursos de graduação em física à luz da sociologia de bourdieu. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 15(1), 113–129.
31.
MannanM. A. (2007). Student attrition and academic and social integration: Application of tinto’s model at the university of Papua New Guinea. Higher Education, 53(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-2496-y
32.
MartinsF. D. S.MachadoD. C. (2018). Uma análise da escolha do curso superior no brasil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, 35(1), e0056. https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0056
33.
MerrittD. L.BuboltzW. (2015). Academic success in college: Socioeconomic status and parental influence as predictors of outcome. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(5), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.35018
34.
MetcalfD. A.WienerK. K. K. (2018). Academic self-efficacy in a twenty-first-century Australian university: Strategies for first-generation students. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1472–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1484705
35.
MeyerJ.StraußS. (2019). The influence of gender composition in a field of study on students’ drop-out of higher education. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12357
36.
MoraesK. R. D. M. (2020). Uma investigação exploratória sobre as implicações das experiências de primeiro semestre de curso na decisão de evadir ou persistir dos estudantes de licenciatura em física da UFRGS. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/206651
37.
MoraesK.HeidemannL.de OliveiraT. E. (2020). Métodos ativos de ensino podem ser entendidos como recursos para o combate à evasão em cursos de ciências exatas? Uma análise pautada nas ideias de vincent tinto. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 37(2), 369–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n2p369
38.
MosesM. S. (2001). Affirmative action and the creation of more favorable contexts of choice. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038001003
39.
PedlerM. L.WillisR.NieuwoudtJ. E. (2022). A sense of belonging at university: Student retention, motivation and enjoyment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1955844
PigossoL. T.RibeiroB. S.HeidemannL. A. (2020). A evasão na perspectiva de quem persiste: Um estudo sobre os fatores que influenciam na decisão de evadir ou persistir em cursos de licenciatura em física pautado pelos relatos dos formandos. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 20, 245–273. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u245273
42.
Ramos-SánchezL.NicholsL. (2007). Self-efficacy of first-generation and non-first-generation college students: The relationship with academic performance and college adjustment. Journal of College Counseling, 10(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2007.tb00002.x
43.
RibeiroB. S.HeidemannL. A.EspinosaT.LimaP.Jr. (in press). The Influence of Socioeconomic Background on STEM Retention: An Analysis Through Tinto’s Model of Student Motivation and Persistence. The Review of Higher Education.
44.
RichardsonJ. T. (2005). Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192052000310001
45.
RodriguesL. (2024). Estratificação horizontal do ensino superior brasileiro e as profissões imperiais: Os concluintes de medicina, engenharia e direito entre 2009 e 2017. Dados, 67(1), e20210118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2024.67.1.312
46.
Seyedi-AndiS. J.BakoueiF.Adib RadH.KhafriS.SalavatiA. (2019). The relationship between self-efficacy and some demographic and socioeconomic variables among Iranian medical sciences students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 645–651. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S185780
47.
SmithJ. P.NaylorR. A. (2001). Dropping out of university: A statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 164(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00209
48.
SouzaP. H. G. F. D. (2018). Uma História da Desigualdade: a Concentração de Renda entre os Ricos no Brasil (1926-2013). Hucitec.
49.
StebletonM. J.SoriaK. M.Huesman JrR. L. (2014). First-generation students’ sense of belonging, mental health, and use of counseling services at public research universities. Journal of College Counseling, 17(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00044.x
50.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
51.
TintoV. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 25, 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_2
52.
TintoV. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press.
53.
TintoV. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917
54.
TintoV. (2022). Increasing student persistence: Wanting and doing. In Student support services (pp. 53–70). Springer Nature Singapore. Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5852-5_33
55.
TintoV. (2025). Student persistence through a different Lens. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 26(4), 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251241249158
56.
TrawalterS.HoffmanK.PalmerL. (2021). Out of place: Socioeconomic status, use of public space, and belonging in higher education. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000248
57.
TsuiL. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. The Journal of Negro Education, 555–581.
58.
WangC. C. D.Castañeda-SoundC. (2008). The role of generational status, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy, and perceived social support in college students’ psychological well-being. Journal of College Counseling, 11(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2008.tb00028.x
59.
WebberK. L.KrylowR. B.ZhangQ. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0090
60.
WeiserD. A.RiggioH. R. (2010). Family background and academic achievement: Does self-efficacy mediate outcomes?Social Psychology of Education, 13, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9115-1
61.
WiederkehrV.DarnonC.ChazalS.GuimondS.MartinotD. (2015). From social class to self-efficacy: Internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9308-8
62.
WilsonR. E.KittlesonJ. (2013). Science as a classed and gendered endeavor: Persistence of two white female first-generation college students within an undergraduate science context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 802–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21087
