Abstract
Background:
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasing in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). Yet, standardized CGM-based insulin titration is lacking. This study evaluated the feasibility of algorithmic CGM-based titration compared with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) titration.
Methods:
We conducted a 16-week, two-site, randomized controlled trial in adults with T2D (glycated hemoglobin 7%–9%) using degludec and adjunctive noninsulin agents, without rapid-acting insulin. Participants were assigned (2:1) to weekly algorithmic CGM-based dose changes with open CGM (EXP) or weekly SMBG-based titration with blinded CGM (CTR). Both groups received dose notifications via phone. The primary endpoint was the change in CGM-measured time in range (TIR, 70–180 mg/dL) from baseline to week 16, tested for noninferiority (−5%-percentage points [%-pt]). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06111508.
Results:
A total of 30 participants were randomized. Mean (standard deviation) TIR increased from 54.1% (22.5%) to 75.3% (19.3%) in EXP and from 50.2% (22.1%) to 55.3% (22.7%) in CTR. Mean change was +20.3%-pt versus +8.3%-pt, yielding an estimated treatment difference (EXP − CTR) of +14.6%-pt; one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) lower bound was +4.0%-pt, exceeding the noninferiority margin (P < 0.005). Exploratory superiority analysis showed two-sided 95% CI: 1.3–27.8 (P = 0.03). CGM-measured hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was low (median [interquartile range]: 0.34% [0.09–0.90] vs. 0.00% [0.00–0.41]), and level 2 episodes (SMBG <54 mg/dL) were rare (1.1 vs. 2.2 patient-year of exposure). No severe hypoglycemia or serious adverse events occurred.
Conclusions:
Using CGM and receiving algorithmic CGM-based titrations were feasible, safe, and had favorable overall glycemic metrics. Long-term impact should be confirmed in broader populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
